Original ArticleFunctional and Psychosocial Outcomes 1 year after Mild Stroke
Section snippets
Study Design
A prospective cohort study was undertaken to examine and describe changes in patient functional status, patient and wife-caregiver QOL and depression, wife-caregiver strain, and marital dyad functioning during the 12 months after hospital discharge. As the changes in the early discharge period poststroke can be rapid, the measures were repeated monthly for the first 3 months, then at 6, 9, and 12 months postdischarge.
Sample
After obtaining approval from our health research ethics board, study
Results
In all, 48 couples (men with stroke and their wife-caregivers) provided informed consent and were initially enrolled in the study. Those who had missing values on more than 20% of the questionnaires were excluded (2 patients sustained a second stroke and 8 couples declined to participate further or could not be located for follow-up). Thus, the final sample was 38 couples (76 individuals). Data were missing on demographic characteristics and follow-up functional and psychosocial scores for 9 of
Discussion
We examined the impact of mild stroke on functional outcomes, QOL, depression, caregiver burden, and marital function in a cohort of men with mild stroke and their wife-caregivers. Consistent with current literature, the men with mild stroke demonstrated significant improvement in their functional recovery during the follow-up period.5, 6, 7 Much of functional recovery after stroke occurs in the first few months poststroke although full recovery is often tempered by other elements of physical
Conclusions
This study offers new insights into the recovery trajectory of mild stroke for patients and their wife-caregivers. Although the term “mild” implies the consequences of a stroke are negligible, this was not the case in this study and the importance of identifying biopsychosocial characteristics that may impede full recovery and affect the marital relationship should not be underestimated. Our findings imply that psychosocial outcomes are not necessarily related to physical sequelae of mild
References (33)
- et al.
Change in stroke incidence, mortality, case-fatality, severity, and risk factors in Oxfordshire, UK from 1981 to 2004 (Oxford vascular study)
Lancet
(2004) - et al.
The impact of mild stroke on meaningful activity and life satisfaction
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
(2006) - et al.
Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2002) - et al.
“Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician
J Psychiatr Res
(1975) - et al.
Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2003) - et al.
Poststroke fatigue: Course and its relation to personal and stroke-related factors
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(2006) - et al.
Atlas of heart disease and stroke
(2004) - et al.
A comparison of risk factors and prognosis for transient ischemic attacks and minor ischemic strokes: The Oxfordshire community stroke project
Stroke
(1989) - et al.
A qualitative study of the consequences of 'hidden dysfunctions' one year after a mild stroke in persons < 75 years
Disabil Rehabil
(2004) - et al.
Health status of individuals with mild stroke
Stroke
(1997)
Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale
Stroke
Functional evaluation: The Barthel index
Md State Med J
Cerebrovascular accidents in patients over the age of 60, II: Prognosis
Scott Med J
Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function
Neurology
Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale
Stroke
How to score version 2 of the SF-12 Health Survey® (with a supplement documenting version 1)
Quality Metric Inc. and Health Assessment Lab. Lincoln (RI)
Cited by (63)
Prevalence and Predictors of Fatigue and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Patients with Minor Ischemic Stroke
2021, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular DiseasesCitation Excerpt :Stroke is classified as "minor" when the patient develops few acute neurological symptoms or when there is good functional performance despite the sequelae.6 Patients with minor stroke are expected to return to their pre-stroke functional status relatively quickly, and therefore are unlikely to be strictly followed up by a neurologist.7 Actually, despite the classification, the nomenclature "minor stroke" deserves caution and may underestimate the importance and risks that are naturally linked to this condition.
Cognition and Quality of Life in Symptomatic Carotid Occlusion
2019, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular DiseasesCitation Excerpt :The SSQOL consists of questions in the following subgroup domains with ratings ranging from 1 (most impairment) to 5 (no impairment): energy; family roles; language function; mobility; vision; mood; work; personality; self-care; social roles; thinking; and arm function. SSQOL subgroup domains may be examined separately or, as in the current study, the domain scores may be averaged to produce 1 SSQOL score per patient.23 The NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was used to assess deficits from remote stroke.24
Interdisciplinary Approaches to Facilitate Return to Driving and Return to Work in Mild Stroke: A Position Paper
2018, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationDevelopment of a Social Functioning Assessment Using Computerized Adaptive Testing for Patients With Stroke
2018, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationMarriage after the transition to stroke: A systematic review
2018, Ageing and SocietyMachine Learning Technique Reveals Intrinsic EEG Connectivity Characteristics of Patients With Mild Stroke During Cognitive Task Performing
2024, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems
Dr. Green was supported by a Strategic Training in Health Research Fellowship from the FUTURE Program for Cardiovascular Nurse Scientists, funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Canadian Stroke Network; and a PhD Scholarship from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. The research was supported by the Calgary Stroke Program and the Canadian Association of Neuroscience Nurses. Dr. King is supported by a Health Scholar Award from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.