Review
Approaches for breaking the barriers of drug permeation through transdermal drug delivery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.09.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) utilizes the skin as executable route for drug administration but the foremost barrier against drug permeability is the stratum corneum and therefore, it limits therapeutic bioavailability of the bioactive. This review focuses on the recent advancements in the TDDS which include iontophoresis, sonophoresis, electroporation, microneedles, magnetophoresis, photomechanical waves and electron beam irradiation. These advancements are exhaustively discussed with techniques involved with their beneficial claims for different categories of bioactive. However, a lot of research has been carried out in TDDS, still the system has many pros and cons such as inconsistent drug release, prevention of burst release formulation and problems related to toxicity. In addition to that, to exploit the TDDS more efficiently scientists have worked on some combinational approaches for manufacturing TDDS viz., chemical–iontophoresis, chemical–electroporation, chemical–ultrasound, iontophoresis–ultrasound, electroporation–iontophoresis electroporation–ultrasound and pressure waves–chemicals and reported the synergistic effect of the same for safe, effective and practical use of TDDS. The present article covers all the above-mentioned aspects in detail and hence the article will assuredly serve as an enlightening tool for the visionaries working in the concerned area.

Introduction

Transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) is an appealing alternative to minimize and avoid the limitations allied with oral and parenteral administration of drugs. Later delivery systems, suffer from certain restrictions like Peak and Valley phenomenon i.e. they exhibit fluctuations in plasma drug levels and do not render sustained effect [1] while the TDDS meets the requisitions and provides a proper and prolonged delivery of drug, in a steady-state profile and reduces the prospects of peak-associated side effects, and ensures that the level of the drug is above the minimal therapeutic concentration. Overall, as a form of controlled drug delivery, transdermal patches are extremely commodious, user-friendly and provides the ease of termination, if need arises (e.g. systemic toxicity) with less pain sensation while administrating drug candidates [2]. Transdermal delivery allows the permeation of drugs across the skin and into the systemic circulation thus avoiding the hepatic first-pass effect observed during oral administration and the inconvenience of frequent parenteral administration [3].

However, the penetration of drugs across the skin and their percutaneous delivery are limited by the barrier function of the enormously organized structure of Stratum corneum (SC) [4]. As we know that, the skin occupies about 15% of the total body weight of an adult and has a surface area of about 2 m2. The skin is a multilayered organ composed of many histological layers generally described in terms of tissue layers i.e. the epidermis and the dermis [5] as shown in (Fig. 1). Epidermis, composed of keratinocyte (95% of cells) which is the principal cell forms a ‘brick and mortar’ structure that has been used to conceptualize the barrier property of skin inclusion melanocytes, langerhans cells and merkel cells (minor components). These cells proliferate and commit daughter cells to terminal differentiation, which ends in the formation of the SC [6]. The corneocytes of hydrated keratin comprise the ‘bricks’, embedded in a ‘mortar’ composed of multiple lipid bilayers of ceramides, fatty acids, cholesterol and cholesterol esters. These bilayers form regions of semi crystalline gel and liquid crystal domains [7]. The second layer beneath the epidermal layer is dermis which is much thicker than the epidermis (usually 1–4 mm). The main components of the dermis are collagen and elastic fibers. Compared to the epidermis, there are much fewer cells and much more fibers in the dermis [8]. TDDS or skin patch is used for the delivery of a controlled dose of a drug through the skin over a period of time [9], [10].

The components of TDDS are liners, adherents, drug reservoirs, drug release membrane etc. [11] that play an imperative role in the release of the drug through the skin as shown in (Fig. 2). It is considered that a well-designed TDDS can supply the drug at a rate, to sustain the required therapeutic plasma concentration without much fluctuation that may cause basic manifestation or therapeutic inefficacy [12]. Lag times to reach steady state fluxes are in hours as the transport of most drugs across the skin is very slow. Attainment of a therapeutically effective drug level is, therefore, difficult without enhancing skin permeation. Consequently, there has been intensive study of strategies to undermine, in a controlled and reversible fashion, the permeability barrier of the SC [13]. A number of techniques have been developed to enhance and control transport across the skin, and enlarge the range of drugs delivered. These involve chemical and physical methods, based on two strategies: increasing skin permeability and/or providing driving force acting on the drug [14]. There have been many ingenious technologies developed to enhance TDDS for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes ranging from chemical enhancers to iontophoresis, electroporation, and pressure waves generated by ultrasound effects or the synergistic mixtures of both the mechanism [15]. The transdermal route has become a most accepted and innovative spotlight for researchers in drug delivery which is proved in quantitative research with around 40% of the drug moiety being under clinical evaluation and also approved by FDA (Food and Drug Administration). The transdermal product has foreseeable future because of its noteworthy upward trend. The TDDS products have continued to provide bona fide therapeutic benefits to patients around the world. In the year 2005, the global market for drug delivery systems was $12.7 B and is projected to be $32 B by 2015 [16]. The fate of effectiveness of TDD system lies on the drug's ability to invade the skin barrier and how its reaches the targeted site [17].

