Fibula free flap pedicle ossification: Experience of two centres and a review of the literature

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2018.06.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The osteogenic potential of vascularized periosteum has been described in a few cases in the literature, and many different factors have been pointed out as plausible. Our aim was to review the literature in order to give a complete overview of this topic and to report on our clinical experience.

Patients & Methods

Our experience includes three patients who underwent maxillectomy and FFF reconstruction. A progressive reduction in mouth opening was noticed in the months after surgery, and CT scans showed calcified tissue around the pedicle. Surgical revisions were performed. No recurrences were noticed. A full systematic literature review was conducted, including studies published on or before September 2016.

Results

Clinically, free flap pedicle ossification is presented as trismus, hard swelling, and severe pain during movements, although the diagnosis is scarce and often fortuitous. From January 2010 to January 2016 we performed 68 FFF reconstructions, and the incidence of FFF pedicle ossification in our experience was 4.4%.

Conclusion

Ossification of FFF pedicle is uncommon, but when it occurs, it has dramatic clinical consequences. Follow-up CT scan can be useful in diagnosis. In our experience, surgery should be performed only when the patient is symptomatic.

Introduction

Mandibular integrity can be affected by a variety of causes, including infection, benign and malignant cancers, osteoradionecrosis, and trauma. Restoration of mandibular integrity after such conditions is pivotal in restoring form and function (Heyden et al., 2012).

Fibula free flap (FFF) is a routinely used free flap for oromaxillary and oromandibular bony defect reconstruction, due to its low donor site morbidities, great length of harvestable bone (while preserving the integrity of the knee and ankle joints), the possibility for implant and prosthetic rehabilitation/restoration (osteointegrated dental implants), and the potential combination of multiple skin flaps. Multiple osteotomies can be performed to shape the flap in order to achieve the best match and the best contour possible (Hidalgo, 1989, Hidalgo, 1994).

The osteogenic potential of vascularized periosteum has been studied and described in a few cases in the literature, and many different factors have been pointed out as plausible (Finley et al., 1978).

Clinically, free flap pedicle ossification is presented as trismus, hard swelling, and severe pain during movements (mastication, ipsilateral neck rotation), although the diagnosis is scarce and often fortuitous.

The purpose of this article is to review the literature in order to evaluate clinical and epidemiological aspects, pathological characteristics, and treatment of the FFF, while reporting on our recent cases of FFF pedicle ossification.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

A full, systematic literature review was carried out, to include studies published up to the end of September 2016. Pubmed was used as an electronic database. The principal keywords used were ‘pedicle ossification’ and ‘fibula free flap’.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) patients had ossification of the vascular pedicle of the FFF; 2) articles were published in Italian or English. No articles were subsequently excluded.

In addition, we included three patients diagnosed and treated at

Results

Ossification of the vascular pedicle in a vascularised osseous free flap has been reported 10 times in the literature since 1997. The additional cases from our institution are outlined below.

Discussion

In 1997 Deschler et al. (Deschler and Hayden, 1997) first described a bone spur, presenting as a mass, as a sign of FFF pedicle ossification. They noticed that this consistently occurred in regions where vascularised periosteum was present (Klotch et al, 1995, Ishida et al, 1996), and that periosteal osteogenesis was also affected by the tissue in direct proximity to the osteogenic inner cambium layer of the periosteum (Ishida et al, 1996, Wlodarski, 1989).

Periosteum transferred into contact

Conclusions

Three new cases of FFF pedicle ossification were presented in this study, together with a review of literature.

Ossification of FFF pedicles is rare, but when it occurs, it has dramatic clinical consequences, so maxillofacial surgeons must be aware of this process.

Diagnosis can be fortuitous, but an X-ray study together with clinical presentations can help in confirming diagnosis.

We strongly advise surgery to be carried out only in cases when pedicle ossification is symptomatic and there is no

Declarations of interest

None.

All authors have read the Helsinki Declaration and followed the guidelines in this investigation.

Acknlowledgements

All authors contributed to the investigation; in particular:

C. Baserga: conception and design of the study; drafting of the article; final approval of the version to be submitted.

O. Massarelli: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be submitted.

A. Bolzoni: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be submitted.

D. S. Rossi: conception and design of the study; critical

References (27)

  • G. Colletti et al.

    Technical refinements in mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps: outcome-oriented retrospective review of 99 cases

    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital

    (2014)
  • J.M. Finley et al.

    Revascularized periosteal grafts — a new method to produce functional new bone without bone grafting

    Plat Reconstr Surg

    (1978)
  • C.M. Glastonbury et al.

    Ossification of the vascular pedicle in microsurgical fibular free flap reconstruction of the head and neck

    Am J Neuroradiol

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo, 120126 - Milano, Italy.

    View full text