Article
Fragmentation in simple trade models

Paper presented in a session on “Globalization and Regionalism: Conflict or Complements?” North American Economics and Finance Association, Chicago, IL, January 4, 1998, revised January 8, 1998.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1062-9408(01)00043-2Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of “fragmentation,” defined as the splitting of a production process into two or more steps that can be undertaken in different locations but that lead to the same final product. Introducing the possibility of fragmentation into simple theoretical models of international trade, the paper finds the effects of fragmentation on national welfare, on patterns of specialization and trade, and on factor prices. Models examined include the Ricardian Model and the Heckscher-Ohlin Model, both for small open economies and for a two-country world. Results are as follows: 1. If fragmentation does not change the prices of goods, then it must increase the value of output of any country where it occurs and that of the world. 2. If fragmentation does change prices, then fragmentation can lower the welfare of a country by turning its terms of trade against it. 3. Even in a country that gains from fragmentation, it is possible (but not necessary) that some factor owners within that country will lose. 4. To the extent that factor prices are not equalized internationally in the absence of fragmentation, fragmentation may be a force toward factor price equalization.

Introduction

The subject is fragmentation: the splitting of a production process into two or more steps that can be undertaken in different locations but that lead to the same final product. Also called “intraproduct specialization” by Arndt (1998) and by the more loaded term “outsourcing” in some economic literature as well as in the popular press, fragmentation occurs both within countries and across countries.1 Within countries, if domestic factor markets are well integrated and markets are competitive, then fragmentation would be expected to occur only if the combined resources used by the fragmented steps were less than those used by the original process, in which case fragmentation would also represent a technological improvement. In this paper I will assume instead that fragmentation does not economize on resources, and therefore I will focus on fragmentation that occurs across countries.2

Internationally, fragmentation has become increasingly common in recent years as barriers to international trade and investment have fallen and as an increasingly competitive world environment has forced producers to look outside their own borders for ways to reduce costs. In the debate over the causes of increased wage inequality in the United States in the 1980s and 90s, “globalization” and technology have both been suggested as important causes of the increased wage differential paid to skilled labor, globalization being represented variously by international trade, foreign direct investment, factor mobility, and outsourcing.3 In fact, fragmentation may be thought of as a manifestation of globalization and technology combined, since in many industries it is only advances in technology that have made the splitting of production processes and the coordination of the resulting parts possible.

In any case, with the exception of Arndt (1997) and Jones and Kierzkowski (2001), the economic effects of fragmentation do not seem to have been given the theoretical treatment they deserve, and in this paper I will attempt to correct that.4 Using several familiar and simple models of international trade, I will examine the implications of fragmentation on trade, patterns of specialization, and factor markets, looking especially at its effects on factor prices and on the overall welfare of the countries involved.

I will examine the effects of fragmentation first in a Ricardian model in section 2, then in a Heckscher-Ohlin model in section 3. Section 4 concludes.

Section snippets

Fragmentation in Ricardo

I will look first at the effects of fragmentation on a small open economy, then at a large country in a two-country world.

Fragmentation in Heckscher-Ohlin

The simplicity of the Ricardian model is valuable for the insights that it can yield into the behavior of more complicated models. For example, a Heckscher-Ohlin (H-O) model can approximate arbitrarily closely to the Ricardian model of Section 2, and therefore we can conclude immediately that a large country can lose from fragmentation, even in a H-O world. However, there are other details that are assumed away in a Ricardian model that it therefore cannot address. The most obvious and

Conclusion

The underlying question addressed in this paper is, “Does fragmentation matter?” Or, since this is a theoretical piece, not empirical, “Can it matter?” The answer seems to be a relatively strong “Yes.”

Of course, fragmentation will not matter if factor prices are equal everywhere, for then the fragmented technologies will at best duplicate what was done without them and there will be no reason to use them. But if factor prices are not equal across countries, either because technologies differ as

Acknowledgements

I have benefited from discussions on this topic with Peter Debaere, Sven Arndt, and other participants in the Globalization workshop held at Claremont in January 1997, as well as participants in the NAEFA session for which the paper was initially written, including my discussant, Matthew Slaughter.

References (15)

  • Alan V. Deardorff

    FIRless FIRwoeshow preferences can interfere with the theorems of international trade

    Journal of International Economics

    (1986)
  • Alan V. Deardorff

    The possibility of factor price equalization, revisited

    Journal of International Economics

    (1994)
  • Sven W. Arndt

    Globalization and the open economy

    North American Journal of Economics and Finance

    (1997)
  • Sven W. Arndt

    Super-specialization and the gains from trade

    Contemporary Economic Policy

    (1998)
  • Paul N. Courant et al.

    International trade with lumpy countries

    Journal of Political Economy

    (1992)
  • Debaere, Peter, & Demiroglu, Ufuk (1997). On the similarity of country endowments and factor price equalization among...
  • Avinash K. Dixit et al.

    Theory of international trade

    (1980)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (187)

  • Impact of the “Belt and Road Initiative” on machinery production networks

    2021, Economic Modelling
    Citation Excerpt :

    This theoretical framework provides a new perspective for understanding the trade patterns of vertical production links or cross-border production sharing systems and focuses on location patterns related to production processes rather than industry. In explaining the nature of fragmentation, Deardorff (2001) stated that the effects of fragmentation can be considerable if factor prices are not equal across countries as a result of differences in technologies or factor endowments.15 The division of labor results in each worker becoming more specialized in particular tasks.

  • Offshoring, industry heterogeneity and employment

    2021, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics
  • The effect of global value chain position on green technology innovation efficiency: From the perspective of environmental regulation

    2021, Ecological Indicators
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the environmental pressures in the clean industries are relatively weak, and the rise of GVC position plays a greater role in promoting the GTIE. The essence of GVC division is the division of labor among various links in the value chain with different factor intensities (Deardorff, 2001). China’s manufacturing industry has prominent differences in resource endowment such as labor, knowledge and capital.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text