Article
Schedule-controlled brain self-stimulation: Has it utility for behavioral pharmacology?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(05)80197-6Get rights and content

We review evidence that schedule-controlled intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) has properties in common with conventional reinforcements, such as food and water, but unlike the latter, animals will respond for ICSS for long periods of time at a near-constant rate. Schedule-controlled ICSS has proven to be more sensitive to drug-induced changes than has ICSS on a continuous reinforcement schedule, and it permits a more fine-grained analysis of the pattern of responding that results in the reinforcement. Evidence is accumulating that the schedule of ICSS itself leads to neurochemical changes in areas of the brain, such as the nucleus accumbens, in which reward processes occur. Results obtained from schedule-controlled ICSS would complement those obtained by drug self-administration studies which generally use intermittent reinforcement. A systematic examination of ICSS schedules at different brain sites would greatly facilitate our interpretation of drug effects and this would have utility for behavioral pharmacology.

References (171)

  • CareyR.J. et al.

    Differential effects of d-amphetamine on fixed ratio 30 performance maintained by food versus brain stimulation reinforcement

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1974)
  • ClarkeS.

    Sniffing and fixed-ratio behavior for sucrose and brain stimulation reward in the rat

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1971)
  • ClarkeS. et al.

    Sniffing and motivated behavior in the rat

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1971)
  • DeWitteP.

    Perceptual cues of reinforcing brain stimulation in the postero-lateral area of the hypothalamus

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1982)
  • FranklinK.B.J. et al.

    Self-stimulation and catecholamines: Drug-induced mobilization of the “reserve”-pool re-establishes responding in catecholamine-depleted rats

    Brain Res.

    (1974)
  • FranklinK.B.J. et al.

    Self-stimulation and noradrenaline: Evidence that inhibition of synthesis abolishes responding only if the “reserve” pool is dispersed first

    Brain Res.

    (1975)
  • FranklinK.B.J. et al.

    Presynaptic alpha-adrenoceptors: The depression of self-stimulation by clonidine and its restoration by piperoxane but not by phentolamine or phenoxybenzamine

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1977)
  • FranklinK.B.J. et al.

    Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: Stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1979)
  • FranklinK.B.J. et al.

    5-HT blockade and the stimulant effect of d- and l-amphetamine: No interaction in self-stimulation of prefrontal cortex, hypothalamus, or dorsal tegmentum. Unexpected lethality in hippocampal sites

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1980)
  • FranklinK.B.J. et al.

    Effects and interactions of naloxone and amphetamine on self-stimulation of the prefrontal cortex and dorsal tegmentum

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1982)
  • GallistelC.R.

    Subcortical stimulation for motivation and reinforcement

  • GomitaY. et al.

    “Conflict” situation based on intracranial self-stimulation behavior and the effect of benzodiazepines

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1981)
  • GrayT. et al.

    Effects of pimozide on lever pressing behavior maintained on an intermittent reinforcement schedule

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1980)
  • GreenshawA.J. et al.

    The effects of pimozide and of reward omission on fixed-interval behavior of rats maintained by food and electrical brain stimulation

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1981)
  • GreenshawA.J. et al.

    Effects of d-amphetamine and of beta-phenylethylamine on fixed-interval responding maintained by self-regulated lateral hypothalamic stimulation in rats

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1985)
  • HallF.S. et al.

    Acute and chronic desipramine treatment effects on rewarding electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1990)
  • HamiltonA.L. et al.

    Reward, performance, and the response strength method in self-stimulating rats: Validation and neuroleptics

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1985)
  • HandT.H. et al.

    The influence of amphetamine on preference for lateral hypothalamic versus prefrontal cortex or ventral tegmental area self-stimulation

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1983)
  • HandT.H. et al.

    6-OHDA lesions of the ventral tegmental area block morphine-induced but not amphetamine-induced facilitation of self-stimulation

    Brain Res.

    (1985)
  • HarrisR.A. et al.

    Interactions between naltrexone and non-opiate drugs evaluated by schedule-controlled behavior

    Neuropharmacology

    (1980)
  • HarveyJ.A.

