ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Journal of Molecular Biology
Volume 337, Issue 2, 19 March 2004, Pages 485-496
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (712 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.082    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Is 2-Phosphoglycerate-dependent Automodification of Bacterial Enolases Implicated in their Export?

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Grégory Boël1, 2, , Vianney Pichereau2, Ivan Mijakovic1, Alain Mazé1, 2, Sandrine Poncet1, Sylvie Gillet3, Jean-Christophe Giard2, Axel Hartke2, Yanick Auffray2 and Josef DeutscherCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, 1

1 Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaire, CNRS/INRA/INA-PG UMR 2585, F-78850, Thiverval-Grignon, France

2 Laboratoire de Microbiologie de l'Environnement, USC INRA-EA956, I.B.F.A. Université de Caen, F-14032, Caen, France

3 Institut de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS UMR 8619, Université de Paris-Sud, F-91405, Orsay, France


Received 26 September 2003; 
Revised 15 December 2003; 
accepted 17 December 2003
Edited by I. B. Holland 
Available online 3 February 2004.

Abstract

We observed that in vivo and in vitro a small fraction of the glycolytic enzyme enolase became covalently modified by its substrate 2-phosphoglycerate (2-PG). In modified Escherichia coli enolase, 2-PG was bound to Lys341, which is located in the active site. An identical reversible modification was observed with other bacterial enolases, but also with enolase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and rabbit muscle. An equivalent of Lys341, which plays an important role in catalysis, is present in enolase of all organisms. Covalent binding of 2-PG to this amino acid rendered the enzyme inactive. Replacement of Lys341 of E. coli enolase with other amino acids prevented the automodification and in most cases strongly reduced the activity. As reported for other bacteria, a significant fraction of E. coli enolase was found to be exported into the medium. Interestingly, all Lys341 substitutions prevented not only the automodification, but also the export of enolase. The K341E mutant enolase was almost as active as the wild-type enzyme and therefore allowed us to establish that the loss of enolase export correlates with the loss of modification and not the loss of glycolytic activity.

Author Keywords: enolase; automodification; 2-phosphoglycerate; glycolysis; protein export

IPTG, isopropyl β-Image -1-thiogalactopyranoside; LB, Luria–Bertani; NTA, nitrilotriacetic acid; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; 2-PG, 2-phosphoglycerate; 3-PG, 3-phosphoglycerate

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Detection of in vivo modified Enterococcus faecalis proteins
2.2. In vitro phosphorylation experiments
2.3. Which amino acid becomes modified in enolase?
2.4. Enolase is modified by one of its substrates/products
2.5. Modification of enolase does not require other enzymes
2.6. Modification of enolase from other organisms
2.7. Entire PEP or 2-PG is attached to modified enolase
2.8. Only a small fraction of enolase becomes modified
2.9. Modification with PEP or 2-PG inactivates enolase
2.10. E. coli enolase binds 2-PG to Lys341
2.11. Mutations in the eno gene preventing the modification of enolase
2.12. Mutations preventing the modification of enolase also prevent its export
2.13. Why is not all extracellular enolase modified?
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Strains and growth conditions
3.2. Purification of His-tagged enolases
3.3. Purification of His-tagged E. coli enolase from the medium
3.4. HPLC chromatography
3.5. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis
3.6. SDS/ or urea/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
3.7. In vivo modification of E. coli enolase
3.8. Synthesis of [32P]PEP and [14C]PEP
3.9. In vitro modification and demodification
3.10. Separation of phospho-amino acids
3.11. Enolase assays
3.12. HPLC–ESI–tandem mass spectrometry
Acknowledgements
References









Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author

Present address: G. Boël, The Public Health Research Institute at the International Center for Public Health, 225 Warren Street; Newark, NJ 07103-3535, USA.


Journal of Molecular Biology
Volume 337, Issue 2, 19 March 2004, Pages 485-496
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.