Major article
Improvement in motor development following surgery for infantile esotropia

Presented at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Seattle, Washington, April 11-15, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.08.013Get rights and content

Purpose

Infantile esotropia is associated with abnormal visual development and thus may delay the achievement of developmental milestones. Although early surgery can improve visual function, less is known about its effect on motor development. Here we address whether early surgery can improve motor development.

Methods

Recently, our lab devised the Infant Developmental Skills Survey, a 25-item questionnaire designed to assess sensorimotor and gross motor development. The questionnaire was completed by the parents of 3- to 10-month-old patients with infantile esotropia prior to surgery (n = 143) and the parents of 6- to 11-month-old patients following surgery (n = 58). A subset of parents (n = 40) completed the questionnaire both before and after surgery. For comparison, the questionnaire was completed by the parents of infants with normal ocular alignment (n = 194).

Results

Before surgery 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 9-, and 10-month-old patients showed delayed achievement of sensorimotor milestones (p < 0.01), and 5-, 9-, and 10-month-old patients demonstrated delayed attainment of gross motor milestones (p < 0.05) compared with normal children. However, following surgery, patients demonstrated a greater rate of sensorimotor development than age-matched controls (p < 0.0001) and caught up with normal children on both sensorimotor and gross motor skills.

Conclusions

Prior to surgery, patients with infantile esotropia were delayed in their achievement of developmental milestones. However, following surgery, a comparison group of patients showed rapid development and possessed motor skills comparable to those of normal children, suggesting that early surgery is beneficial to both visual and motor development.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants included 161 patients diagnosed with infantile esotropia with constant esodeviations of ≥30Δ. Patients ranged from 3 to 11 months of age and were referred by 14 pediatric ophthalmologists in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. All patients were diagnosed by 6 months of age and average age at surgery was 7.1 months (SD = 1.8 months). All patients were free from neurological and systemic disorders. For comparison, a control group of 194 three- to 11-month-old, full-term, healthy infants with

Presurgery Group versus Control Group

Sensorimotor and gross motor scores of the presurgery group are compared with those of the control group as a function of age in Figure 1A and B. Relative to the control group, the presurgery group showed delayed achievement on both sensorimotor milestones (F1,311 = 70.09, p < 0.0001) and gross motor milestones (F1,311 = 13.75, p < 0.0005). Planned comparisons indicated that the delay of sensorimotor milestones was significant at 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10 months of age (p < 0.01). Delay of gross

Discussion

Our findings indicate that children with infantile esotropia exhibited delayed achievement of developmental milestones prior to surgery. The impairment of sensorimotor development was particularly profound and was evident at virtually all ages assessed. This result is predictable as the majority of sensorimotor milestones included in the questionnaire are visually demanding (eg, grasping a toy, grasping tiny objects, following a moving toy). Therefore, if a child has abnormal binocular function

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Christina S. Cheng and Lauren Wyatt for their assistance in data collection.

References (24)

  • E.E. Birch et al.

    Infant random dot stereoacuity cards

    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus

    (1998)
  • O. Levtzion-Korach et al.

    Early motor development of blind children

    J Paediatr Child Health

    (2000)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Strabismus Surgery Decreases the Risk of Injuries in Pediatric Patients in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse

      2022, American Journal of Ophthalmology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite this strong evidence for subnormal motor skills in strabismic children, there is little research related to whether motor skills improve after strabismus surgery. In 2008, a study of infants less than 1 year of age undergoing surgery for infantile esotropia evaluated the results of a parental survey on gross motor skills via the Infant Developmental Skills Survey before and after surgery.19 The results of the parental surveys suggested that children with infantile esotropia had delayed attainment of gross motor milestones preoperatively, but there was a catch-up to age-matched peers postoperatively.

    • Maternal smoking during pregnancy and long-term ophthalmic morbidity of the offspring

      2021, Early Human Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      Solberg and his colleagues [25] demonstrated how prenatal exposure to smoking significantly increases the risk for esotropia (a sub-category of visual disturbance). The importance of this finding was demonstrated over a decade ago when Drover and his colleagues [26] showed how children with esotropia had reached motor development milestone slower than their counterparts. A systematic review published in 2015 [15] had found higher rates of strabismus (both esotropia and exotropia), refractive errors (both of which belong to the sub-category of visual disturbance) and retinopathy, among children of women who smoked during pregnancy.

    • Global motion perception is related to motor function in 4.5-year-old children born at risk of abnormal development

      2017, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The secondary aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between clinical measures of visual function (stereopsis and visual acuity) and visuomotor control in the same group of children. Disorders of binocular vision such as amblyopia and strabismus disrupt normal development of visually guided reaching and grasping (Grant & Conway, 2015; Grant & Moseley, 2011; Grant, Suttle, Melmoth, Conway, & Sloper, 2014; Grant et al., 2007; Mazyn, Lenoir, Montagne, Delaey, & Savelsbergh, 2007; Melmoth et al., 2009; O’Connor, Birch, Anderson, & Draper, 2010b; Suttle, Melmoth, Finlay, Sloper, & Grant, 2011) and impair performance on standardized tests of fine motor function (Caputo et al., 2007; Drover, Stager, Morale, Leffler, & Birch, 2008; Hrisos, Clarke, Kelly, Henderson, & Wright, 2006; Rogers, Chazan, Fellows, & Tsou, 1982; Webber, Wood, Gole, & Brown, 2008; Webber, Wood, & Thompson, 2016). However, the relationship between stereoacuity and fine motor function in normally developing children may be limited to specific tasks.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by a grant from the National Eye Institute (EY05236).

    This study was conducted at the Retina Foundation of the Southwest.

    The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

    View full text