Calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00014-XGet rights and content

Abstract

The SLEUTH model (slope, landuse, exclusion, urban extent, transportation and hillshade), formerly called the Clarke Cellular Automaton Urban Growth Model, was developed for and tested on various cities in North America, including Washington, DC, and San Francisco. In contrast, this research calibrated the SLEUTH model for two European cities, the Portuguese metropolitan areas of Lisbon and Porto. The SLEUTH model is a cellular automaton model, developed with predefined growth rules applied spatially to gridded maps of the cities in a set of nested loops, and was designed to be both scaleable and universally applicable. Urban expansion is modeled in a modified two-dimensional regular grid. Maps of topographic slope, land use, exclusions, urban extents, road transportation, and a graphic hillshade layer form the model input. This paper examines differences in the model's behavior when the obviously different environment of a European city is captured in the data and modeled. Calibration results are included and interpreted in the context of the two cities, and an evaluation of the model's portability and universality of application is made. Questions such as scalability, sequential multistage optimization by automated exploration of model parameter space, the problem of equifinality, and parameter sensitivity to local conditions are explored. The metropolitan areas present very different spatial and developmental characteristics. The Lisbon Metropolitan Area (the capital of Portugal) has a mix of north Atlantic and south Mediterranean influences. Property is organized in large patches of extensive farmland comprised of olive and cork orchards. The urban pattern of Lisbon and its environs is characterized by rapid urban sprawl, focused in the urban centers of Lisbon, Oeiras, Cascais Setúbal, and Almada, and by intense urbanization along the main road and train lines radiating from the major urban centers. The Porto Metropolitan Area is characterized by a coastal Atlantic landscape. The urban pattern is concentrated among the main nuclei (Porto and Vila Nova de Gaia) and scattered among many small rural towns and villages. There are very small isolated patches of intensive agriculture and pine forests in a topography of steep slopes. These endogenous territorial characteristics go back in time to the formation of Portugal — with a “Roman-Visigod North” and an “Arabic South” [Firmino, 1999 (Firmino, A., 1999. Agriculture and landscape in portugal. Landscape and Urban planning, 46, 83–91); Ribeiro, Lautensach, & Daveau, 1991 (Ribeiro, O., Lautensach, H., & Daveau, S., 1991. Geografia de portugal (4 Vols., published between 1986 and 1991). Lisbon, Portugal: João Sá de Costa)]. The SLEUTH model calibration captured these city characteristics, and using the standard documented calibration procedures, seems to have adapted itself well to the European context. Useful predictions of growth to 2025, and investigation of the impact of planning and transportation construction can be investigated as a consequence of the successful calibration. Further application and testing of the SLEUTH model in non-Western environments may prove it to be the elusive universal model of urban growth, the antithesis of the special case urban models of the 1960s and 1970s.

Introduction

Modeling is essential for the analysis, and especially for the prediction, of the dynamics of urban growth. Yet the successful application of a model in one particular geographical area does not necessarily imply its successful use in another setting where local characteristics, territorial constraints and the classic site and situation properties of economic geography ensure that different development paths have been followed. Urban and environmental models need to be adapted to or able to “learn” the endogenous characteristics of the particular milieu that they explain and predict. Models are often judged by their predictive power. Yet, to model urbanization across locales, it is just as important to test the efficacy of the model's algorithms at capturing and simulating the land transformations that are specific to a place (Batty & Xie, 1994b, Clarke et al., 1996, Li & Yeh, 2000).

