Elsevier

Women's Health Issues

Volume 14, Issue 6, November–December 2004, Pages 242-247
Women's Health Issues

Validating a pencil-and-paper measure of perimenopausal menstrual blood loss

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2004.07.005Get rights and content

In the study presented here, we describe our efforts to develop and validate a new measurement tool for perimenopausal menstrual blood loss. We validate this simple-to-use, subjective pencil-and-paper scale, the Mansfield-Voda-Jorgensen Menstrual Bleeding Scale (MVJ), against an objective measure, the weight of used menstrual products. Thirty-one women from the Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN region saved all their used products over three menstrual cycles, storing them in airtight zip bags, and rated their menstrual fluid volume loss using the MVJ. The overall correlation between MVJ scores and log discharge rate was quite high (r = 0.683); all MVJ categories were statistically unique with the exception of categories “1” and “2.” The overall fit, then, was particularly good at the heavy bleeding end of the scale. When five women with poor performance were removed, the correlations ranged from 0.480–0.894. The MVJ is a promising tool for identifying women with excessive menstrual bleeding. It is a simple-to-use, pencil-and-paper scale that offers an inexpensive and practical method to clinicians who work with perimenopausal women, the group most vulnerable to unnecessary worry and/or interventions when menorrhagia is incorrectly diagnosed.

Section snippets

Introduction and background

Irregular and heavy menstrual bleeding are common gynecological complaints of perimenopausal women (Mansfield & Boyer, 1990; Mansfield & Voda, 1997; Roy & Mattox, 2003; Warren, 2002). Too often, a woman’s report of “heavy bleeding” is transformed into a clinical diagnosis of menorrhagia, which, by definition, is menstrual blood loss of ≥80 mL per cycle (Fraser et al., 1985; Hallberg & Nilsson, 1966; Hallberg et al., 1966; Janssen, Scholten, & Heintz, 1997; Roy & Mattox, 2003; Warren, 2002). A

Sample

From a list of 180 participants of the TREMIN Research Program on Women’s Health (formerly Alan Treloar’s Menstrual and Reproductive History Program), 40 women were randomly chosen to participate in this special study and received invitations by phone. All of the eligible participants lived in the Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota area, were between the ages of 35 and 55, were still menstruating, and were not using exogenous hormones. TREMIN is the oldest ongoing research program of women’s

Results

Thirty-one women completed the study. One participant dropped out because she had a hysterectomy. The mean age of the participants was 47.6 years (range 38–52). Women selected 28 different brands of tampons and pads for use during the three menstrual cycles of this study. If we include different absorbencies of those brands selected by the participants, that figure rises to 87. The average number of products used by participants was 48.3 (SD = 24.4)

Although our sample was selected randomly and

Discussion

In this study, we tested the validity of the MVJ by comparing the scale ratings selected by participants to describe the magnitude of blood loss against an objective measure, the weight of used menstrual products. Work by Fraser et al. (2001) confirmed that the weight of total menstrual volume is an accurate method to use to estimate the volume of blood lost. The findings of our study confirm that the MVJ is a valid way to estimate menstrual fluid volume loss. The overall fit is particularly

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part by Tambrands, Inc. and Public Health Service Research Grant No. RR-64 from the Division of Research Resources, U.S. Public Health Service.

Phyllis Kernoff Mansfield, PhD, is a professor of Women’s Studies and Health Education, and senior scientist at the Population Research Institute at Penn State. Her research interests include women’s health, the reproductive concerns of midlife women, sexuality, and the psychology of health. She is the Director of the TREMIN Research Program on Women’s Health and co-director of the Midlife Women’s Health Survey and serves on the board of directors of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research.

References (31)

  • L. Hallberg et al.

    Menstrual blood lossa population study

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

    (1966)
  • L. Hallberg et al.

    Constancy of individual menstrual blood loss

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

    (1964)
  • L. Hallberg et al.

    Determination of menstrual blood loss

    Scandinavian Journal of Clinical Laboratory Investigation

    (1966)
  • P.T. Haynes et al.

    Measurements of menstrual blood loss in patients complaining of menorrhagia

    British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

    (1977)
  • A.-L.M. Heath et al.

    Validation of a questionnaire method for estimating extent of menstrual blood loss in young adult women

    Journal of Trace Elements in Medical Biology

    (1998)
  • Cited by (43)

    • Development and initial validation of an electronic personal assessment questionnaire for menstrual, pelvic pain and gynaecological hormonal disorders (ePAQ-MPH)

      2019, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A number of PROMs have been described for use in women with menstrual, pelvic pain and gynaecological hormonal disorders. However, existing instruments are either condition specific [13–15] or limited to one symptom area of menstrual disorders; specifically assessing heavy menstrual bleeding [16–18], pelvic pain [19], sexual function [20], health related quality-of-life [21–24] or premenstrual syndrome alone. [25–28]. The majority of instruments are paper-based, adding a significant administrative burden to their use in clinical practice [29].

    • Conservative surgery of diffuse adenomyosis with TOUA: Single surgeon experience of one hundred sixteen cases and report of fertility outcomes

      2018, Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      The aims of conservative surgical treatment of diffuse adenomyosis are fertility preservation, relief of severe menstrual symptoms during the patient's life without medication, and improvement in the stability of the patient's mind such that she preserves not only her uterus but also her femininity, especially Asian women. However, there are few reports supporting the use of conservative surgical adenomyomectomy and the number of cases that underwent adenomyomectomy was insufficient for clinical analysis of efficacy, safety, clinical outcomes, and pregnancy-related outcomes of adenomyomectomy via laparoscopy or laparotomy [1–9]. Especially, there are extremely rare reports supporting conservative surgical adenomyomectomy in patients with diffuse uterine adenomyosis that invades more than half of the total uterine myometrium or involves the whole uterus [2].

    • Elagolix for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids: results from a phase 2a proof-of-concept study

      2017, Fertility and Sterility
      Citation Excerpt :

      Sanitary products were collected at screening and for any spotting or bleeding episodes that occurred during treatment. Additionally, electronic daily bleeding diary (eDiary) data were used from screening through 3 months after treatment to assess bleeding patterns, using the validated Mansfield-Voda-Jorgenson Menstrual Bleeding Scale (29) for this purpose. This diary included six bleeding categories, as described by Mansfield et al (29).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Phyllis Kernoff Mansfield, PhD, is a professor of Women’s Studies and Health Education, and senior scientist at the Population Research Institute at Penn State. Her research interests include women’s health, the reproductive concerns of midlife women, sexuality, and the psychology of health. She is the Director of the TREMIN Research Program on Women’s Health and co-director of the Midlife Women’s Health Survey and serves on the board of directors of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research.

    Ann Voda was the second director of the TREMIN Research Program on Women’s Health from 1984 to 1998 at the University of Utah. She is a former president of the North American Menopause Society.

    Dr. Gary Allison focuses on computationally intensive analyses of large datasets in fields ranging from bioinformatics to ecology and conservation.

    View full text