Trends in Genetics
Volume 27, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 63-71
Journal home page for Trends in Genetics

Review
Genome organization influences partner selection for chromosomal rearrangements

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2010.11.001Get rights and content

Chromosomal rearrangements occur as a consequence of the erroneous repair of DNA double-stranded breaks, and often underlie disease. The recurrent detection of specific tumorigenic rearrangements suggests that there is a mechanism behind chromosomal partner selection involving the shape of the genome. With the advent of novel high-throughput approaches, detailed genome integrity and folding maps are becoming available. Integrating these data with knowledge of experimentally induced DNA recombination strongly suggests that partner choice in chromosomal rearrangement primarily follows the three-dimensional conformation of the genome. Local rearrangements are favored over distal and interchromosomal rearrangements. This is seen for neutral rearrangements, but not necessarily for rearrangements that drive oncogenesis. The recurrent detection of tumorigenic rearrangements probably reflects their exceptional capacity to confer growth advantage to the rare cells that contain them. The abundant presence of neutral rearrangements suggests that somatic genome variation is also common in healthy tissue.

Section snippets

Mechanisms underlying partner selection in chromosomal rearrangements

Chromosomal rearrangements underlie a variety of malignant cancers and congenital diseases. Such cancers and diseases can occur if: (i) crucial genes are disrupted; (ii) novel oncogenes are created through illegitimate gene fusion; or (iii) crucial genes are placed under the control of new transcription regulatory DNA elements owing to position effects [1]. It is less probable that rearrangements that do not affect the expression of such genes will alter a phenotype; therefore, such

DSB formation: at preferred or random genomic locations?

The first requirement for a chromosomal rearrangement to occur is the generation of DSBs in the loci involved (Box 1). DNA-damaging agents, such as endogenously generated reactive oxygen species, radiation or damaging chemical agents, can form breaks in all cells. DNA breaks can also be formed during processes such as meiotic crossing over and stalling of the replication fork upon encountering a damaged DNA template during S-phase. In addition, B and T cells harbor special protein machineries

A role for chromatin mobility in finding translocation partners

After DSB formation, two broken DNA ends need to find each other in the nuclear space to be ligated. A major question therefore is: what freedom do chromosomal segments have to move and search the nuclear interior for rearrangement partners? This question has been investigated by elegant studies that involved tracking chromatin and even selected DNA loci. In Drosophila and mammals, the mobility of undamaged DNA was found to be constrained in the interphase nucleus of living cells, with

3D organization of the genome

Current understanding of the 3D organization inside the cell nucleus traditionally comes from microscopy studies. Classic electron microscopy studies have already revealed that compact heterochromatin separates in the nucleus from more open euchromatin, with heterochromatin preferentially locating at the periphery of the nucleus and around the nucleolus. At the subchromosomal level, a similar separation between active and inactive chromatin was observed when alternating domains on a chromosomal

Lessons from chromosome engineering technologies

One way to manipulate the genome and study its function is to use naturally occurring site-specific recombination enzymes in species or cells that lack their orthologs. The best-known example is Cre recombinase, originating from bacteriophage P1, which mediates recombination between two distant 34 base-pair loxP sites. FLP–FRT is a similar system isolated from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where flippase (FLP) is the recombination enzyme that acts on flippase recognition target (FRT) sites.

A role for nuclear proximity in partner selection

Given the above, and in view of the limited mobility of broken DNA loci, it might be expected that partner selection during recombination after damage-induced DSBs is also primarily dictated by the 3D structure of the genome. Various studies have tried to investigate this, focusing on rearrangements known to drive a variety of cancers (reviewed in [68]). Both at the chromosomal 40, 69, 70, 71 and individual gene loci levels, partners involved in translocations were found to already be in

