Journal of Molecular Biology
Distinct DNA Elements Contribute to Rap1p Affinity for its Binding Sites
Introduction
The majority of ribosomal protein (RP) genes and a number of the translation factors genes contain binding sites for the essential Rap1 protein in their upstream regions.1., 2. Rap1p binding at these and many other promoter sites in vivo was recently demonstrated by global (genome-wide) chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses.3., 4. The set of genes whose upstream sequences bind Rap1p is heavily skewed towards highly expressed, growth-related genes, and, in the few cases examined in detail, deletion analyses indicate that the Rap1p binding sites are required for full activation.5 Nevertheless, direct proof for an activation role of Rap1p at specific genes has been difficult to obtain.6 Recent global transcription analyses have revealed a remarkably robust coordinate regulation of RP gene transcription in response to a wide range of nutrient or stress conditions,7., 8., 9. emphasizing the importance to the yeast cell of controlling RP gene transcription, and ultimately ribosome production, with perceived growth potential.10 Interestingly, the down-regulation of RP gene transcription in response to one such stress condition, a block to secretion,11 has been directly linked to Rap112 and this protein is also important for this response at RP gene promoters devoid of its binding sites.12 Moreover, in recent papers, a role of Rap1p in the transcriptional repression of Pol I genes due to secretory defects has been shown.13., 14. An understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying Rap1p action at promoters, both direct and indirect, will thus have important implications for growth regulation in general.
The mechanism(s) by which Rap1p contributes to transcriptional activation at RP genes are still unclear, although several models have been proposed.15., 16., 17., 18., 19. Rap1p exerts a strong effect on the chromatin structure of the promoters to which it binds, and has been proposed to act, at least in some cases, as a chromatin “opener”.20., 21. At promoters for some glycolytic enzymes genes Rap1p appears to promote activation by a direct interaction with the co-activator Gcr1p, which requires Rap1p to bind in the context of chromatin.19., 22. It should also be pointed out that in different chromatin contexts, namely at telomeres and silent mating-type loci, Rap1p binding contributes directly to the formation of Sir-dependent heterochromatin.2., 23.
Rap1 is a large protein (827 aa) that contains two distinct but structurally similar Myb-like DNA-binding domains (DBD).24 These two DBD interact with two (often imperfect) direct repeats present in known Rap1 DNA-binding sites,24., 25. which display considerable sequence variability. Detailed analysis of three different Rap1-DNA co-crystal structures indicates that Rap1 recognizes different sequences through subtle re-positioning of side-chains at the protein–DNA interface rather than global movements of the two DNA-binding sub-domains.25 Two similar consensus Rap1 binding-site sequences have recently been published: ACAYCCRTACATY26 and ACACCCRYACAYM.3 The latter was shown to be predictive for Rap1p binding within promoter regions.3 However, Rap1p binding to promoters devoid of canonical binding sites has also been observed in vivo.3., 4. Both consensus sequences are characterized by the two tandem hemisites ACACC or ACAYC and ACATY or ACAYM, connected by a trinucleotide linker sequence (CRT or CRY). Previous analyses using gel electrophoresis or scanning tunneling microscopy suggest that Rap1p causes a large DNA bend (90–110° according to gel estimates), whose vertex is located 5′ of its consensus DNA-binding site.27., 28., 29. Interestingly, this bending is neither observed in the crystal structures of protein–DNA complexes with the isolated DBD,24., 25. nor in solution studies of the DBD alone, but appears instead to require sequences amino-terminal to the DBD.29
Rap1p binding induces the formation of KMnO4 hypersensitive sites so specific as to be potentially diagnostic for the binding itself.27 We have adapted this method to the in vivo analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells and have used it to determine the promoter occupancy by Rap1p during transcription regulation.21 Our data showed that three copies of Rap1p are simultaneously bound to the TEF2 promoter in exponentially growing cells, and that aminoacid starvation does not cause loss of Rap1p from the complex with DNA. However, in vivo UV-footprinting reveals the occurrence of structural modifications of the complex. Moreover, low-resolution micrococcal nuclease digestion shows that the chromatin of the entire region is devoid of positioned nucleosomes but is susceptible to changes in accessibility to the nuclease upon aminoacid starvation. Thus, the modification of the function of the Rap1p-controlled promoters studied reveals a defined set of in vivo modifications caused not by loss of protein occupancy but, possibly, by structural modifications of its complex with DNA, as postulated by Pina.5 In order to better understand the mechanism of action of this widespread and relevant protein, whose regulatory roles often appear to be contradictory, we have performed a detailed analysis of the DNA elements involved in its function. The results provide an explanation of the biological role paradoxically exerted by Rap1p at several promoters devoid of canonical binding sites.
