Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 23, Issue 25, 9 May 2005, Pages 3329-3335
Vaccine

Attitudes and risk perception of parents of different ethnic backgrounds regarding meningococcal C vaccination

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.01.075Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to assess the attitudes of parents toward vaccination as well as their risk perception of disease and vaccination. We interviewed 1763 parents of different ethnic groups (among others, Dutch, Turkish, Moroccan, and Surinamese parents). Results show that there were large differences in knowledge about disease and risk perception of disease and vaccination among parents of different ethnic backgrounds. Generally, people largely overestimated the risk of contracting the disease and the risk of dying after contracting the disease. Dutch parents were best informed, least worried, had the most critical attitude toward the campaign, and the lowest vaccination level compared to other parents. The differences in knowledge about vaccination and the more critical attitude of Dutch parents emphasize the need to take more into account parents’ perspectives when designing information leaflets or other information media.

Introduction

Although the National Vaccination Program in the Netherlands has been successful, and about 95% of Dutch children receive the recommended vaccinations [1], [2], there is some concern that the compliance is decreasing. Some of the larger cities in the Netherlands show a decrease in vaccination level, especially among infants and especially among infants of Dutch descent [1]. This decrease in vaccination level is a worldwide concern [3]. If the vaccination level decreases even further, it is likely that the number of cases of infectious diseases will increase as happened in the past in, for example, the Netherlands (measles) and the UK (pertussis) [4], [5]. Traditionally, opponents of vaccination generally use religious arguments or they base their arguments on anthroposophical ideas [6], [7]. There are also other reasons why parents feel ambivalent toward immunization [8]. The declining incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases has led to a heightened public focus on the issue of vaccine safety, and parents may overestimate the risk of side effects of vaccination or harbor doubts about its effectiveness [9], [10], [11]. Without having any direct experience of the severe consequences of infectious diseases, risks of vaccination are sometimes seen as greater than the risks of non-immunization [9]. Parents’ appraisal of the various risks of vaccination might therefore differ from that of health professionals [12].

As there are ethnic differences in healthcare use in general [13], ethnicity may also play a role in parents’ attitudes toward childhood vaccination and compliance with vaccination. Some studies [14], [15], [16] showed ethnic differences in vaccination coverage, while other studies did not [17]. Streefland et al. [2] noted that immigrants in the Netherlands often see vaccination as something self-evident, suggesting that their compliance might be even higher than that of Dutch parents. However, the few studies that have been done about attitudes toward vaccination of parents with different ethnic backgrounds (e.g. [18]) did not reveal any differences. In the Netherlands, many people from ethnic minority groups live in the four largest cities (about 30% of the total population), while in other parts of the Netherlands 10% of the population, at most, is from the ethnic minorities [19]. The largest ethnic minority groups are Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese people and people from the Antilles. Surinam is a former part of the Netherlands and many people moved from Surinam to the Netherlands when Surinam became independent. The Antilles is still a part of the Netherlands. People from Morocco and Turkey came to the Netherlands (from 1965 onwards) to find employment.

Learning more about parents’ concerns about, and attitude toward vaccination is important when designing more effective informational material. In this study, we focus on the appraisal of vaccination risks of parents with different ethnic backgrounds, and their attitude toward vaccination. We were able to interview parents who enrolled their children for vaccination against meningococcal C during the 2002 large-scale one-time catch-up vaccination campaign for children aged between 14 months and 18 years old in the Netherlands. For this study, we asked parents about their perceptions of the risks of disease, side effects of vaccination, and their evaluation of the vaccination campaign.

Section snippets

Subjects and procedure

As part of the vaccination catch-up campaign, all children in Amsterdam aged 6–14 years old (approximately 68,000), were invited by mail for a vaccination against group-C meningococci on September 3rd and 4th, 2002. Children 5 years old and younger and children aged 15–18 were invited for a meningococcal vaccination a few months earlier. Accompanying each invitational letter was an information leaflet describing clinical aspects of a meningococcal infection (causing meningitis and/or sepsis)

Participants

A total of 2910 parents and their children were approached by the interviewers. Of these, 61% (1763/2910) agreed to participate in the interview. There were no significant differences in uptake between day 1 and day 2 (63% versus 59%) or between men and women (55% versus 60%). Most parents (69%) reported lack of time as their main reason for refusing the interview, 19% did not understand the Dutch language, 5% did not feel like being interviewed, in 4% of the cases, the person approached was

Discussion

Overall, the vaccination rate was rather high, with the highest degree of vaccinated children among parents of Moroccan descent. The figures of vaccination compliance are in accordance with the vaccination rates of the population in the Netherlands as a whole [20]. Parents’ knowledge about the disease for which the vaccination was given was adequate overall, and most parents had read the information leaflet. However, Moroccan and Antilles parents and lower educated parents read the leaflet less

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the parents for their cooperation with the interviews and the staff of the Municipal Health Service Amsterdam for their assistance in carrying out this study, especially Mr. Ties Pel and Mrs. Diewke Ram.

References (27)

  • M.S. Smailbegovic et al.

    Why do parents decide against immunization? The effects of health beliefs and health professionals

    Child Care Health Dev

    (2003)
  • N. Raithatha et al.

    A qualitative investigation of vaccine risk perception amongst parents who immunize their children: a matter of public health concern

    J Public Health Med

    (2003)
  • P. Bellaby

    Communication and miscommunication of risk: understanding UK parents’ attitudes to combined MMR vaccination

    BMJ

    (2003)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Household decision-making for the MenACWY vaccination: How parents and adolescents deal with an adolescent vaccination decision

      2021, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Parental decision-making concerning childhood vaccinations has been widely researched [12–16], including a number of studies focussed specifically on decisions regarding vaccination against meningococcal disease [17–20]. Studies concerning adolescent vaccinations have covered either parental or adolescent perspectives separately or incorporated both into a comparison of the two [3,17–27]. Concerning MenACWY, there has been little research to offer insight into the inter-household dynamics when confronted with this type of decision and who is actually involved in the decision-making process.

    • MenACWY vaccination campaign for adolescents in the Netherlands: Uptake and its determinants

      2020, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, objection to vaccination in general is not a likely explanation for the low MenACWY-vaccine uptake observed among adolescents with parents born abroad. One hypothesis is that, perhaps due to language barriers, these groups might have been less aware of the importance of vaccination against IMD serogroup W or might not have read or completely understood the content of the invitation letter [40,41]. Furthermore, at adolescent age the contact with YHCs is very limited compared with that at childhood age, leaving fewer options to discuss vaccination and arrange catch-up of missed vaccinations [42,43].

    • Community, parental and adolescent awareness and knowledge of meningococcal disease

      2014, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      As an online survey, study results were subject to selection bias with limited generalisability of the study results. Two other studies in the Netherlands and Auckland have also assessed parental awareness of IMD and suggested that the vast majority of parents were aware of the severity of IMD and that perceived vulnerability was associated with a more positive attitude towards vaccination, however these studies are both limited by selection bias and may not be generalisable to the population [16–18]. This current, large population study aimed to assess knowledge and concern about IMD and perception of disease severity, incidence and susceptibility in the South Australian community and determine factors associated with lower or higher knowledge and concern prior to the introduction of the new MenB vaccine.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text