Luminosity determination at HERA-B

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.09.011Get rights and content

Abstract

A detailed description of an original method used to measure the luminosity accumulated by the HERA-B experiment for a data sample taken during the 2002–2003 HERA running period is reported. We show that, with this method, a total luminosity measurement can be achieved with a typical precision, including overall systematic uncertainties, at a level of 5% or better. We also report evidence for the detection of δ-rays generated in the target and comment on the possible use of such delta rays to measure luminosity.

Introduction

A precise determination of the luminosity is required for the measurement of absolute cross-sections. The integrated luminosity (L) is defined byL=NPσPwhere NP is the number of events of a given process and σP is the corresponding cross-section. In the case of HERA-B, which is a forward spectrometer [1], [2] experiment, operated at the 920 GeV proton beam of the HERA accelerator at the DESY Laboratory in Hamburg, the proton beam is bunched and interacts with a nuclear target placed on the halo of the beam. The number of proton–nucleus (pA) interactions per bunch crossing is subject to statistical fluctuations. For HERA-B, as for all other experiments having a bunched beam, the luminosity can be expressed asL=NBX·λσwhere λ is the average number of interactions per bunch crossing BX, NBX is the number of beam bunches crossing the apparatus and σ is the interaction cross-section (for a more detailed discussion, see 4 The cross-sections, 5 General remarks on the luminosity determination). As a consequence, given the cross-section of proton–nucleus interactions, the luminosity can be measured by determining λ and NBX. The average number of interactions per BX can be obtained from a fully unbiased sample of events in various ways: by looking at inclusive quantities which are proportional to the number of interactions in one event (such as the number of tracks or the energy released in a calorimeter), by counting the number of primary vertices or by counting the number of empty events. The first method has the advantage of entailing only a rather straightforward analysis of the data, but the signal corresponding to a single interaction must be evaluated precisely and detector stability becomes a relatively critical issue. In the second method, the vertex reconstruction efficiencies must be known precisely as well as the probability of erroneously merging or splitting primary vertices during reconstruction. In the third method, the distribution of the number of interactions per bunch crossing must be either known or assumed and the efficiency for detecting non-empty events and the impact of noise events must be evaluated.

After careful studies the HERA-B Collaboration has decided to exploit the method based on counting events with evidence of at least one interaction (which is equivalent to the third method listed above), since this method minimizes the systematic error on the luminosity determination allowing to achieve a final precision of about 5%.

The paper is organized in the following way. In 2 The HERA accelerator and the target, 3 The HERA-B detector and the data sample the main features of the HERA accelerator relevant for this analysis and the HERA-B detector are briefly described. Section 4 summarizes all of the published proton–nucleus cross-section measurements which are used for the luminosity determination. In 5 General remarks on the luminosity determination, 6 The determination of, the relevant relations for the determination of the luminosity are described. In Section 7 we discuss the systematic uncertainties and comment on delta ray production, while in Section 8 we report the results obtained for the interaction trigger (defined below) data sample.

Section snippets

The HERA accelerator and the target

HERA is a double storage ring designed for colliding a 920 GeV proton beam with a 27.5 GeV electron beam. Four interaction regions exist: two of them house the general purpose ep detectors H1 and ZEUS, while the other two accommodate the fixed target experiments HERA-B and HERMES. In the following we describe the beam parameters and the filling scheme used during the HERA-B data taking period 2002–2003.

The typical proton current is 80 mA, distributed over 180 bunches with a typical bunch length

The HERA-B detector and the data sample

The HERA-B experiment is a forward magnetic spectrometer with an acceptance extending from 15 to 220 mrad horizontally and to 160 mrad vertically. This large angular coverage allows studies in kinematic regions not accessible to previous fixed-target high energy experiments. A top view of the detector is shown in Fig. 2.