Uncovering genomic rearrangements using high-throughput DNA sequencing

In recent years, advances in new DNA-sequencing methods have resulted in high-throughput technologies that enable ever-more sequences to be read in fewer days for an ever-decreasing price, facilitating the analysis of genetic variations among, and between, healthy and diseased individuals in increasing detail 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91. When focusing on cancer, the picture emerging is that cancers are genetically much more complex than was previously anticipated. They all carry somatic

Concluding remarks and perspectives

One important outcome of the deep sequencing projects is the understanding that cancer genomes often carry many passenger rearrangements. It is crucial to realize that the detection of a rearrangement requires its presence in the majority of cells analyzed, independent of the rearrangement type and the sequencing method used. Passenger rearrangements that result from genomic instability at later stages of tumor growth and that exist in only small subpopulations of cells will therefore not be

Acknowledgments

We like to thank Elzo de Wit for preparing Figure 2. This work was financially supported by grants from the Dutch Scientific Organization (NWO) (91204082 and 935170621) and a European Research Council Starting Grant (209700, ‘4C’) to WdL.

References (99)

  • D. Gerlich

    Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells

    Cell

    (2003)
  • I. Thomson

    The radial positioning of chromatin is not inherited through mitosis but is established de novo in early G1

    Curr. Biol.

    (2004)
  • J.A. Kaye

    DNA breaks promote genomic instability by impeding proper chromosome segregation

    Curr. Biol.

    (2004)
  • K. Lobachev

    Chromosome fragmentation after induction of a double-strand break is an active process prevented by the RMX repair complex

    Curr. Biol.

    (2004)
  • K.E. Brown

    Association of transcriptionally silent genes with Ikaros complexes at centromeric heterochromatin

    Cell

    (1997)
  • M. Lundgren

    Transcription factor dosage affects changes in higher order chromatin structure associated with activation of a heterochromatic gene

    Cell

    (2000)
  • K. Rippe

    Action at a distance: DNA-looping and initiation of transcription

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (1995)
  • B. Tolhuis

    Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus

    Mol. Cell

    (2002)
  • K.J. Meaburn

    Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations

    Semin. Cancer Biol.

    (2007)
  • L.A. Parada

    Conservation of relative chromosome positioning in normal and cancer cells

    Curr. Biol.

    (2002)
  • H. Neves

    The nuclear topography of ABL, BCR, PML, and RARalpha genes: evidence for gene proximity in specific phases of the cell cycle and stages of hematopoietic differentiation

    Blood

    (1999)
  • C. Lin

    Nuclear receptor-induced chromosomal proximity and DNA breaks underlie specific translocations in cancer

    Cell

    (2009)
  • K.A. Bernstein et al.

    At loose ends: resecting a double-strand break

    Cell

    (2009)
  • S.A. Tomlins

    Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer

    Science

    (2005)
  • I.G. Cowell

    gammaH2AX foci form preferentially in euchromatin after ionising-radiation

    PLoS One

    (2007)
  • E. Gazave

    Does radial nuclear organisation influence DNA damage?

    Chromosome Res.

    (2005)
  • J.A. Kim

    Heterochromatin is refractory to gamma-H2AX modification in yeast and mammals

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2007)
  • W. Martinez-Lopez

    Intrachromosomal localization of aberration breakpoints induced by neutrons and gamma rays in Chinese hamster ovary cells

    Radiat. Res.

    (1998)
  • S.G. Durkin et al.

    Chromosome fragile sites

    Annu. Rev. Genet.

    (2007)
  • M. Gandhi

    Interphase chromosome folding determines spatial proximity of genes participating in carcinogenic RET/PTC rearrangements

    Oncogene

    (2006)
  • J. Stavnezer

    Mechanism and regulation of class switch recombination

    Annu. Rev. Immunol.

    (2008)
  • M. Jankovic

    Role of the translocation partner in protection against AID-dependent chromosomal translocations

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2010)
  • R. Bransteitter

    Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates deoxycytidine on single-stranded DNA but requires the action of RNase

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2003)
  • P. Pham

    Processive AID-catalysed cytosine deamination on single-stranded DNA simulates somatic hypermutation

    Nature

    (2003)
  • T. Tumbar et al.

