Fructose intervention for 12 weeks does not impair glycemic control or incretin hormone responses during oral glucose or mixed meal tests in obese men
Introduction
An increase in the prevalence in obesity and diabetes closely parallels the dramatic rise in sugar, especially fructose, intake due to consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) that accounts for nearly one-half of all added sugar intake in the U.S. [1]. Nowadays, fructose is a major sweetener in Western diets [2]. In the U.S., 50% of population consumes SSBs daily, and 25% obtains at least 200 kcal from these beverages [1].
The relationship between SSB and cardiometabolic diseases seen in epidemiological studies reflects potential combined effects of fructose and glucose or unique effects of fructose alone. The current data suggest a causative relationship between the intake of sweeteners, particularly fructose, and the increased prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and dyslipidemia [1], [3], [4], especially postprandial plasma triglycerides (TG) [5].
Whether fructose consumption directly causes insulin resistance is much debated, and despite epidemiological evidence suggesting a link, data from intervention studies are inconsistent [4], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. However, most studies included relatively small numbers of participants, a short intervention period or used only fasting insulin as a marker for insulin sensitivity. A 3-week consumption of fructose in 9 normal-weight young males impaired insulin sensitivity, measured as suppression of hepatic glucose production during a clamp, but did not change fasting insulin or glucose levels [13]. Insulin sensitivity, assessed from fasting insulin levels and deuterated glucose disposal, decreased after a 10-week fructose consumption in overweight/obese humans [12]. Studies assessing the effect of hypercaloric fructose consumption with respect to both liver fat and insulin resistance have mostly reported no change in insulin sensitivity, with varying effects on liver fat [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. One study with 6–7 days intervention reported worsened insulin resistance together with increased liver fat [11].
Gut incretins, mainly glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), mediate the insulinotropic response to intraluminal nutrients [14]. Defects in either secretion or insulinotropic actions of GLP-1 and GIP are early signs of acquired insulin resistance characterizing the metabolic syndrome [5], [16]. Data on whether a single dose of fructose stimulates GLP-1 secretion in humans are inconsistent [17], [18], [19], whereas GIP secretion remains unaffected [17], [18], [19]. However, no data exists on the effect of longer fructose intervention on GLP-1 and GIP responses to nutritional stimuli.
Here, we test the hypothesis whether worsening of glycemic control induced by fructose consumption (75 g/day for 12 weeks served as a lemonade together with habitual ad libitum diet) may involve a gut incretin-dependent mechanism. Therefore, we studied the responses of GLP-1 and GIP in the fasting state and following a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and the more physiological mixed meal test before and after fructose intervention in overweight male subjects who have high risk for future diabetes.
Section snippets
Study cohort
We recruited 82 obese healthy men to the Fructose intervention study (Clinical Trials NCT01445730) at four centers including in Quebec, Canada; Helsinki, Finland; Naples, Italy; and Gothenburg, Sweden. Two subjects discontinued the intervention study: one due to skin rash which was considered as possible allergic reaction to flavoring. The rash disappeared after the discontinuation. The other subject discontinued the study in response to his dentist's advice. In addition, the data from magnetic
Baseline characteristics
The study subjects were on average 48 years old and had a BMI of 30.6 kg/m2. Their characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Before the OGTT or mixed meal, fasting concentrations of glucose, insulin, GLP-1 and GIP were essentially similar. There were no correlations between fasting concentrations of GLP-1 or GIP with BMI, liver fat, subcutaneous or visceral fat nor with concentrations of fasting glucose or insulin. Only fasting GLP-1 correlated with HOMA-IR (r = 0.245, p = 0.049).
Fructose intervention does not modify indexes of insulin sensitivity or secretion or responses of glucose, insulin or incretins during OGTT
During the
Discussion
This is the first study to report the effect of fructose consumption in obese non-diabetic males on incretin responses following both OGTT and mixed meal. We show that despite mild but significant weight and liver fat gain accompanied with fasting and postprandial TG increase, fructose consumption had no impact on either glycemic control or GLP-1 and GIP responses. Furthermore, although subgroups who gained either weight or liver fat had worse TG profiles, this was not associated with worsening
Sources of funding
This paper was supported by grants from Helsinki University Central Hospital EVO-funds, Academy of Finland (grants 266286 and 272376), European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, Juho Vainio Foundation, Foundation Leducq France, Swedish Research Council, Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, Diabetes Research Wellness Foundation, Sahlgrenska University Hospital ALF grant, Swedish Diabetes Foundation, the NovoNordisk Foundation, and the EU
Disclosures
M.R.T. from Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Kowa, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and AstraZeneca; J.B. from AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Aventis and Merck Sharp & Dome; C.F.D. from Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, MSD and Novo Nordisk; K.H.P. from Merck/MSD, Novo Nordisk, and AstraZeneca; and B.E. from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, MSD and Boehringer Ingelheim.
