Elsevier

Journal of Pediatric Urology

Volume 11, Issue 6, December 2015, Pages 337.e1-337.e6
Journal of Pediatric Urology

Prospective study on the incidence of bladder/cloacal exstrophy and epispadias in Europe

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.03.023Get rights and content

Summary

Objective

On behalf of the European Society of Paediatric Urology (ESPU), a prospective study was designed with the aim of defining the actual number of babies born with bladder exstrophy, cloacal exstrophy, and epispadias in Europe over a 12-month period, and verifying the distribution of the exstrophy patients born during the study period among the different paediatric urology centres in Europe.

Study design

The study was structured with a chief investigator and one national investigator for each country enrolled in the study. The national investigators nominated one local investigator for each European centre of paediatric surgery/paediatric urology and urology where the exstrophy complex could potentially be treated. The local investigators were responsible for reporting babies treated in their institutions for bladder/cloacal exstrophy and/or epispadias. During 2010, every 3 months, an electronic survey (Figure) was e-mailed to the local investigators asking them to report babies treated or referred for treatment during the previous 3 months.

Results

One-hundred and sixteen centres in 27 European counties were enrolled in the study. The overall response rate for the four online surveys was 79%. Two-hundred and thirty-eight babies were reported to be born with a condition within the bladder exstrophy epispadias complex (BEEC): 71 primary epispadias (66 males), 146 classic bladder exstrophy (97 males) of which two were female bladder exstrophy variant, and 21 cloacal exstrophy (17 males). Two of 67 (3%) male epispadias, 24/146 (16.4%) bladder exstrophy, and 6/21 (28%) cloacal exstrophy were antenatally diagnosed. Associated anomalies were reported in 2/71 (2.8%) epispadias patients, 8/146 (5.5%) bladder exstrophy patients, and 15/21 (71.4%) cloacal exstrophy patients. One-hundred and forty-seven (62%) of the 238 babies born in Europe with a condition within the exstrophy spectrum during 2010 were transferred from other institutions for treatment (36 male epispadias, 97 bladder exstrophy, and 14 cloacal exstrophy). Only 12 centres treated six or more exstrophy and or epispadias patients during the study period; 52 treated between one and five patients, of which 22 treated only one case in 12 months.

Discussion

This study provides a contemporary incidence of the BEEC in Europe. It demonstrates also that only a minority (19%) of the European centres involved in the treatment of exstrophy can be considered “high volume” exstrophy centres.

Conclusion

There is a case for proposing a rationalisation of the treatment of this group of conditions in a small number of exstrophy units around Europe.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (263KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Figure. Sample of the online questionnaire emailed to the local investigators.

Introduction

According to Eurostat, 5 421 000 live births were registered in the EU27 in 2008 [1]. Considering the published incidence of the bladder exstrophy complex (male epispadias 1:117 000 [2]; female epispadias 1:484 000 [2]; classic bladder exstrophy 1:37 000 [3]; cloacal exstrophy 1:200 000 [4]) in the EU27 every year, about 146 classic bladder exstrophy, 46 male epispadias, 27 cloacal exstrophy, and 11 female epispadias patients would have been expected to be born. Routine antenatal screening ultrasound is commonly used in most European countries. The EUROSCAN study [3] was conducted in 12 European countries between 1996 and 1998 monitoring over 709 000 births. Fifty-two per cent of the bladder exstrophy cases were antenatally detected. The study showed that 80% of the antenatally detected cases of bladder exstrophy were terminated, the incidence of bladder exstrophy in Europe was 1:37 000 foetuses, but only one baby every 71 000 was actually born. What is the incidence of the exstrophy complex in Europe at the moment? Also, what is the average exposure of European paediatric urologists to exstrophy? Is there a need for promoting centralisation of treatment of exstrophy throughout Europe, as has already been adopted in the UK and the Netherlands?

To address these questions, the authors have organised, on behalf of the European Society of Paediatric Urology (ESPU), a prospective study, the aim of which was to define the actual number of babies born with bladder exstrophy, cloacal exstrophy, and epispadias in Europe over a 12-month period and to verify the distribution of the exstrophy patients born during the study period among the different paediatric urology centres in Europe. The study did not investigate the rate of termination of pregnancy when antenatal diagnosis was made.

Section snippets

Methods

The study was announced at the European Society of Paediatric Urology (ESPU) annual meeting in 2007 [5].

It was structured with a chief investigator (RMC), one national investigator for each country enrolled in the study, and a local investigator for each centre enrolled in the study.

The national investigators were selected using primarily the ESPU members' database. For countries where more than one ESPU member was available, the national investigator was chosen based on perceived academic

Results

Twenty-nine countries were invited to take part in the study. No national investigators accepted this role for Ireland and Norway; therefore these two countries were excluded from the study. Twenty-seven national investigators were enrolled in the study in 27 countries in Europe and surrounding areas; the list of the national investigators can be found at http://www.espu.org/be_study/index.php?id=44. One-hundred and seventy local investigators were identified and 116 agreed to take part in the

Discussion

This study confirms the data from Goyal et al. [10] who found an antenatal diagnosis rate of 25% in the BE and CE conditions. Termination of pregnancy is still often advised when BE is detected antenatally [3]; however, because exstrophy can be detected antenatally in only a minority of the cases, the incidence of BE in Europe is similar to the data previously published [2].

Rickham reported an incidence of bladder exstrophy in the Liverpool region (UK) of 1/40 000 between 1942 and 1953, and

Conclusion

This first prospective epidemiological study focused on the bladder exstrophy complex in Europe provides a contemporary incidence of the BEEC. The study demonstrated also that only a minority of the European Paediatric Urology Centres can be considered “high volume” exstrophy units. Considering the need for an experienced multidisciplinary team for the optimal treatment of exstrophy, there is a strong case for proposing a rationalisation of the treatment of this group of conditions in a small

Conflict of interest

None.

Funding

None.

Acknowledgments

The Authors would like to express their gratitude to Mr Clément Ekstein, ESPU webmaster, for his IT support before, during, and after the study period; Mr Manfred te Grotenhuis, Department of Sociology, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands, for the statistical advise; Prof Sedar Tekgül for supporting the study; all the National and Local investigators for their precious contribution.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • Narrowing the chromosome 22q11.2 locus duplicated in bladder exstrophy–epispadias complex

    2022, Journal of Pediatric Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    In a Europe-wide prospective survey, 238 affected individuals with BEEC were reported to be born in a single year [11]. Here, CBE was the most common form, with an estimated birth incidence of 1/46,000 [11]. Given that certain other urinary tract malformations can have defined genetic bases, as outlined above, we, and others, have considered that BEEC could have one or more genetic causes.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text