This paper focuses on calibrating the SLEUTH model, formerly the Clarke Cellular Automaton Urban Growth Model (Clarke & Gaydos, 1998, Clarke et al., 1997) for two Portuguese metropolitan areas. SLEUTH is an acronym for the input layers that the model uses in gridded map form: Slope, Land Use, Exclusion, Urban Extent, Transportation and Hillshade. The basic growth procedure in SLEUTH is a cellular automaton, in which urban expansion is modeled in a spatial two-dimensional grid. Diffusion, breed, spread, slope and road coefficients control the behavior of the cellular automaton, and four types of growth behavior can take place: spontaneous, diffusive, organic and road-influenced. Self-modification of the rules changes the control parameters when modeled growth rates are exceeded, so that the model's behavior includes feedback (Clarke et al., 1997). In cellular automata simulating artificial life, self-modification is equivalent to adaptation or evolution, and the calibration method used allows the model to “learn” its local setting over time (Clarke et al., 1996). This learning is quantified by the variation during calibration of the five control parameters. Calibration of the model has taken place for many cities within North America, but not elsewhere. Application of the model to Lisbon and Porto in Portugal is the first application to European cities, and indeed the first major application outside of the United States.

The SLEUTH model was applied to the metropolitan areas of Lisbon and Porto. These Portuguese cities present very different environmental and geographic characteristics that test the model's flexibility to adapt to different urban realities. Lisbon is the capital of Portugal, and the administratively defined metropolitan area includes large patches of farmland comprised of olive, cork, and fruit orchards surrounding the mouth of the Tagus River. The urban pattern of Lisbon and its environs is characterized by recent rapid urban sprawl, focused in the urban centers of Lisbon, Oeiras, Cascais Setúbal, and Almada, and by intensive urbanization along the main roads and train lines radiating from those major urban centers. By contrast, the Porto Metropolitan Area is characterized by a coastal Atlantic landscape at the west-facing mouth of the smaller River Douro and is surrounded by mountains. The urban pattern is concentrated at main nuclei (Porto and Vila Nova de Gaia) and settlements are scattered among many small rural towns and villages with small patches of intensive agriculture and pine forests.

Section snippets

Urban modeling and SLEUTH

One of the major criticisms of the first generation of computer-based urban models was their specificity to the cities to which they were applied (Lee, 1973). It has taken a new generation of computational models, using very different methods, to escape this legacy. How global models reflect local characteristics is a central challenge if modeling is ever to move beyond the comparison of case studies. Therefore, an effort should be directed to an understanding of how increased spatial

Calibration of SLEUTH

The calibration of the SLEUTH model for Lisbon and Porto followed the techniques developed for the model as applied to the San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore areas (Clarke & Gaydos, 1998, Clarke et al., 1996, Clarke et al., 1997) and documented on the Internet at url: www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/gig. Version 2.1 of the model was downloaded from the web site. The program code is written in the C programming language, and supports three different modes: test, calibration, and prediction modes.

Case studies

The results of the calibration applied to the Lisbon Metropolitan Area and to the Porto Metropolitan Area (Fig. 1), are presented and then compared. In order to better understand the resulting metrics within the calibration results, the two metropolitan areas are first described. The metrics that best describe each system are explained in terms of their behavior according to the landscape characteristics and history. Finally, we compare the scores and coefficients of both metropolitan areas to

Case study A — Lisbon Metropolitan Area (AML)

The Lisbon Metropolitan Area contains 2 554 240 inhabitants in an area of 312 km2 for a population density of 817 people/km2. Population is concentrated mainly around the city of Lisbon, the central urban nucleus and then extends out along main roadways and railways (along the municipalities of Cascais, Oeiras, Amadora, and Vila Franca de Xira). Since early times it was clear that the capital of the country and its environs needed integrated planning. Therefore, a metropolitan plan was

Calibration results for the Lisbon Metropolitan Area

Results from the three phases of the calibration mode (Coarse, Fine, and Final calibrations) are presented in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3. Each table presents the sorted top five highest scoring results from thousands of model runs.

The values marked in bold define the composite results of the optimum values for the diffusion, spread, slope and road gravity parameters. The tables show successive improvement in the parameters that control the behavior of the system. From a set of initial control

Case study B — the Porto Metropolitan Area (AMP)

The Porto Metropolitan Area has a population of 1 196 850, an area of 817 km2, and a population density of 1464.1 people/km2 (AMP-INE, 1998). Porto is characterized by dispersed urban settlements with the highest densities in the municipalities of Porto, Vila Nova de Gaia, and Matosinhos. Just as in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, the last 25 years have also seen intense urbanization.

