Anesthesia/facial pain
Postdischarge Nausea and Vomiting Remains Frequent After Le Fort I Osteotomy Despite Implementation of a Multimodal Antiemetic Protocol Effective in Reducing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.015Get rights and content

Purpose

To assess the prevalence of postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) after Le Fort I osteotomy with and without the use of a multimodal antiemetic protocol shown to decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

Materials and Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy with or without additional procedures at a single academic institution formed the intervention cohort for an institutional review board–approved prospective clinical trial with a retrospective comparison group. The intervention cohort was managed with a multimodal antiemetic protocol. The comparison group consisted of consecutive patients who underwent similar surgical procedures at the same institution before protocol implementation. All patients were asked to complete a postdischarge diary documenting the occurrence of nausea and vomiting. Those who completed the diaries were included in this analysis. Data were analyzed with the Fisher exact test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. A P value less than .05 was considered significant.

Results

Diaries were completed by 85% of patients in the intervention group (79 of 93) and 75% of patients in the comparison group (103 of 137). Patients in the intervention (n = 79) and comparison (n = 103) groups were similar in the proportion of patients with validated risk factors for PDNV, including female gender, history of PONV, age younger than 50 years, opioid use in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and nausea in the PACU (P = .37). The prevalence of PDNV was unaffected by the antiemetic protocol. After discharge, nausea was reported by 72% of patients in the intervention group and 60% of patients in the comparison group (P = .13) and vomiting was reported by 22% of patients in the intervention group and 29% of patients in the comparison group (P = .40).

Conclusion

Modalities that successfully address PONV after Le Fort I osteotomy might fail to affect PDNV, which is prevalent in this population. Future investigation will focus on methods to minimize PDNV.

Section snippets

Materials and Methods

A prospective, institutional review board–approved clinical trial (919.966.3113, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) with a retrospective comparison group was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT01592708) This study showed a statistical decrease in postoperative nausea (PON) and postoperative vomiting (POV) experienced by patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy, with or without additional procedures, after the introduction of a multimodal antiemetic protocol. PDNV was studied in the

Results

Diaries were completed by 85% of patients in the intervention group (n = 79) and 75% of patients in the comparison group (n = 103). The total intervention (n = 93) and comparison (n = 137) groups were similar in gender (P = .29), race (P = .85), age (P = .75), proportion of patients with known risk factors for PONV (including female gender, nonsmoking status, history of PONV or motion sickness, and history of migraine headaches; P = .34), percentage undergoing bimaxillary surgery (60% in each

Discussion

The authors hypothesized that the prevalence of PDNV would be high after Le Fort I surgery and that the prevalence would be decreased by the antiemetic protocol. The prevalence of PDNV was indeed very high in this patient population. However, although this multimodal antiemetic protocol statistically decreased PON and POV,1 it had no statistical impact on PDNV. There was a trend toward slightly more PDN that lasted slightly longer in the intervention group, but a trend toward more PDV in the

References (53)

  • C. Dicus Brookes et al.

    Multimodal protocol reduces post-operative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2015)
  • T.J. Gan et al.

    Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Anesth Analg

    (2007)
  • T.J. Gan et al.

    Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Anesth Analg

    (2014)
  • V. Chinnappa et al.

    Post-discharge nausea and vomiting: An overlooked aspect of ambulatory anesthesia?

    Can J Anaesth

    (2008)
  • C.L. Wu et al.

    Systematic review and analysis of postdischarge symptoms after outpatient surgery

    Anesthesiology

    (2002)
  • A. Gupta et al.

    Does the routine prophylactic use of antiemetics affect the incidence of postdischarge nausea and vomiting following ambulatory surgery?

    Anesthesiology

    (2003)
  • N.V. Carroll et al.

    Postoperative nausea and vomiting after discharge from outpatient surgery centers

    Anesth Analg

    (1995)
  • B.S. Gold et al.

    Unanticipated admission to the hospital following ambulatory surgery

    JAMA

    (1989)
  • B.K. Philip

    Patients’ assessment of ambulatory anesthesia and surgery

    J Clin Anesth

    (1992)
  • M. Lehmann et al.

    Postoperative patient complaints: A prospective interview study of 12,276 patients

    J Clin Anesth

    (2010)
  • P.S. Myles et al.

    Patient satisfaction after anaesthesia and surgery: Results of a prospective survey of 10,811 patients

    Br J Anaesth

    (2000)
  • A. Macario et al.

    Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients

    Anesth Analg

    (1999)
  • C.C. Apfel et al.

    Who is at risk for postdischarge nausea and vomiting after ambulatory surgery?

    Anesthesiology

    (2012)
  • A.C. Silva et al.

    Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study and literature review

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2006)
  • C. Phillips et al.

    Post-operative nausea and vomiting following orthognathic surgery

    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (2015)
  • P. Kranke et al.

    The efficacy and safety of transdermal scopolamine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: A quantitative systematic review

    Anesth Analg

    (2002)
  • V.J. Kopp et al.

    Intravenous erythromycin promotes gastric emptying prior to emergency anesthesia

    Anesthesiology

    (1997)
  • Z. Itoh et al.

    Erythromycin mimics exogenous motilin in gastrointestinal contractile activity in the dog

    Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol

    (1984)
  • A.N. Barkun et al.

    International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

    Ann Int Med

    (2010)
  • A.N. Barkun et al.

    Prokinetics in acute upper GI bleeding: A meta-analysis

    Gastrointest Endosc

    (2010)
  • C.C. Apfel et al.

    A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • M. Tramer et al.

    Propofol anaesthesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting: Quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled studies

    Br J Anesth

    (1997)
  • M.R. Tramer et al.

    Omitting antagonism of neuromuscular blockade: Effect on postoperative nausea and vomiting and risk of residual paralysis. A systematic review

    Br J Anaesth

    (1999)
  • A.S. Habib et al.

    The effectiveness of rescue antiemetics after failure of prophylaxis with ondansetron or droperidol: A preliminary report

    J Clin Anesth

    (2005)
  • P.E. Scuderi et al.

    Multimodal antiemetic management prevents early postoperative vomiting after outpatient laparoscopy

    Anesth Analg

    (2000)
  • D.S. Precious et al.

    A comparison of patient-controlled and fixed schedule analgesia after orthognathic surgery

    J Oral Maxillofac Surg

    (1997)
  • Cited by (7)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was funded by National Institutes of Health grant R01 DE 005215.

    Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None of the authors reported any disclosures.

    View full text