    Interphase movements of a DNA chromosome region modulated by VP16 transcriptional activator

    Nat. Cell Biol.

    (2001)
  • J.R. Abney

    Chromatin dynamics in interphase nuclei and its implications for nuclear structure

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1997)
  • J. Essers

    Dynamics of relative chromosome position during the cell cycle

    Mol. Biol. Cell

    (2005)
  • J. Walter

    Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2003)
  • N. Dimitrova

    53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility

    Nature

    (2008)
  • C. Molenaar

    Visualizing telomere dynamics in living mammalian cells using PNA probes

    EMBO J.

    (2003)
  • X. Wang

    Rapid telomere motions in live human cells analysed by highly time-resolved microscopy

    Epigenetics Chromatin

    (2008)
  • M.J. Kruhlak

    Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2006)
  • B.E. Nelms

    In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts

    Science

    (1998)
  • E. Soutoglou

    Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells

    Nat. Cell Biol.

    (2007)
  • J.A. Aten

    Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains

    Science

    (2004)
  • J. Dekker

    Capturing chromosome conformation

    Science

    (2002)
  • L.S. Shopland

    Folding and organization of a contiguous chromosome region according to the gene distribution pattern in primary genomic sequence

    J. Cell Biol.

    (2006)
  • A. Bolzer

    Three-dimensional maps of all chromosomes in human male fibroblast nuclei and prometaphase rosettes

    PLoS Biol.

    (2005)
  • M.R. Branco et al.

    Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations

    PLoS Biol.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Human genomic variants and inherited disease: Molecular mechanisms and clinical consequences

      2018, Emery and Rimoin's Principles and Practice of Medical Genetics and Genomics: Foundations
    • 3D view of chromosomes, DNA damage, and translocations

      2014, Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example B lymphocyte activation, which is mediated by a global amplification of gene expression [52], does not change the interactomes of c-myc or IgH [53••]. Interaction frequency at the level of high-order genome organization has important mechanistic implications for chromosomal translocations [54–56]. Indeed, studies that have looked at the relative 3D position of known translocation partners in different types of cancers using FISH found that they are preferentially proximal in the normal cells in a tissue specific manner [57–68].

    • Identical cells with different 3D genomes; cause and consequences?

      2013, Current Opinion in Genetics and Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      The same site was found to rearrange with many different partners in different cells. The genomic distribution of these untargeted rearrangements strikingly corresponded to the chromosomal sites that were found contacting this site across the cell population [51••,52••,53,54] (see also [55]). This suggests that different cells select different rearrangement partners depending on their individual 3D genome structure.

    • Transcription factories, chromatin loops, and the dysregulation of gene expression in malignancy

      2013, Seminars in Cancer Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Both loci are often found together in 3D nuclear space in the relevant cells [62], and 3C and FISH show they often share the same specialized factory [63]–presumably because they require the same transcription factors. Then, it is easy to imagine that tethering in close proximity should increase the frequency with which the critical initiating translocation occurs [64,65]. Therefore, it would seem sensible to analyze systematically whether the translocation partners involved in initiating other malignancies are similarly co-transcribed in specialized factories, and–if they are–characterize the genes, transcripts, and proteins associated with those factories using the approaches described above.

    • Human Gene Mutation in Inherited Disease: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Consequences

      2013, Emery and Rimoin's Principles and Practice of Medical Genetics
    • Determining long-range chromatin interactions for selected genomic sites using 4C-seq technology: From fixation to computation

      2012, Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Routinely for each experiment the percentage of reads on the viewpoint chromosome over all reads is calculated, where only experiments that have >50% intrachromosomal reads are considered suitable for further analysis. A detailed example of the decline in local capture frequencies has been described previously [21]. Generating chromosomal maps and percentages of intrachromosomal reads should be standard procedure for every 4C experiment.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text