Salmon by-product storage and oil extraction
Introduction
Marine lipids are receiving a lot of attention because of the health benefits associated with high levels of the long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Decreased rates of cardiovascular disease have been noted in populations with high fish consumption, such as Alaskan Natives (Middaugh, 1990, Newman et al., 1993) and the omega-3 fatty acids are believed to be associated with these health benefits (Shahidi & Miraliakbari, 2004). High levels of DHA are found in brain tissue and DHA is essential during brain development and retina formation of infants (Hoffman & Uauy, 1992). Even with the plethora of scientific evidence on beneficial effects, the consumption of omega-3 PUFA in western diet is low and alternative ways of incorporating fish oil are being explored (Nielsen, Debnath, & Jacobsen, 2007).
In Alaska there was an estimated 110,000 Mt of by-products available for production from Alaska pacific salmon in 2005 (Bechtel, 2007). The two major by-products from the processing line of salmon in Alaska are heads and viscera, with the roe removed. Wild pink and red salmon are harvested in large quantities in Alaska and pink salmon by-products have been reported to contain 10.9% oil in heads and 2% oil in viscera (Bechtel, 2003). Alaska pink salmon by-products oils were evaluated by Oliveira and Bechtel (2005) and are a good source of omega-3 fatty acid. These salmon by-products are processed into oil and meals at some location; however much of the by-products is not utilised and there are issues associated with acquiring and processing them. The ability to process salmon by-products or refrigerate large volumes of by-product are absent, especially at small remote processing plants and this problem often results in the by-products being discarded. Another problem is the during peak production by-product processing capacity can not keep up with by-product accumulation and the raw material could remain unrefrigerated for days before processing. When storage time is prolonged and temperature increased, the raw by-product quality and freshness is decreased. Degradation of by-product proceeds rapidly due to the presence of enzymes and bacteria (Ashie, Smith, & Simpson, 1996). There is no literature evaluating the storage of salmon by-products or the oil extracted from salmon by-products.
In addition to the omega-3 PUFA, fish oil also contained natural fat soluble antioxidants. While most of the focus has been on the omega-3 PUFA little information on antioxidant properties are available. Antioxidants are important because of there ability to scavenge free radicals, which can reduce oxidation and other damaging reactions in food and biological systems. Marine oils are highly unsaturated and very susceptible to oxidation during exposure to oxygen, light, and heat (Lytle, Lytle, Newmark, & Deschner, 1992). In addition, oxidative as well as hydrolytic stability can differ greatly among different fish species (Boran, Karacam, & Boran, 2006). Some of these differences are due to the level of protection from naturally occurring antioxidants. Vitamin E and carotenoids are antioxidants found in wild salmon oil (Johnston et al., 2006). Incorporation of synthetic antioxidant is routinely used to maintain oil quality from rendered animal products; however, the addition is accomplished after oil extraction.
There are many methods used to measure antioxidant activity including the measurement of total fat soluble antioxidant activity using a photochemiluminescence (PCL) method (Besco et al., 2007, Harrison and Were, 2007, Lee et al., 2004, Sacchetti et al., 2005). The PCL method generates photochemical superoxide anion and uses a chemiluminescent detection system in the measurement of antioxidant activity (Popov & Lewin, 1996). One of the advantages of using PCL is that it assesses the total antioxidant activities, thus synergistic effects are accounted for using this procedure.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of the extracted crude oil from raw pink salmon by-products (heads and viscera) stored for 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 days at two different temperatures (6 and 15 °C) by determining free fatty acid levels (FFA), fatty acid profile and total fat soluble antioxidant activities.
Section snippets
Sampling
Fresh Alaska pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) by-products were obtained from a commercial fish-processing plant in Kodiak, AK. Salmon were caught on the 6th of August 2006 and kept on ice until processed in a commercial plant on the following day. Heads and viscera were collected randomly from the fish processing line. The roe had been separated from viscera samples on the line. Immediately after collection, head and viscera samples were combined and approximately 40 L was stored at either 6
Results and discussion
The FFA values in raw salmon heads and viscera increased with storage time and temperature (Fig. 1). FFA values were used as the quality indicator of oil and a significant difference (p < 0.05) from the starting material was noted at day 1 for both temperatures (Fig. 1). Storage temperatures of 6 and 15 °C were chosen to reflect the colder temperatures that often prevail in Alaska on the Gulf of Alaska coast. The 15 °C samples had significantly (p < 0.05) higher FFA values than the 6 °C samples on
Conclusions
Raw pink salmon by-product (heads and viscera) were aged at two temperatures to examine the quality of oils extracted. Although the free fatty acid content increased 3–6-fold during storage at 6 °C and 15 °C the values were in the acceptable range for many uses and the fatty acid profiles were similar. The levels of fat soluble endogenous antioxidant activity measured in Trolox equivalency units was reduced over 50%; however, substantial fat soluble antioxidant activity remained after 4 day of
Acknowledgments
We thank the University of Alaska, School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, Fishery Industrial Technology Center for providing processing facilities.
References (25)
By-products from seafood processing for aquaculture and animal feeds
- et al.
The use of photochemiluminescence for the measurement of integral antioxidant capacity of baobab products
Food Chemistry
(2007) - et al.
Changes in the quality of fish oil due to storage temperature and time
Food Chemistry
(2006) - et al.
Muscle and flesh quality traits in wild and farmed Atlantic salmon
Aquaculture
(2006) - et al.
Effect of gamma irradiation on total phenolic content yield and antioxidant capacity of almond skin extracts
Food Chemistry
(2007) - et al.
Atherosclerosis in Alaska natives and non-natives
Lancet
(1993) - et al.
Photochemiluminescent detection of antiradical activity; IV: testing of lipid-soluble antioxidants
Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods
(1996) - et al.
Comparative evaluation of 11 essential oils of different origin as functional antioxidants, antiradicals and antimicrobials in foods
Food Chemistry
(2005) - et al.
Compositional characteristics of muscle and visceral oil from steelhead trout and their oxidative stability
Food Chemistry
(2007) - et al.
Composition and stability of herring oil recovered from sorted byproducts as compared to oil from mix byproducts
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
(2002)
Spoilage and shelf-life extension of fresh fish and shellfish
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Cited by (67)
Identification and comparison of palmitoleic acid (C16:1 n-7)-derived lipids in marine fish by-products by UHPLC-Q-exactive orbitrap mass spectrometry
2023, Journal of Food Composition and AnalysisLipidomic signature of Pacific lean fish species head and skin using gas chromatography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
2021, Food ChemistryCitation Excerpt :Oleic acid (18:1 n9) and palmitic acid (C16:0) were found to be the major MUFA and SFA respectively across all of the samples (Table 2). In general, fish and fish by-products are reported to contain oleic acid and palmitic acid as the dominant MUFA and SFA, respectively (Wu & Bechtel, 2008; Zhang, Tao, Zhao, Wang, & Wang, 2019), which is in agreement with the present study. Body (1983) analysed the fatty acid composition in head and skin of ribaldo and found that there was 22.5 % and 23.5 % palmitic acid in the lipid of the head and skin samples, respectively, which is closer to the value found in the present study for skin samples (26.8 %).
Supercritical CO<inf>2</inf> extraction of oil from Arctic charr side streams from filleting processing
2021, Innovative Food Science and Emerging TechnologiesLipid extraction from Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) by-product in low-voltage DC electric field and its mechanism
2021, Journal of Cleaner ProductionRecovery of high-value compounds from food by-products
2021, Food Engineering Innovations Across the Food Supply Chain