Evaluation study for the integration of electromagnetic transients simulator and transient stability simulator

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2004.07.014Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the development of a hybrid simulator which integrates the electromagnetic transients (EMT) simulator and transient stability (TS) simulator. It discusses how two very different simulators can be coordinated to work together and produce accurate solution. A new selection approach is presented to identify the interaction location for interfacing the EMT and TS simulators. Pseudo-transient caused by frequency mismatch during the interaction is discussed with remedy presented. Based on the interaction protocol proposed in the paper, case studies were performed on two test systems, 9-bus systems and 39-bus systems, to assess the performance of the integration on both EMT and TS aspects.

Introduction

The aim of this work presented in this paper is to develop a new broadband digital power system simulator (hybrid simulator), which will provide simulation of large systems, including detailed modeling of parts of the system, while employing minimum processing resources. Currently, electromagnetic transients (EMT) simulators provide high time-resolution simulation of power systems, including device-level models of power electronic devices. However they are computationally very demanding and are not ideal for simulation of very large systems. Transient stability (TS) simulators, on the other hand, have a very fast simulation speed and can handle very large networks, but with compromised time resolution. Consequently power electronic devices and control systems can only be represented as modified steady-state models, and are not modeled at the device level.

A hybrid simulation takes advantage of the computational inexpensive dynamic representation of the main network in a stability program with the accurate dynamic modeling of the remaining components using EMT modeling. The underlying idea of the hybrid simulation is to partition a network into two parts, one for the TS program and the other for the EMT program. Of course, in order to exploit the speed advantage of the TS program, the part simulated by the TS program should include most components of the system, while the part simulated by the EMT program would contain the components that require detailed simulation, as well as parts of the network close to where they are connected. Thus, the slow dynamics of machines are adequately modeled by the stability program while the fast dynamic responses of selected devices are accurately represented by EMT simulation models.

In the early eighties, Heffernan et al. [1] first proposed to interface two distinct simulators for solving HVAC–HVDC systems. They modeled an HVDC link in detail within a stability based ac system framework, thus exploiting the advantages of both EMT program and TS program. They achieved this by running the TS program and EMT program concurrently with periodic coordination of the results. Reeve and Adapa [2] proposed that the location of interface should be extended into the ac network further for taking into consideration of the effect of harmonics generated by power electronics on the ac network. Anderson et al. [3] presented another approach to take the harmonics into account. In the EMT program, the network part simulated by the TS program is represented by frequency-dependent equivalent, instead of a simple fundamental frequency equivalent circuit used by Heffernan and Reeve.

The paper presented by Sultan et al. [4] basically adopts the approaches described above, i.e. extending the interface location into the ac network to some extent, and at the same time representing the network simulated by the TS program with frequency-dependent equivalent. Also, Kasztenny and Kezunovic [5] have discussed a general method for linking different modeling techniques such as waveform-type, phasor-type, and algebraic-type simulation techniques into one complete model.

This paper is devoted to the theoretical analysis and performance evaluation of the hybrid simulation. Issues on the establishment of proper interaction between the EMT and TS simulators are discussed. A new approach to selecting the interface location, techniques to overcome the waveform distortion caused by frequency mismatch during the transient and interaction protocol are presented. Full assessments of the hybrid simulation, from the points of view of TS and EMT, on two different sized power networks are also given.

Section snippets

Overview of hybrid simulation

The basic approach adopted for the development of the hybrid simulator is to incorporate both the detailed device-level simulation and system wide functional modeling within an integrated analysis tool [6]. The two simulations proceed in parallel and communicate with each other at specified common points in time as shown in Fig. 1. With the interchange of information each part of the network is represented to the other by a dynamically updated equivalent.

The parts of the network modeled in EMT

The external system

In order to ensure that the hybrid simulation can predict the correct dynamics of the detailed system, the EMT simulator requires the external system to be represented by a correct driving point impedance. The TS simulation is a fundamental frequency phasor-type solution, and at each interchange it can provide voltage, current and equivalent impedance under the system frequency. This is presented to the EMT simulator at the interface bus as a Norton equivalent which includes a dynamically

Conventional approach based on waveform distortion

The choice of the location of the interface bus is at first glance obvious: for an HVDC system it could be the filter bus, and for a FACTS device, it could be the terminals of the device. However, there may be other considerations which would lead to a different location. There are two different views to choose the interface location as discussed in [1], [2], [3], [4].

For the first hybrid described by Heffernan et al. [1], the intention was to model the ac and dc solutions separately. The point

Interaction protocol

Since the integration step sizes adopted in the EMT and TS simulators are very different, an interaction protocol is needed in order to coordinate the information exchange between the simulators. For convenience, the integration step of the TS simulator is a multiple of the one used in the EMT simulator and information exchanging takes place only at common periodic time points, for example every time step of the TS simulator, as illustrated in Fig. 1.

Hybrid simulation performance assessment

A new hybrid simulator with the interaction protocol proposed above has been successfully implemented on a real-time digital electromagnetic transients simulator, known as HYPERSIM [7] using the user code block (UCB) facility. The interface itself is implemented as a UCB which is in turn interfaced with an in-house TS simulator.

Hybrid simulators should be able to solve system transients covering a large bandwidth: from electromagnetic transients associated with the devices, to swing curves for

Conclusions

Hybrid simulation is significant step towards the realization of a powerful digital power system simulator, capable of efficient simulation of large size networks, while providing accurate representation of highly nonlinear components, such as FACTS devices and HVDC links. In this paper we have developed the interface between two distinctly different simulators: EMT simulator (for detailed modeling of nonlinear components) and TS simulator (for transient stability of very large networks). Key

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, and the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, PR China (RGC No: PolyU 5118/00E).

References (9)

  • M.D. Heffernan et al.

    Computation of ac–dc system disturbance. Part I and II and III

    IEEE Trans. PAS

    (November 1981)
  • J. Reeve et al.

    A new approach to dynamic analysis of ac networks incorporating detailed modeling of dc system. Part I and II

    IEEE Trans. PD

    (October 1988)
  • G.W.J. Anderson et al.

    A new hybrid algorithm for analysis of HDVC and FACTS systems

    Proc. EMPD’95

    (1995)
  • M. Sultan et al.

    Combined transient and dynamic analysis of HVDC and FACTS systems

    IEEE Trans. PD

    (October 1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (11)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text