Elsevier

Energy Policy

Volume 45, June 2012, Pages 243-251
Energy Policy

Opportunities and barriers for implementing CO2 capture ready designs: A case study of stakeholder perceptions in Guangdong, China

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.025Get rights and content

Abstract

China has been building at least 50 gigawatt (GW) of new coal-fired power plants every year since 2004. In the absence of CO2 capture ready (CCR) designs, a large fraction of new coal power plants built in the next decade could face ‘carbon lock-in’. Building on the existing engineering and economic literature on CO2 capture ready, the aim of this study is to understand the opportunities and challenges in implementing CCR in China. In early 2010, opinion-leaders perceptions towards implementing CCR in Guangdong with two empirical phases are presented: an online consultation of 31 respondents (out of a sample of 82), three face-to-face focus group discussions including 16 officials from five power plants and two oil companies in the Guangdong province. A majority of respondents in the online survey were engineers. The survey results are compared with an earlier study of stakeholders’ views on demonstrating CCS in China, conducted in April 2009 as part of the EU–UK–China Near Zero Emissions Coal initiative (NZEC) project.

Highlights

► Without national support, interests from project management and local government help deploy CCR. ► Space on-site and access to storage sites are two essential criteria. ► It is also necessary to investigate the local plant design conventions and regulations. ► Five potential barriers to implementing CCR are identified. ► Four potential drivers may accelerate the implementation of CCR.

Introduction

Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) could be an important technology to decarbonise the Chinese coal-dominated electricity sector (Liu and Gallagher, 2010). On average, approximately 1 gigawatt (GW) of new coal-fired power plants begins construction in China every week but there are no incentives to support the large scale deployment of CCS in China. CO2 capture ready (CCR) is a design concept to ease retrofitting fossil fuel plants1 to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) in their lifetime. Building new plants in CO2 capture ready design is crucial in terms of preventing new plants ‘carbon emission lock in’ in China. A research project which examined 74 coal-fired power plant sites in China (where total installed capacity at each site is equal or larger than 1 GW) found that only 19% of sites appear to have a high retrofitting potential (Li, 2011).

Globally, a number of studies have been conducted to investigate the engineering requirements and a working definition for carbon dioxide capture readiness (CCR)2 (IEA GHG (International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme), 2007, IChemE (Institute of Chemical Engineering), 2007, FCO (Foreign and Commonwealth Office), 2008, Lucquiaud and Gibbins, 2009), its political feasibility (SCCS (Scottish Center for Carbon Storage), 2008, Markusson and Haszeldine, 2009), techno-economic aspects (Bohm et al., 2006, Liang et al., 2009), planning issue (Li et al., 2011), and potential financing mechanisms (Liang et al., 2010). Studies have apparently not been undertaken, however, to explore key stakeholders’3 acceptance and perception of implementing CCR design in their new coal plants. This paper builds on the CO2 capture ready study by IEA GHG (2007) and a stakeholders’ consultation for the NZEC (EU–UK–China Near Zero Emissions Coal) project on the general perceptions of developing CCS demonstration projects in China (Reiner and Liang, 2009). The aim of this study is to understand the engineering, economic, and policy issues of implementing CO2 capture ready design concepts on new build coal-fired power plants immediately.

Guangdong is a pioneer of economic reform in China and one of the richest provinces. Guangdong contributes approximately 12% of the total national economic output with 7.8% of the total population in China and has a nominal GDP per capita of $7000 (OECD, 2010, SBGP (Statistics Bureau of Guangdong Province), 2011). Guangdong aims to gradually establish a green energy system with a short term goal of reducing the GDP carbon intensity by 19.5% from 2010 to 2015 (Central Government, 2012). From 2006 to 2010 Guangdong closed 12 GW of small and less efficient thermal power plants in response to the national policy of ‘replacing small thermal units by large units’. As of March 2010, 16 GW of ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plants with a unit capacity of 1000 MW were in the construction stage4 (SERC, 2010). These advanced, large power plants in construction and others in planning, in the absence of CCR design, may be subject to ‘carbon lock-in’ (i.e. it would be infeasible to retrofit the plants to capture CO2 in their lifetime) (Li, 2011). Therefore, a survey of plant managers and engineers from the energy industry in the Pearl River Delta in Guangdong was conducted, with the objective of understanding their perceptions on implementing CO2 capture readiness, in particular:

  • (a)

    Stakeholder willingness to implement CO2 capture ready designs in fossil fuel power plants;

  • (b)

    Identification of the key engineering factors cited by interviewees which potentially affect the implementation of CO2 capture ready designs;

  • (c)

    Understanding cost performance expectations and what potential incentives could trigger CO2 capture ready investment.

