Attitudes and risk perception of parents of different ethnic backgrounds regarding meningococcal C vaccination
Introduction
Although the National Vaccination Program in the Netherlands has been successful, and about 95% of Dutch children receive the recommended vaccinations [1], [2], there is some concern that the compliance is decreasing. Some of the larger cities in the Netherlands show a decrease in vaccination level, especially among infants and especially among infants of Dutch descent [1]. This decrease in vaccination level is a worldwide concern [3]. If the vaccination level decreases even further, it is likely that the number of cases of infectious diseases will increase as happened in the past in, for example, the Netherlands (measles) and the UK (pertussis) [4], [5]. Traditionally, opponents of vaccination generally use religious arguments or they base their arguments on anthroposophical ideas [6], [7]. There are also other reasons why parents feel ambivalent toward immunization [8]. The declining incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases has led to a heightened public focus on the issue of vaccine safety, and parents may overestimate the risk of side effects of vaccination or harbor doubts about its effectiveness [9], [10], [11]. Without having any direct experience of the severe consequences of infectious diseases, risks of vaccination are sometimes seen as greater than the risks of non-immunization [9]. Parents’ appraisal of the various risks of vaccination might therefore differ from that of health professionals [12].
As there are ethnic differences in healthcare use in general [13], ethnicity may also play a role in parents’ attitudes toward childhood vaccination and compliance with vaccination. Some studies [14], [15], [16] showed ethnic differences in vaccination coverage, while other studies did not [17]. Streefland et al. [2] noted that immigrants in the Netherlands often see vaccination as something self-evident, suggesting that their compliance might be even higher than that of Dutch parents. However, the few studies that have been done about attitudes toward vaccination of parents with different ethnic backgrounds (e.g. [18]) did not reveal any differences. In the Netherlands, many people from ethnic minority groups live in the four largest cities (about 30% of the total population), while in other parts of the Netherlands 10% of the population, at most, is from the ethnic minorities [19]. The largest ethnic minority groups are Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese people and people from the Antilles. Surinam is a former part of the Netherlands and many people moved from Surinam to the Netherlands when Surinam became independent. The Antilles is still a part of the Netherlands. People from Morocco and Turkey came to the Netherlands (from 1965 onwards) to find employment.
Learning more about parents’ concerns about, and attitude toward vaccination is important when designing more effective informational material. In this study, we focus on the appraisal of vaccination risks of parents with different ethnic backgrounds, and their attitude toward vaccination. We were able to interview parents who enrolled their children for vaccination against meningococcal C during the 2002 large-scale one-time catch-up vaccination campaign for children aged between 14 months and 18 years old in the Netherlands. For this study, we asked parents about their perceptions of the risks of disease, side effects of vaccination, and their evaluation of the vaccination campaign.
Section snippets
Subjects and procedure
As part of the vaccination catch-up campaign, all children in Amsterdam aged 6–14 years old (approximately 68,000), were invited by mail for a vaccination against group-C meningococci on September 3rd and 4th, 2002. Children 5 years old and younger and children aged 15–18 were invited for a meningococcal vaccination a few months earlier. Accompanying each invitational letter was an information leaflet describing clinical aspects of a meningococcal infection (causing meningitis and/or sepsis)
Participants
A total of 2910 parents and their children were approached by the interviewers. Of these, 61% (1763/2910) agreed to participate in the interview. There were no significant differences in uptake between day 1 and day 2 (63% versus 59%) or between men and women (55% versus 60%). Most parents (69%) reported lack of time as their main reason for refusing the interview, 19% did not understand the Dutch language, 5% did not feel like being interviewed, in 4% of the cases, the person approached was
Discussion
Overall, the vaccination rate was rather high, with the highest degree of vaccinated children among parents of Moroccan descent. The figures of vaccination compliance are in accordance with the vaccination rates of the population in the Netherlands as a whole [20]. Parents’ knowledge about the disease for which the vaccination was given was adequate overall, and most parents had read the information leaflet. However, Moroccan and Antilles parents and lower educated parents read the leaflet less
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the parents for their cooperation with the interviews and the staff of the Municipal Health Service Amsterdam for their assistance in carrying out this study, especially Mr. Ties Pel and Mrs. Diewke Ram.