The first part of the spectrometer is devoted to tracking and vertex measurements and consists of the target, a silicon vertex detector, a magnet and a tracking system. The second

The cross-sections

The total pA cross-section σtot can be divided into elastic (σel) and inelastic (σinel) contributions:σtot=σel+σinel=σel+σmb+σtsd+σbsd+σdd.In this context, the cross-section σel is regarded as the sum of the elastic (pApA) and quasielastic contribution (pApA*). The inelastic cross-section includes a minimum bias part (mb) and a diffractive part which can be further subdivided into target single diffractive (tsd, pApY), beam single diffractive (bsd, pAXA) and double diffractive (dd, pAXY)

General remarks on the luminosity determination

In the following, the luminosity given by Eq. (2) will be expressed in terms of the total number of events satisfying the IA trigger (NIA), the average number of interactions per bunch crossing (λtot), the trigger efficiency per single interaction (εtot) and the total hadronic cross-section (σtot). In order to do this, two assumptions are made:

  • the number of interactions per filled bunch can be described by a single Poisson distribution P(n,λtot), for all bunch crossings in a given data run:P(n,λ

The determination of λmb

The determination of λmb relies on the pseudo random trigger data sample acquired in parallel to the IA trigger and the large-acceptance detectors which constitute the spectrometer. Specifically, λmb is obtained by combining the information from a variety of subdetectors to also provide a cross-check of the stability of the result and the systematic uncertainties due to the detector response and the event model of the Monte Carlo. Only the filled bunches of HERA were considered.

The average

General considerations

According to Eq. (11) and the assumption on which Eq. (6) is based, the following systematic uncertainties must be taken into account:

  • the uncertainty on KA, arising from the Monte Carlo (MC) event model and the poorly known observation probability of diffractive processes;

  • the uncertainty on the determination of λmb;

  • the uncertainty associated with deviations of the interaction probability distribution from the assumed Poisson distribution (e.g. due to the uneven filling of bunches);

  • the

Summary and conclusions

As previously noted the uncertainties affecting the total luminosity measurement are dominated by the systematic contribution, since each IA trigger run contains enough random trigger events to make the contribution from statistics negligible. In Table 6 we summarize the overall relative uncertainty on the total luminosity calculation ((δLtot)/Ltot). In the second column the uncertainty on KA is given. This contribution depends on the present knowledge of the cross-sections (see Table 1) and

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the DESY laboratory and to the DESY accelerator group for their strong support since the conception of the HERA-B experiment. The HERA-B experiment would not have been possible without the enormous effort and commitment of our technical and administrative staff.

References (24)

  • K. Ehret

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2000)
  • K. Ehret

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2001)
  • C. Bauer

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2003)
  • T. Zeuner

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2000)
    Y. Bagaturia

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2002)
  • H. Albrecht

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2005)
    H. Albrecht

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2005)
  • I. Ariño

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2004)
  • A. Zoccoli

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2000)
    G. Avoni

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2001)
  • V. Eiges

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2001)
  • V. Balagura

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2002)
    T. Nunez

    Nucl. Phys. B Proc. (Suppl.)

    (2003)
    M. Dam

    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A

    (2004)
  • J. Carvalho

    Nuclear Physics A

    (2003)
  • P.V.R. Murthy

    Nucl. Phys. B

    (1975)
  • A.S. Carroll

    Phys. Lett. B

    (1979)
  • 1

    Supported by the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM), 3502 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    2

    Supported by the CICYT Contract AEN99-0483.

    3

    Supported by the German Research Foundation, Graduate College GRK 271/3.

    4

    Supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, FRG, under contract numbers 05-7BU35I, 05-7DO55P, 05-HB1HRA, 05-HB1KHA, 05-HB1PEA, 05-HB1PSA, 05-HB1VHA, 05-HB9HRA, 05-7HD15I, 05-7MP25I, 05-7SI75I.

    5

    Also from Fondazione Giuseppe Occhialini, I-61034 Fossombrone(Pesaro Urbino), Italy.

    6

    Supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).

    7

    Supported by the Portuguese Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia under the program POCTI.

    8

    Supported by the Danish Natural Science Research Council.

    9

    Supported by the National Academy of Science and the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine.

    10

    Supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Sport of the Republic of Slovenia under contracts number P1-135 and J1-6584-0106.

    11

    Supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation Grant PHY-9986703.

    12

    Supported by the Russian Ministry of Education and Science, Grant SS-1722.2003.2, and the BMBF via the Max Planck Research Award.

    13

    Supported by the Norwegian Research Council.

    14

    Supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation.

    15

    Visitor from Dipartimento di Energetica dell’ Università di Firenze and INFN Sezione di Bologna, Italy.

    16

    Visitor from P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, 117924 Moscow B-333, Russia.

    17

    Visitor from Moscow Physical Engineering Institute, 115409 Moscow, Russia.

    18

    Visitor from Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia.

    19

    Visitor from Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Russia.

    20

    Visitor from High Energy Physics Institute, 380086 Tbilisi, Georgia.

    Deceased.

    View full text