There are many factors which affect the penetration through the skin namely; species differences, skin age and site, skin temperature, state of the skin (normal, abraded, or diseased), area of application, contact time, degree of hydration of the skin, pretreatment of the skin, and physical characteristics of the penetrant. The mechanism of drug penetration through the skin primarily and diffusion is, concentration dependent [18]. Majorly the molecules permeate across the SC by intercellular, intracellular (transcellular) and follicular (appendage) pathways. As per the Elias scheme, SC assumes a structural picture of the two-compartment model [19] as shown in (Fig. 3).

Section snippets

Polymer matrix or matrices

Polymers are employed in skin preparation and it strengthens the foundation of TDDS [20]. Polymer selection and design are of prime importance in this system.

Approaches in the development of transdermal therapeutic system

Several technologies have been successfully developed to provide a rate control over the release and the transdermal permeation of drugs. These technologies are as follows:

Infringing barriers of drug permeation

One challenge in designing of transdermal drug delivery system is to overcome the skin's formidable barrier function. Many intensive researches in the development of strategies is to increase the delivery as well as to facilitate the extraction of molecules for monitoring and diagnostics purposes which are categorized as active and passive means. These are based on two strategies: increasing skin permeability and/or providing driving force acting on the drug.

Newer combinational techniques

A multidisciplinary group of scientists from such diverse disciplines as engineering, pharmaceutical sciences, physics, chemistry, biology, and medicine are collectively working on lowering the skin barrier in a safe, effective, and practical way. Several combinations including chemical–iontophoresis, chemical–electroporation, chemical–ultrasound, iontophoresis–ultrasound, electroporation–iontophoresis electroporation–ultrasound and pressure waves–chemicals have been shown to work

Conclusion

To overcome the problems associated with the oral delivery route, transdermal drug delivery systems are utterly used as an alternative route especially focusing improvements in the elegance, dosage flexibility and patient compliance. This scenario surely remains continued in the future and hence leads to more advancement of modern techniques involved for loading a bioactive in TDDS for overcoming the problems associated with the barrier properties of the skin. The attractiveness of the

Acknowledgment

We are thankful to GDR Educational Society for providing necessary infrastructural facilities. The authors acknowledge Department of Science and Technology (No. SR/FST/LSI-434/2010), New Delhi (SERC Division), India for providing financial assistance under DST-FIST scheme as well as the Maulana Azad National Fellowship (MANF) UGC, New Delhi, India for providing financial assistance.

References (167)

  • C. Valenta et al.

    The use of polymers for dermal and transdermal delivery

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2004)
  • R. Bodmeier et al.

    Drug release from laminated polymeric films prepared from aqueous latexes

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1990)
  • X. Zhan et al.

    A new copolymer membrane controlling clonidine linear release in a transdermal drug delivery system

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2006)
  • A.L. Iordanskii et al.

    Modeling of the drug delivery from a hydrophilic transdermal therapeutic system across polymer membrane

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2000)
  • R.D. Toddywala et al.

    Effect of physicochemical properties of adhesive on the release, skin permeation and adhesiveness of adhesive-type transdermal drug delivery systems (a-TDD) containing silicone-based pressure-sensitive adhesives

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1991)
  • M. Schulz et al.

    Drug release and adhesive properties of crospovidone-containing matrix patches based on polyisobutene and acrylic adhesives

    Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2010)
  • E. Gutschke et al.

    Adhesion testing of transdermal matrix patches with a probe tack test–in vitro and in vivo evaluation

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2010)
  • H.S. Tan et al.

    Pressure-sensitive adhesives for transdermal drug delivery systems

    Pharm. Sci. Technol. Today

    (1999)
  • R.J. Babu et al.

    Effect of penetration enhancers on the release and skin permeation of bupranolol from reservoir-type transdermal delivery systems

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2005)
  • R.H. Guy et al.

