Modeling phosphate transport and removal in a compact bed filled with a mineral-based sorbent for domestic wastewater treatment
Graphical abstract
Modeled calcium, modeled PO4 and mean (n = 2) measured PO4 concentrations (a) and modeled and mean measured pH (b) in the filter effluent vs. bed volumes at a loading rate of 97 ± 3 L m− 2 d− 1.
Introduction
Filters containing mineral-based alkaline materials have been shown to be viable options for removing dissolved phosphorus (PO4) from pre-treated domestic wastewater in on-site facilities. Numerous materials could be used in such filters (Johansson Westholm, 2006, Vohla et al., 2011), but full-scale field-based investigations are costly and time-consuming. Thus, the potential utility, performance and longevity of various materials for this purpose have been mostly investigated in laboratory-scale batch and column experiments (Johansson Westholm, 2006, Vohla et al., 2011). A problem associated with this approach is that conditions in full-scale applications may differ considerably from laboratory conditions. Thus, robust models of the transport of solutes and removal of PO4 in laboratory-scale filter columns are required for screening candidate materials, investigating probable scale-up effects and optimizing operational parameters. However, in order to model the retention of PO4 in filters successfully, a better understanding of PO4 removal mechanisms and reactions that could lead to the formation of P-compounds in them is required. In previous research, some reactive phases (Gustafsson et al., 2008) and some P compounds generated in selected filter materials have been identified (Eveborn et al., 2009, Gustafsson et al., 2008). Generally, for instance, calcium-based filter materials release calcium ions to the solution phase through kinetically constrained dissolution processes and calcium-P compounds are subsequently precipitated at high pH (Gustafsson et al., 2008).
Despite such recent advances, the PO4 retention and P product formation mechanisms are still not fully understood. Thus, the overall aim of the study presented here was to develop a model describing the transport and removal of PO4 in a reactive filter using the hydro-geochemical transport code PHREEQC (Parkhurst and Appelo, 2011). The modeling focused on the removal of the PO4 in a compact filter filled with a calcium-silicate sorbent. However, the developed model also provides more general indications of possible reactions involved in the removal of PO4 from filtered solutions.
Section snippets
General description of the research strategy
The hydro-geochemical transport code PHREEQC (Parkhurst and Appelo, 2011), was used to model the transport and reactions of PO4 solutes observed in previous experiments with two replicates of laboratory-scale filter columns described in detail by Herrmann et al. (2013). Briefly, a solution containing 13 mg L− 1 P in the form of dissolved potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4), with a redox potential of 304 mV and a pH of 5, was passed through the columns and the concentrations of PO4 in the eluate
Results and discussion
In this section, results of the analysis of the material are first presented, then the experimental data and model outputs are compared.
Conclusions
The models developed in this study using the hydro-geochemical transport code PHREEQC successfully simulated the removal of PO4 in laboratory-scale filter columns containing the calcium-silicate sorbent Filtralite® P. The simulations suggest that calcium oxide (CaO), the calcium-silicate phase wollastonite and calcite supplied the Ca2 + and OH− ions required for PO4 precipitation. They also suggest that the only precipitated Ca–P compound was amorphous tricalcium phosphate (ATCP, Ca3(PO4)2).
Acknowledgments
The financial support of the Swedish Research Council Formas is gratefully acknowledged. We also acknowledge Dr. Allan Holmgren from Luleå University of Technology for helping us with FTIR spectroscopy.
References (20)
- et al.
Apparent solubilities of two amorphous calcium phosphates and of octacalcium phosphate in the temperature range 30–42 °C
J. Cryst. Growth
(1990) - et al.
Phosphate removal by mineral-based sorbents used in filters for small-scale wastewater treatment
Water Res.
(2008) Substrates for phosphorus removal — potential benefits for on-site wastewater treatment?
Water Res.
(2006)- et al.
Phosphorus retention processes in shell sand filter systems treating municipal wastewater
Ecol. Eng.
(2005) - et al.
Filter materials for phosphorus removal from wastewater in treatment wetlands — a review
Ecol. Eng.
(2011) - et al.
MINTEQA2/PRODEFA2. A geochemical assessment model for environmental systems, version 3.0
Users' Manual
(1991) - et al.
Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution
(2005) Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media
(1972)- et al.
CODATA Key Values for Thermodynamics
(1989) - et al.
New evidence for rejuvenation of phosphorus retention capacity in EAF steel slag
Environ. Sci. Technol.
(2008)
Cited by (8)
Review of soil phosphorus routines in ecosystem models
2020, Environmental Modelling and SoftwareCitation Excerpt :LASCAM distinguishes only between organic/adsorbed P and soluble P (Viney et al., 2000). PHREEQC (Herrmann et al., 2013; Moharami and Jalali, 2014) takes a very different approach, since it is a hydro-geochemical transport model and therefore depicts the actual chemical compounds. The question of which of these methods produces the best results is not easy to answer, as all methods have advantages and disadvantages.
Long-term phosphorus removal in land treatment systems: Evaluation, experiences, and opportunities
2017, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and TechnologyEffect of polyvalent ions in the formation of ionic-liquid-based aqueous biphasic systems
2014, Journal of Physical Chemistry B