Conflict of interest
None.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Hannele Hilden, Helinä Perttunen-Nio, Elisa Koivisto, Sylvain Pouliot, Elin Stenfeldt, Eva Hedman-Sabler and Sofie Pilgaard for excellent laboratory work and patient care.
References (32)
- et al.
Fructose and cardiometabolic health: what the evidence from sugar-sweetened beverages tells us
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2015) How bad is fructose?
Am J Clin Nutr
(2007)- et al.
Fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or indexes of liver health: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Am J Clin Nutr
(2014) - et al.
A dose-response study of consuming high-fructose corn syrup-sweetened beverages on lipid/lipoprotein risk factors for cardiovascular disease in young adults
Am J Clin Nutr
(2015) - et al.
Sucrose-sweetened beverages increase fat storage in the liver, muscle, and visceral fat depot: a 6-mo randomized intervention study
Am J Clin Nutr
(2012) - et al.
Glycemic, hormone, and appetite responses to monosaccharide ingestion in patients with type 2 diabetes
Metabolism
(2002) - et al.
Immunoassays for the incretin hormones GIP and GLP-1
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab
(2009) - et al.
Association of fructose consumption and components of metabolic syndrome in human studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nutrition
(2014) - et al.
Effect of fructose consumption on insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diet-intervention trials
Am J Clin Nutr
(2016) - et al.
Glycemic index, glycemic load and glycemic response: an International Scientific Consensus Summit from the International Carbohydrate Quality Consortium (ICQC)
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
(2015)
Clinical research strategies for fructose metabolism
Adv Nutr
Imbalanced insulin action in chronic over nutrition: clinical harm, molecular mechanisms, and a way forward
Atherosclerosis
Fructose vs. glucose and metabolism: do the metabolic differences matter?
Curr Opin Lipidol
No difference between high-fructose and high-glucose diets on liver triacylglycerol or biochemistry in healthy overweight men
Gastroenterology
Effects of a short-term overfeeding with fructose or glucose in healthy young males
Br J Nutr
Effects of 4-week very-high-fructose/glucose diets on insulin sensitivity, visceral fat and intrahepatic lipids: an exploratory trial
Br J Nutr
Cited by (16)
GLP-1 attenuates intestinal fat absorption and chylomicron production via vagal afferent nerves originating in the portal vein
2022, Molecular MetabolismCitation Excerpt :Indeed, in our hamster model, two weeks of feeding a fructose-enriched diet was sufficient to render animals insensitive to portal vein injection of GLP-1. This is consistent with clinical studies where men who consumed a fructose enriched diet for 12 weeks had elevated plasma TG for 2 h after a mixed meal, but no increase in GLP-1 levels [36]. In obese prone rats fed a high fat diet, the ability of exendin-4 to reduce food intake is diminished, which was associated with decreased expression of GLP-1R mRNA in the nodose ganglia [37].
Carbohydrates: Separating fact from fiction
2021, AtherosclerosisCitation Excerpt :In this respect, it is important to underline that in a recent trial in obese males with features of the metabolic syndrome, 12-week supplementation with a drink containing 75 g fructose/day did not change glucose and insulin during an OGTT. However, fructose intake, paralleled by a mild weight gain, increased liver fat, and worsened postprandial triglycerides [72]. In summary, excessive fructose ingestion (>10% of diet) can worsen the cardiometabolic profile due to increased hepatic de novo lipogenesis, accumulation of visceral adiposity and ectopic fat in the liver (Fig. 4).
High fructose intake and the route towards cardiometabolic diseases
2020, Life SciencesLiquid fructose and liver insulin signaling: Molecular mechanisms controlling hepatic steatosis
2019, Molecular Nutrition Carbohydrates