Two main time periods define the evolution of the Porto Metropolitan Area: the decades of the 1950s and the 1980s.

Self-Modification Rules

Finally, regarding the boom and bust phases that the mechanism of self-modification rules allows, how were they included in the calibration results when simulating urbanization to the present, or predicting the future (prediction mode)? To answer this question we ran parameter averaging on the best results from the final calibration. The self-modification qualities of the model alter coefficient values during a run. The finishing values of all the coefficients (located in a file called

Findings and discussion

Table 7 presents the selected calibration results for both metropolitan areas (the underlined values extracted from Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6). The two first lines give the composite scores one and two (all the scores multiplied together and a ratio comparison of model final urban areas to the actual urban area) the r2 values are the regression scores for urbanization, urban edges and urban clusters. And the final lines correspond to the five factors that control the

Conclusions

The most important finding from our calibration experiments is the fact that detailed and exhaustive calibration improves the performance of the SLEUTH model in a significant way. The most interesting finding is the observation of how these two different urban settings constrained the evolution of the three calibration phases in order to adjust the model more closely to the reality of each area.

Looking at the results (Fig. 4) one might deduce that in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, where growth

Recommendations for future research

We present the results of an exhaustive and rigorous calibration of the SLEUTH model to data from two Portuguese metropolitan areas. During the calibration process, several impediments to CA modeling were detected and, as a result of the experience, some recommendations for future research and improvements can be made.

First, data quality is one of the most important elements for a successful model calibration. This was observed in the slope layer and the 2000 urban extent layers for Porto,

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their gratitude to Jeannette Candau for assistance during model calibration. Some of the data that allowed this research was given by the Lisbon Metropolitan Area (AML), the Metropolitan Area of Porto (AMP) and University of Porto (Department of Civil Engineering). This research is the result of two grants: from 1998 to 1999 Luso-America Foundation; since January 2000, Portuguese National Science Foundation. Work was conducted while the primary author was a visiting

References (37)

  • M. Batty et al.

    Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata

    Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

    (1999)
  • C. Niccanna et al.

    The use of parallel virtual machine (PVM) for finite–difference wave simulations

    Computers & Geosciences

    (1997)
  • AMP, INE (1998). AMP (1998). Statistics. Lisbon: Metropolitan Area of Oporto (AMP) and National Bureau of Statistics...
  • H. Bahr

    Remote Sensing and Urban Analysis

  • M. Batty et al.

    Fractal cities. A geometry of form and function

    (1994)
  • M. Batty et al.

    From cells to cities

    Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

    (1994)
  • M. Batty et al.

    Modeling inside GIS: part 2. Selecting and calibrating urban models using Arc-Info

    International Journal of Geographic Information Systems

    (1994)
  • M. Birkin et al.

    Intelligent GIS. Locations decisions and strategic planning

    (1996)
  • F. Canters et al.

    Estimation of land-cover proportions from aggregated medium-resolution satellite data

  • A. Cardoso

    Do desenvolvimento do planeamento ao planeamento do desenvolvimento

    (1996)
  • J. Cihlar

    Land cover mapping of large areas from satellites: status and research priorities

    International Journal of Remote Sensing

    (2000)
  • K. Clarke

    Getting started with geographic information systems. Prentice Hall series in geographic information systems

    (1999)
  • K. Clarke et al.

    Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore

    International Journal of Geographical Information Science

    (1998)
  • Clarke, K., Hoppen, S., & Gaydos, L., (1996). Methods and techniques for rigorous calibration of cellular automaton...
  • K. Clarke et al.

    A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area

    Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

    (1997)
  • H. Couclelis

    From cellular automata to urban models: new principles for model development and implementation

    Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design

    (1997)
  • H. Couclelis

    Cellular worlds: a framework for modeling micro-macro dynamics

    Environment and Planning A

    (1985)
  • M. Fischer

    Spatial interaction models and the role of geographic information systems

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text