    Transdermal drug delivery: a simplified pharmacokinetic approach

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1985)
  • S.S. Agrawal et al.

    Development and evaluation of matrix type transdermal patch of ethinylestradiol and medroxyprogesterone acetate for anti-implantation activity in female Wistar rats

    Contraception

    (2011)
  • D.I. Nesseem et al.

    Development of novel transdermal self-adhesive films for tenoxicam, an anti-inflammatory drug

    Life Sci.

    (2011)
  • H. Xi et al.

    Transdermal patches for site-specific delivery of anastrozole: in vitro and local tissue disposition evaluation

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2010)
  • Y.-C. Ah et al.

    A novel transdermal patch incorporating meloxicam: in vitro and in vivo characterization

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2010)
  • Y. Sun et al.

    A drug-in-adhesive transdermal patch for S-amlodipine free base: in vitro and in vivo characterization

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2009)
  • J. Yang et al.

    Influence of hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin on transdermal penetration and photostability of avobenzone

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2008)
  • A. Melero et al.

    Nortriptyline hydrochloride skin absorption: development of a transdermal patch

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2008)
  • N.T. Hai et al.

    Formulation and biopharmaceutical evaluation of transdermal patch containing benztropine

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2008)
  • N. Shinkai et al.

    Intra-articular penetration of ketoprofen and analgesic effects after topical patch application in rats

    J. Control. Release

    (2008)
  • C.M. Heard et al.

    In vitro transdermal delivery of caffeine, theobromine, theophylline and catechin from extract of Guarana, Paullinia Cupana

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2006)
  • S. Mutalik et al.

    Glipizide matrix transdermal systems for diabetes mellitus: preparation, in vitro and preclinical studies

    Life Sci.

    (2006)
  • R. Panchagnula et al.

    Transdermal delivery of naloxone: skin permeation, pharmacokinetic, irritancy and stability studies

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2005)
  • S.C. Shin et al.

    Development of tretinoin gels for enhanced transdermal delivery

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2005)
  • B. Mukherjee et al.

    A comparison between povidone–ethylcellulose and povidone–eudragit transdermal dexamethasone matrix patches based on in vitro skin permeation

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2005)
  • S. Davaran et al.

    Development of a novel prolonged-release nicotine transdermal patch

    Pharmacol. Res.

    (2005)
  • M. Guyot et al.

    Design and in vitro evaluation of adhesive matrix for transdermal delivery of propranolol

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2000)
  • A. Koizumi et al.

    Effect of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone on skin permeation of estradiol

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2004)
  • G.G. Agyralides et al.

    Development and in vitro evaluation of furosemide transdermal formulations using experimental design techniques

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2004)
  • M. Aqil et al.

    Monolithic matrix type transdermal drug delivery systems of pinacidil monohydrate: in vitro characterisation

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2002)
  • S. Sridevi et al.

    Optimized transdermal delivery of ketoprofen using pH and hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin as co-enhancers

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2002)
  • P. Mura et al.

    Evaluation of transcutol as a clonazepam transdermal permeation enhancer from hydrophilic gel formulations

    Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2000)
  • R. Valjakka-Koskela et al.

    Transdermal delivery of levosimendan

    Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2000)
  • P. Chedgzoy et al.

    Triclosan: release from transdermal adhesive formulations and in vitro permeation across human epidermal membranes

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2002)
  • C. Ren et al.

    Design and in vivo evaluation of an indapamide transdermal patch

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2009)
  • P. Mayorga et al.

    Interpretation and prediction of plasma levels of primaquine following transdermal delivery in Swiss mice

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1997)
  • G. Sathyan et al.

    Transdermal delivery of tacrine: I. Identification of a suitable delivery vehicle

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1995)
  • P. Karande et al.

    Enhancement of transdermal drug delivery via synergistic action of chemicals

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (2009)
  • J. Choi et al.

    Effect of fatty acids on the transdermal delivery of donepezil: in vitro and in vivo evaluation

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2012)
  • W. He et al.

    Study on the mechanisms of chitosan and its derivatives used as transdermal penetration enhancers

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2009)
  • K. Vavrova et al.

    Permeation enhancer dodecyl 6-(dimethylamino)hexanoate increases transdermal and topical delivery of adefovir: influence of pH, ion-pairing and skin species

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (446)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Note: The first and third authors shall be considered as the main authors.

    View full text