Therapeutic Lymph Node DissectionLymph Node Dissection in Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Neoplasms
Section snippets
Choice of surgical access
The type of surgical access contributes not only to postoperative morbidity and mortality rates but also to a large extent the ability to perform an extensive lymphadenectomy. The relative merits of transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for cancer of the esophagus are addressed in many studies. Transhiatal resection has the potential benefits of being less invasive and faster. The lack of a thoracotomy may reduce postoperative pain and enhance postoperative recovery, especially regarding
Lymphadenectomy: the rationale
The esophageal wall has a rich network of submucosal lymphatics and, thus, is prone to longitudinal spread of tumor. Intramural metastases may present microscopically as subepithelial spread, skip lesions, or satellite nodules, all of which may be found some distance away from the main tumor. The incidence of intramural metastasis and multiple tumors is up to 30% [31], and obtaining an adequate axial margin in esophagectomy is important to prevent anastomotic recurrence [32].
Early cancers have
En bloc esophagectomy
The concept of en bloc esophagectomy stems from the theory that malignant tumors should be resected with a complete covering of the surrounding normal tissues. The lower esophageal longitudinal muscle fibers arise and insert in part from the subpleural and pericardial fibrous layers, so these structures must be regarded as the serosa of the esophagus as opposed to the usual serosal layer that can be identified easily for the rest of the gastrointestinal tract. En bloc resection entails the
Three-field lymphadenectomy
Unfortunately the nomenclature of the nodal stations involved in esophageal lymphadenectomy is not uniform (Fig. 1). The American Joint Committee on Cancer [51] and the Guidelines for Clinical and Pathologic Studies on Carcinoma of the Esophagus advocated by the Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases [52] denote different numbers to the nodal stations. Nodal groups according to the description by Akiyama and colleagues [2] also differ. Another confusing issue is the classification of the
Summary
The optimal lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer remains controversial. En bloc resection and three-field lymphadenectomy have definite merits, but they are not suitable for all patients. Given their relatively high morbidity rates, appropriate patient selection is important and they should be performed in experienced centers. En bloc resection has been a concept developed in the West and applied mainly to tumors of the lower esophagus. The indication for three-field lymphadenectomy is being
References (87)
- et al.
Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis
Ann Thorac Surg
(2001) - et al.
A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma
Am J Surg
(1997) - et al.
Use of minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus
Lancet Oncol
(2002) - et al.
Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
Surgery
(1997) - et al.
Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization for pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy
Ann Thorac Surg
(2000) - et al.
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for stage I and II esophageal cancer
Ann Thorac Surg
(2005) - et al.
Hand-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery (HALTS) in radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2005) Minimally invasive surgical approaches to esophageal cancer
J Gastrointest Surg
(2002)- et al.
Treatment of superficial cancer of the esophagus: a summary of responses to a questionnaire on superficial cancer of the esophagus in Japan
Surgery
(1998) The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
(1963)
En-bloc esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
Am J Surg
Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients
J Am Coll Surg
The recurrence pattern of esophageal carcinoma after transhiatal resection
J Am Coll Surg
Recurrent nerve nodal involvement is associated with cervical nodal metastasis in thoracic esophageal carcinoma
J Am Coll Surg
Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Am J Surg
Real-time rapid reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for intraoperative diagnosis of lymph node micrometastasis: clinical application for cervical lymph node dissection in esophageal cancers
Surgery
Evaluation of neck lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal carcinoma
Ann Thorac Surg
A prospective randomized trial of extended cervical and superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus
Am J Surg
Current management of esophageal cancer
J Gastrointest Surg
Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements
Ann Surg
Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus
Ann Surg
Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States
Cancer
Transhiatal versus Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference?
Aust N Z J Surg
Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus
N Engl J Med
Oesophagectomy by a transhiatal approach or thoracotomy: a prospective randomized trial
Br J Surg
Surgical therapy of esophageal carcinoma: the influence of surgical approach and esophageal resection on cardiopulmonary function
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1,002 consecutive patients
Ann Surg
Occult esophageal adenocarcinoma: extent of disease and implications for effective therapy
Ann Surg
Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach
J R Coll Surg Edinb
Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for intrathoracic esophageal cancer
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
Hand-assisted endoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
Surg Today
Transhiatal approach for esophagectomy
Laparoscopically assisted transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus
Surg Endosc
Laparoscopic hand-assisted versus open transhiatal esophagectomy: a case-control study
Surg Endosc
Esophagectomy via laparoscopy and transmediastinal endodissection
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
Outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients
Ann Surg
Minimally invasive treatment of esophageal cancer: laparoscopic staging to robotic esophagectomy
Cancer J
Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer
Surg Endosc
Comparison of three-field esophagectomy for esophageal cancer incorporating open or thoracoscopic thoracotomy
Surg Endosc
A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation
Br J Surg
Measurement of extent of spread of oesophageal squamous carcinoma by serial sectioning
J Clin Pathol
Pattern of recurrence after oesophageal resection for cancer: clinical implications
Br J Surg
Cited by (34)
Determinants of Long-term Survival Decades After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
2023, Annals of Thoracic SurgeryRelevance of Subcarinal Lymph Node Dissection for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
2023, Journal of Surgical ResearchImpact of splenic node dissection on short-term outcome and survival following esophagectomy
2017, European Journal of Surgical OncologyCitation Excerpt :However, there is no unified standard for esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma internationally, and the most controversial point is the extent of lymph node dissection. Too extensive lymph node dissection could increase the surgical trauma and the incidence of complications.10–13 In recent years, some investigators proposed that lymph node dissection for some regions in specific patients can be omitted, such as subcarinal nodes and common hepatic nodes.14–17
Impact of subcarinal dissection on short-term outcome and survival following esophagectomy
2013, American Journal of SurgeryCitation Excerpt :There were “upward and downward metastasis” and “skip metastasis” in the node metastatic patterns of thoracic esophageal carcinoma,6,10,11 which drove surgeons to pursue a wide range of lymph node dissection. As proved by years of clinical practice, too extensive lymph node dissection increased surgical trauma and the incidence of complications, and 3-field lymph node dissection did not offer meaningful improvement in survival for all patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma.2–5 Rational extent of lymph node dissection can ensure surgical effect and postoperative quality of life and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.
Outcomes of cervical lymph node recurrence in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy with 2-field lymph node dissection
2013, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Several studies also suggested that extended lymphadenectomy containing a cervical lymph node dissection may prevent recurrent disease and improve the long-term outcomes.17,18 However, other authors have reported that extended nodal dissection did not contribute to reduced recurrence rates or to increased long-term survival outcomes.4,5,10,11,19-21 We found that the 2-, 5-, and 10-year rates of isolated cervical lymph node recurrence were 4.1%, 5.6%, and 7.3%, respectively, by using the Kaplan-Meier estimate in this study.
Predictors of cervical and recurrent laryngeal lymph node metastases from esophageal cancer
2010, Annals of Thoracic Surgery