    Behavioral pharmacology of central nervous system stimulants

    Neuropharmacology

    (1987)
  • HeffnerT.G. et al.

    Synthesis of catecholamines from [3H]tyrosine in brain during the performance of operant behavior

    Brain Res.

    (1980)
  • HerbergL.J. et al.

    The stimulant action of tryptophan-monoamine oxidase inhibitor combinations: Suppression of self-stimulation

    Neuropharmacology

    (1976)
  • HerbergL.J. et al.

    Excitatory amino acid pathways in brain-stimulation reward

    Behav. Brain. Res.

    (1990)
  • HerbergL.J. et al.

    Effects of d-cycloserine and cycloleucine, ligands for the NMDA-associated strychnine-insensitive glycine site, on brain-stimulation reward and spontaneous locomotion

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1990)
  • HerbergL.J. et al.

    Catecholamines and self-stimulation: The action of amantadine and its interaction with amphetamine

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1975)
  • HerbergL.J. et al.

    Catecholamines and self-stimulation: Evidence suggesting a reinforcing role for noradrenaline and a motivating role for dopamine

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1976)
  • HerbergL.J. et al.

    Anti-conflict and depressant effects by GABA agonists and antagonists, benzodiazepines and non-gabergic anticonvulsants on self-stimulation and locomotor activity

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1983)
  • HerbergL.J. et al.

    Selective permeation of the blood-brain barrier as a cause of the anomalous properties of ‘atypical’ neuroleptics

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1980)
  • HerbergL.J. et al.

    Self-stimulation and locomotor changes indicating “latent” anticholinergic activity by an atypical neuroleptic (thioridazine)

    Neuropharmacology

    (1981)
  • HurshS.R. et al.

    Electrical brain stimulation and food reinforcement dissociated by demand elasticity

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1981)
  • HurwitzH.M.B. et al.

    Deferment of intracranial reinforcement: Incentive power of ICS

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1970)
  • HustonJ.P.

    Relationship between motivating and rewarding stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1971)
  • HustonJ.P. et al.

    Interspecies aggression during fixed-ratio hypothalamic self-stimulation in rats

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1971)
  • HustonJ.P. et al.

    Strength-duration function of hypothalamic self-stimulation

    Behav. Biol.

    (1972)
  • Adam-CarriereD. et al.

    Effects of morphine, naloxone, d,1-cyclazocine, and d-amphetamine on behaviour controlled by a schedule of interresponse time reinforcement

    Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.

    (1978)
  • BarrettJ.E.

    Comparison of the effects of antipsychotic drugs on the schedule-controlled behavior of squirrel monkeys and pigeons

    Neuropharmacology

    (1983)
  • BeerB. et al.

    Rate of intracranial self-stimulation as a function of reinforcement magnitude and density

    Psychonom. Sci.

    (1964)
  • BeningerR.J. et al.

    Schedule control of behavior reinforced by electrical stimulation of the brain

    Science

    (1977)
  • BeningerR.J. et al.

    Brain stimulation reinforcement: Implications of an electrode artifact

    Science

    (1979)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Utility of Intracranial Self-Stimulation in the Assessment of the Abuse Liability of New Pharmaceuticals

      2015, Nonclinical Assessment of Abuse Potential for New Pharmaceuticals
    • Stimulation of α2-adrenergic receptors in the central nucleus of the amygdala attenuates stress-induced reinstatement of nicotine seeking in rats

      2011, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, nicotine induces conditioned place preference and facilitates intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) in rats (Harrison et al., 2002; Le Foll and Goldberg, 2005; Pradhan and Bowling, 1971). Conditioned place preference and facilitation of ICSS are indicative of a potentiation of brain reward function (Bardo and Bevins, 2000; Schaefer and Michael, 1992). Nicotine mediates its positive reinforcing effects (e.g., mild euphoria) at least partly via the activation of central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs).

    • Developing new drugs for schizophrenia: From animals to the clinic

      2008, Animal and Translational Models for CNS Drug Discovery
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text