References (27)
- et al.
Patterns of vaccination acceptance
Soc Sci Med
(1999) Public doubts about vaccination safety and resistance against vaccination
Health Policy
(2001)- et al.
Impact of anti-vaccine movements on pertussis control: the untold story
Lancet
(1998) - et al.
Understanding those who do not understand: a brief review of the anti-vaccines movement
Vaccine
(2001) - et al.
Cognitive processes and the decision of some parents to forego pertussis vaccination for their children
J Clin Epidemiol
(1996) - Inspection of Health Care (IGZ). State of vaccination in the Netherlands at 1 January 2003. Report of the Inspection of...
- et al.
Measles outbreak in a community with very low vaccine coverage, the Netherlands
Emerg Infect Dis
(2001) - et al.
Anti-vaccinationists past and present
BMJ
(2002) - et al.
Reasons for non-uptake of measles, mumps, and rubella catch up immunisation in a measles epidemic and side effects of the vaccine
BMJ
(1995) - et al.
Parents’ perspectives on the MMR immunisation: a focus group study
Br J Gen Pract
(2001)
Why do parents decide against immunization? The effects of health beliefs and health professionals
Child Care Health Dev
A qualitative investigation of vaccine risk perception amongst parents who immunize their children: a matter of public health concern
J Public Health Med
Communication and miscommunication of risk: understanding UK parents’ attitudes to combined MMR vaccination
BMJ
Cited by (33)
Household decision-making for the MenACWY vaccination: How parents and adolescents deal with an adolescent vaccination decision
2021, VaccineCitation Excerpt :Parental decision-making concerning childhood vaccinations has been widely researched [12–16], including a number of studies focussed specifically on decisions regarding vaccination against meningococcal disease [17–20]. Studies concerning adolescent vaccinations have covered either parental or adolescent perspectives separately or incorporated both into a comparison of the two [3,17–27]. Concerning MenACWY, there has been little research to offer insight into the inter-household dynamics when confronted with this type of decision and who is actually involved in the decision-making process.
MenACWY vaccination campaign for adolescents in the Netherlands: Uptake and its determinants
2020, VaccineCitation Excerpt :Therefore, objection to vaccination in general is not a likely explanation for the low MenACWY-vaccine uptake observed among adolescents with parents born abroad. One hypothesis is that, perhaps due to language barriers, these groups might have been less aware of the importance of vaccination against IMD serogroup W or might not have read or completely understood the content of the invitation letter [40,41]. Furthermore, at adolescent age the contact with YHCs is very limited compared with that at childhood age, leaving fewer options to discuss vaccination and arrange catch-up of missed vaccinations [42,43].
Community, parental and adolescent awareness and knowledge of meningococcal disease
2014, VaccineCitation Excerpt :As an online survey, study results were subject to selection bias with limited generalisability of the study results. Two other studies in the Netherlands and Auckland have also assessed parental awareness of IMD and suggested that the vast majority of parents were aware of the severity of IMD and that perceived vulnerability was associated with a more positive attitude towards vaccination, however these studies are both limited by selection bias and may not be generalisable to the population [16–18]. This current, large population study aimed to assess knowledge and concern about IMD and perception of disease severity, incidence and susceptibility in the South Australian community and determine factors associated with lower or higher knowledge and concern prior to the introduction of the new MenB vaccine.
Harnessing the power of cultural health narratives when working with parents of young children
2019, Children AustraliaA Tale of Two Cities: COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy as a Result of Racial, Socioeconomic, Digital, and Partisan Divides
2023, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information