Elsevier

Crop Protection

Volume 21, Issue 5, June 2002, Pages 403-408
Crop Protection

Southern blight (Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc.) of cowpea: yield-loss estimates and sources of resistance

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00122-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Replicated field studies were conducted over a three-year period to assess the yield-reducing potential of southern blight (Sclerotium rolfsii) on cowpea, and to evaluate the range of genetic variability in cowpea germplasm for resistance. Southern blight was shown to have a considerably greater impact on dry-seed yields than that suggested by a review of the published literature. The disease caused a dry-seed yield loss of 53.4% in one study, and losses approaching 50% were observed for some cultivars in a second study. Reduced pod numbers likely accounted for most of the reduced dry-seed yields. There is significant variability in cowpea germplasm for resistance to southern blight. Two cultivars, Brown Crowder and Carolina Cream, exhibited promising levels of resistance in two years of testing.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The data reported here are from replicated field studies conducted at the US Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC, during the years 1984, 1985, and 1986. Seeds of all cowpea accessions evaluated in these studies were produced by the authors prior to the initiation of specific studies and all seed lots exhibited high germination. The severity of southern blight symptoms in all of the studies was assessed by assigning each plant a subjective score for severity of wilting. Each plant in the 1984

Relationship between time of inoculation and dry-seed yield (1984 study)

An examination of the results of the early, medium, and late sclerotia inoculation treatments of the cultivar Pinkeye Purple Hull indicates that early inoculation with 20 sclerotia/plant, 35 days after planting, was the most effective timing for inoculation of cowpea plots (Table 1). This treatment caused a 53.4% reduction in seed yield from the uninoculated control, and an examination of the stem-lesion data suggests that most of the plants developed large stem lesions prior to harvest. The

Conclusions

The results of the studies reported here support the long-standing theory that southern blight is an important disease of cowpea. However, our data demonstrates that the impact of southern blight on cowpea seed yields can be considerably greater than that suggested by a review of the published literature. Reduced pod numbers likely accounted for most of the reduced seed yields. There is significant variability in the resistance of cowpea germplasm to southern blight. Two cultivars, Brown

References (9)

  • Aycock, R., 1966. Stem rot and other diseases caused by Sclerotium Rolfsii or the status of Rolfs’ fungus after 70...
  • W.M. Epps et al.

    Physiology and parasitism of Sclerotium rolfsii

    Phytopathology

    (1951)
  • D.E. Hoffmaster et al.

    The problem of dry rot caused by Macrophomina phaseoli (=Sclerotium bataticola)

    Phytopathology

    (1943)
  • S.F. Jenkins et al.

    Problems and progress in integrated control of southern blight of vegetables

    Plant Dis.

    (1986)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (28)

  • Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) detection of soilborne pathogen Sclerotium rolfsii

    2019, Applied Soil Ecology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Uninoculated pots were used with 6 uninfected grains as a control. Total of 20 inoculated and 40 uninoculated pots were assessed 8 weeks after inoculation for disease severity using a scale of 0–5 based on previously published disease scale (Fery and Dukes, 2002) with modifications, where 0 = no symptoms of basal stem lesions or wilting of leaves; 1 =< 20% of leaves wilted and/or 20% of basal stem with lesion; 2 = 20–40% of leaves wilted and/or 20–40% of basal stems with lesions; 3 = 40–60% of leaves wilted and/or 40–60% basal stem with lesions; 4 = 60–80% of leaves wilted and/or 60–80% of basal stem with lesions; and 5 => 80% of leaves wilted or dead plant (Wu et al., 2015). After completion of the greenhouse experiments, soil microbial DNA was extracted from 0.75 g soil samples using a PowerMax® Soil DNA Isolation Kit (Mo Bio Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) per supplier instructions.

  • Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii on tomato by delivering antagonistic bacteria through a drip irrigation system

    2010, Crop Protection
    Citation Excerpt :

    After 24 h the tomato plants were inoculated by spraying on the stem zone, including the wound, as well as on the entire pot-soil surface, with 200 μL of fungal (R. solani and S. rolfsii) biomass. Disease severity was periodically assessed using an empirical key of 5 disease classes: 1 (no stem lesion), 2 (small stem lesion: <25% of the stem circumference), 3 (moderate stem lesion: 26–50% of the stem circumference), 4 (large stem lesion: >51% of the stem circumference), and 5 (dead plant: stem completely girdled) (Fery and Dukes, 2002). The experiment was conducted twice and the data of repeated experiments were pooled before performing statistical analysis.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text