Section snippets
Mapping the Rap1p-binding domain by primer extension
In order to understand if DNA sequences outside the consensus binding site contribute to the overall binding affinity, we used a method established by Crothers and colleagues for analysis of CAP DNA-binding interactions.30., 31. The procedure consists of several steps, the first of which is the generation, by primer extension in the presence of chain-terminating dideoxynucleoside triphosphates, of a set of double-stranded DNA molecules containing putative Rap1p binding sites (or partial sites),
The thermodynamically defined DNA-binding domain of Rap1p
By mapping the thermodynamically defined DNA-binding site of Rap1p we have identified distinct elements contributing to the overall affinity of the protein for its binding site, as graphically summarized in Figure 8. One of these elements is the trinucleotide localized immediately at the 5′ of the consensus sequence, where the putative DNA bending site induced by the protein has been previously localized.27., 28. The interaction of the protein with this trinucleotide (in our case CAA) provides
Rap1p and Rap1-DBD expression and purification
Rap1p was cloned into the baculovirus expression vector pFastBacHTa (Invitrogen), to generate N-terminally 6×His tagged protein. Recombinant baculovirus was generated according to manufacturer's instructions using the Bac-to-Bac system (Invitrogen). Insect Sf21 cells (50 ml) at a density of 5×105 cells/ml were infected with Rap1-expressing baculovirus at m.o.i. of 5–10, and harvested after 48 hours at 30 °C by spinning at 1 k for five minutes at 4 °C. Cell pellet was washed with 30 ml cold PBS
Acknowledgements
We thank D. Rhodes for kindly providing Rap1-DBD. The technical help of M. Giuseppina Iacovella is gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by HFSP grant RGP0207/2001, CNR Genomica Funzionale, Centre of Excellence of Molecular Biology and Medicine (BEMM) La Sapienza, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Scientifica (MURST) grants n. RBNEOIKMT9.001 and 5% BSU and by Consorzio Italiano Biotecnologie (CIB).
References (43)
RAP1: a protean regulator in yeast
Trends Genet.
(1994)The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast
Trends Biochem. Sci.
(1999)- et al.
Alternative mechanisms of transcriptional activation by Rap1p
J. Biol. Chem.
(2001) - et al.
Activator-specific recruitment of TFIID and regulation of ribosomal protein genes in yeast
Mol. Cell
(2002) - et al.
open up! New wrinkles for RAP1 in yeast
Trends Genet.
(2000) - et al.
In vivo topography of Rap1p–DNA complex at Saccharomyces cerevisiae TEF2 UAS(RPG) during transcriptional regulation
J. Mol. Biol.
(2002) Yeast heterochromatin: regulation of its assembly and inheritance by histones
Cell
(1998)- et al.
The crystal structure of the DNA-binding domain of yeast RAP1 in complex with telomeric DNA
Cell
(1996) - et al.
How the multifunctional yeast Rap1p discriminates between DNA target sites: a crystallographic analysis
J. Mol. Biol.
(2000) - et al.
Distortion of the DNA double helix by RAP1 at silencers and multiple telomeric binding sites
J. Mol. Biol.
(1993)
Asymmetric DNA bending induced by the yeast multifunctional factor TUF
J. Biol. Chem.
Imaging the asymmetrical DNA bend induced by repressor activator protein 1 with scanning tunneling microscopy
J. Struct. Biol.
The DNA binding domain and bending angle of E. coli CAP protein
Cell
Contacts between the factor TUF and RPG sequences
J. Biol. Chem.
Alkylating agent and chromatin structure determine sequence context-dependent formation of alkylpurines
J. Mol. Biol.
The dynamics of yeast telomeres and silencing proteins through the cell cycle
J. Struct. Biol.
Relocalization of telomeric Ku and SIR proteins in response to DNA strand breaks in yeast
Cell
Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages
Methods Enzymol.
Coordinate expression of ribosomal protein genes in yeast as a function of cellular growth rate
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
Promoter-specific binding of Rap1 revealed by genome-wide maps of protein–DNA association
Nature Genet.
Transcriptional regulatory networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Science
Cited by (12)
Alternative arrangements of telomeric recognition sites regulate the binding mode of the DNA-binding domain of yeast Rap1
2015, Biophysical ChemistryCitation Excerpt :For this substrate, formation of a super-shift becomes evident at 300 nM DNA (Fig. 4a) and even more so at 1 μM DNA (Fig. 4b), consistent with the expectation that when the half-site is centrally positioned the higher affinity for this site hampers the binding of a second molecule of Rap1DBD. Interestingly, the affinity of the singly-ligated complex for HEMI-L is diminished compared to HEMI, strongly suggesting that the base-pairs flanking the half-site provide extra stabilization of the complex [24]. We note that similar effects on the apparent affinity of the singly-ligated complex are also present for the TeloS substrates, when the size of the handle region is decreased (see Supporting Information).
Rap1 binds single-stranded DNA at telomeric double- and single-stranded junctions and competes with Cdc13 protein
2011, Journal of Biological ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Although this is an unpredicted feature, S. cerevisiae Rap1 is known to be very versatile in its binding because it functions as a transcriptional activator and/or repressor at a huge amount of different promoters throughout the genome (32, 33). Thus, S. cerevisiae Rap1 has been reported to have a loosely defined consensus sequence and has also been shown to have a high flexibility in its binding both to promoters and to telomere DNA (34–36). However, the new mode of binding over the ds-ss junction presented here is unprecedented and adds a new level of complexity to the functionality of Rap1.
The transcriptional repressor activator protein Rap1p is a direct regulator of TATA-binding protein
2008, Journal of Biological ChemistryEffect of Rap1 binding on DNA distortion and potassium permanganate hypersensitivity
2013, Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological CrystallographyDNA binding modes influence Rap1 activity in the regulation of telomere length and MRX functions at DNA ends
2020, Nucleic Acids Research