Re-evaluation of the penicillamine challenge test in the diagnosis of Wilson’s disease in children☆
Introduction
Wilson’s disease (WD) is an autosomal recessive disorder of copper metabolism caused by mutations within the ATP7B gene which cause impaired biliary copper excretion resulting in hepatic copper toxicity and subsequent multisystem disease involving the liver, brain, cornea, skeleton and rarely the heart [1], [2]. In childhood hepatic manifestations predominate with a highly variable spectrum ranging from self-limiting hepatitis to fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). Symptomatic patients usually present after 4 years of age with acute hepatitis, FHF, clinical or biochemical signs of chronic liver disease or decompensated cirrhosis [3], [4]. Pre- or asymptomatic patients may accidentally be identified at any age by detecting elevated serum aminotransferase levels during routine laboratory tests done for unrelated reasons or by family screening after a first degree relative has been diagnosed with WD.
Establishing the diagnosis of WD may be problematic because Kayser–Fleischer (KF) rings may be absent and because there is no single reliable biochemical test [5], [6]. The limitations of serum copper, serum ceruloplasmin and basal urinary copper excretion estimations have been reported in several studies (for reference see [6]). Mutational analysis is particularly helpful for primary diagnosis in geographical areas where one mutation predominates, but in Northern Europe and the USA many mutations are found and most patients are compound heterozygotes [7]. Although quantitative hepatic copper analysis is still considered the gold standard [6], in a series of adults 19/114 had liver copper values less than 250 μg/g dry weight [8]. In a series of 17 pediatric WD cases, a urinary copper excretion >25 μmol/24 h following penicillamine was reported to have a specificity of 98.2% and sensitivity of 88.2% [9]. However, the diagnostic value of this penicillamine challenge test (PCT) was discounted by several authorities and different cut-off levels have been proposed [10]. Furthermore, the diagnostic accuracy of PCT has not been ascertained among genotypically confirmed patients. Thus, we re-evaluated this test in a larger series of 38 pediatric patients with WD, 50% of whom had ascertainment of ATP7B genotype, and 60 age-matched controls with non-Wilsonian liver disease.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
Clinical and laboratory data at diagnosis and before initiation of treatment were obtained from 38 children with an ultimate diagnosis of WD referred to King’s College Hospital (19 girls, 19 boys, median age 10.2 years, range 5–16). In all 38 patients a PCT had been performed. Diagnosis of all 38 WD patients was established on a WD score of four or more [11] which was recently also proven to be useful for children [12]. The relevant clinical and laboratory data comprising the WD score and the
Mode of presentation
Sixteen WD patients (8 girls, 8 boys, median age 11.3 years, range 6–15) had various forms of symptomatic liver disease. Thirteen children (6 girls, 7 boys, median age 9.5 years, range 5–15.5) were asymptomatic siblings of an index patient with confirmed WD. Coomb‘s negative hemolytic anemia was the first clinical manifestation in three children (1 girl, 2 boys, median age 9.75 years, range 8.75–10). FHF with encephalopathy was observed in 4 children (3 girls, 1 boy; median age 12 y, range 9–16).
Discussion
All, but one symptomatic patient with WD, had a basal 24 h urinary copper excretion greater than 1.6 μmol/24 h (>100 μg/24 h). 4/13 asymptomatic patients and one with hemolytic anemia did not reach this diagnostic threshold. However, as recently stressed in a guideline on WD a finding greater than 0.6 μmol (>40 μg/24 h) still requires high index of suspicion and should prompt further investigations, particularly in pre- or asymptomatic patients [6]. This is in line with the observations of those five
Acknowledgement
This work was Supported in part by Dr. Fritz Hakl, Director General of the Raiffeisen Landesbank-Tirol AG.
References (19)
- et al.
Wilson’s disease in patients presenting with liver disease: a diagnostic challenge
Gastroenterology
(1997) - et al.
A practice guideline on Wilson disease
Hepatology
(2003) - et al.
Diagnostic value of quantitative hepatic copper determination in patients with Wilson’s Disease
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
(2005) - et al.
Diagnosis of Wilson’s disease in an asymptomatic sibling by DNA linkage analysis
Gastroenterology
(1995) - et al.
The Wilson’s disease gene is a putative copper transporting P-type ATPase similar to the Menkes gene
Nat Genet
(1993) - et al.
Mapping, cloning and genetic characterization of the region containing the Wilson’s disease gene
Nat Genet
(1993) Presenting symptoms and natural history of Wilson disease
Eur J Pediatr
(1987)Regional distribution of mutations of the ATP7B gene in patients with Wilson disease: impact on genetic testing
Hum Genet
(2006)
Cited by (83)
Wilson disease
2023, Comprehensive Guide to Hepatitis AdvancesDevelopmental and Inherited Liver Disease
2023, MacSween's Pathology of the Liver, Eighth EditionNon-invasive diagnosis and follow-up of rare genetic liver diseases
2022, Clinics and Research in Hepatology and GastroenterologyCitation Excerpt :This test does not exclude diagnosis in asymptomatic siblings. In adults with the disease, the predictive values and utility of this test are still poorly defined [8]. Therefore, this test is not currently recommended for use in adults.
Wilson's disease: A master of disguise
2019, Parkinsonism and Related DisordersCitation Excerpt :Affected symptomatic children with WD may also have 24-H urine copper values below the conventional cutoff and lowering this value in pediatric patients has been suggested. 24-hour urine copper test can be also used for therapy monitoring [38–41]. Liver biopsy has been considered a gold standard for the confirmation of the diagnosis and may be still required in patients with predominantly hepatic presentation [30,31].
Diagnosis of Hepatic Wilson Disease
2019, Wilson Disease: Pathogenesis, Molecular Mechanisms, Diagnosis, Treatment and Monitoring
- ☆
R. Staudinger declared that he did not receive funding from the manufacturers to carry out the research. T. Müller declared that he did not receive funding from the manufacturers to carry out the research. He received funding from the Raiffeisen Landesbank Tirol AG which enabled him to carry out the research. U. Siebert declared that he has no relationship with the manufacturers of the drugs involved either in the past or present and did not receive funding from the manufacturers to carry out the research.