This is the first survey with a focus on CO2 capture ready issues in China and is designed to provide information on a range of aspects of CCR implementation that are of relevance to policy makers, power plant investors, and engineers. The format and methodology of the survey could form the basis for further work on this area in the run up to the possible introduction of CCR in other regions of China and other developing countries.

Section snippets

Data collection and sample selection

The format of the study builds on the stakeholder communication for the NZEC study which used an online survey and follow-up face-to-face interviews (Reiner and Liang, 2009). In this research, opinion leaders’ perception with regard to the acceptance of CCR was first collected from an online survey. In order better to understand issues which could potentially influence the implementation (Malone et al., 2010), subsequently three focus group discussions were undertaken.

In March 2010, two

General views on climate change and CCS technologies

There are almost equal numbers of optimistic and pessimistic responses on whether or not the current global climate policies can significantly reduce global carbon emissions in the next decade. An interesting finding from regression analysis was that stakeholders spending a greater percentage of their working time on climate change tended to believe that with current global climate policies it would be ‘difficult’ to reduce global carbon emissions.13

Discussion and conclusions

CCS is a well-established concept to decarbonise coal-fired electricity generation in China. A majority of respondents expressed interest in or were supportive of both CCS and CCR, especially those stakeholders spending more time on climate change. With respect to technology preferences, post-combustion technology was thought to be more likely to be used than pre-combustion IGCC or pre-combustion polygeneration in the first 10 projects in China. Most interviewees focused on the utilisation of CO

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge financial support from UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) through Chinese Advanced Power Plants Carbon Capture Options (CAPPCCO) and UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and Australia Global Carbon Capture and Storage Institute (GCCSI) through the Guangdong CCS Readiness Project. Special thanks are also due to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions. Appreciate Prof Di Zhou, Dr Feng Qiao and Ms Phyla Lin for supporting this study and coordinating

References (31)

  • FCO (Foreign and Commonwealth Office), 2008. Carbon Capture Ready Ultra Mega Power Plants, India. Retrieved:...
  • G8, 2005. Gleneagles Plan of Action, Gleneagles. Retrieved: 2010/Apr/08. Available at:...
  • GCCSI, 2010. Submission Energy Strategy Approach Paper, Appendix B. Retrieved 2010/Oct/12. Available at...
  • IChemE (Institute of Chemical Engineering), 2007. Capture Ready Study. Retrieved: 2010/Sep/23. Available at:...
  • IEA GHG (International Energy Agency Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme), 2007. CO2 Capture Ready Plants, Technical Study...
  • Cited by (17)

    • An integrated approach for assessing the urban ecosystem health of megacities in China

      2016, Cities
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nanjing, Shanghai, and Hangzhou, as typical cities in the Yangtze River Delta, have strictly controlled the emission of pollutants to compensate for the eco-environmental damage due to rapid industrialization and urbanization in recent years (Li et al., 2014; Zhang & Gangopadhyay, 2015). Guangzhou and Foshan are two representative cities in the Pearl River Delta that have seen significant economic development and globalization, along with “low-carbon and green development” (Li, Liang, Cockerill, Gibbins, & Reiner, 2012; Yang & Li, 2013). The remaining cities are located in the middle, western, or northern regions of China, which slightly lag behind the southeastern cities in terms of development.

    • Assessing relative importance and mutual influence of barriers for CCS deployment of the ROAD project using AHP and DEMATEL methods

      2015, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another aspect evidenced by the table was the methods used by the studies to rank the barriers. With exceptions of one work where the barriers were discussed during focus groups (Li et al., 2012), all the other studies used questionnaires to assess these barriers. And, in order to rank them, or they have used one type of Likert scale (e.g.: ranging from “no obstacle” to “critical obstacle”, Davies et al., 2013) or the rank was just based on the number of times the respondents selected the barrier from a list (Reiner and Liang, 2009b).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text