An experimental study of the bond behavior of twisted steel bars embedded in mortar cylinders and in the joints of masonry wallettes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125795Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Pull-out tests of steel bars inserted in mortar cylinders were conducted.

  • Pull-out tests of steel bars inserted in masonry wallettes were conducted.

  • Different bonded lengths were considered.

  • Bar rotation during extraction was observed.

Abstract

Among the different strengthening techniques available to reinforce masonry buildings, the near-surface mounted technique consists in inserting reinforcing elements of high-strength material in grooves realized by removing part of the mortar in the horizontal bed joints of a masonry wall. The present study deals with two experimental campaigns on pull-out tests conducted on twisted steel bars embedded concentrically in mortar cylinders and in the mortar bed joints of masonry wallettes as in in-situ applications. In order to compare the results between cylindrical and masonry specimens, the same bonded lengths are considered.

Introduction

The main structural deficiencies of masonry buildings are related to the almost-inexistent tensile strength, as the bond strength between mortar and fired-clay brick is very low, and the limited effectiveness of the connections between the masonry elements [1], [2]. Thus, masonry buildings are susceptible to seismic actions [3], as unfortunately highlighted in the recent Italian events of L’Aquila in 2009, Emilia Romagna in 2012, and Amatrice in 2016 [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. When fair-faced masonry buildings necessitate retrofitting, reinforced structural repointing may be a feasible solution since it does not violate the aesthetic requirements of a historical building since the reinforcement is embedded in the joints [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. The strengthening elements can be of different shapes and materials. Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) thin strips or bars made of carbon (CFRP), AR glass, or basalt fibers embedded in an organic matrix are typically used, although stainless steel bars have been studied as well and will be the focus of this paper. Structural repointing is also known as near-surface mounted (NSM) technique, since the reinforcing material is inserted into 10–20 mm-deep grooves usually carved in the mortar bed joints by means of a circular saw. The reinforcing elements are embedded in the joint grooves by means of an organic material such as epoxy (typically thermosetting), cementitious mortars modified with the addition of organic additives, or cementitious-based mortars or lime-based mortars. When possible, the reinforcing elements are applied on both sides of the wall, and in some cases, they are connected by ties placed transversely in the wall [14].

The use of repointing for masonry structures is fairly common. However, only few studies in the literature have focused on the bond performance of NSM reinforcement embedded in masonry [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. The most important contributions dealing with pull-out tests of structural repointing can be roughly divided into two main groups of researchers. In the United States, most studies investigated the bond performance of carbon or glass FRP bars embedded in the bed joints of masonry specimens made of concrete blocks [21], [22]. The variables that have been considered are the bonded length, bar diameter, groove size with respect to the bar diameter, embedding material (epoxy or latex modified cementitious mortar), as well as the bar surface condition. The second major group of studies have been conducted in Australia and New Zealand and dealt with pull-out tests of CFRP strips embedded with epoxy resin in masonry specimens made of solid fired-clay bricks [16], [23], [24], [25]. In these experimental campaigns, several parameters were taken into account: the strip bonded length, the direction (parallel or orthogonal) of the reinforcing elements with respect to the direction of the bed joints, the effect of cyclic loadings, as well as the size of the strips. It should be noted that in this group of experimental campaigns the NSM CFRP strips were inserted into grooves cut through the fired-clay bricks rather than placed where the mortar joints were located.

Starting from the available experimental results on pull-out tests, simple analytical models have been developed to predict the bond properties such as bond capacity, effective bond length, and shear stress-slip relationship for concrete or fired-clay brick masonry substrates that are useful to predict the performance of structures that are reinforced with NSM bars or strips [26], [27].

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, none of the aforementioned works are related to study the bond behavior of NSM steel bars embedded in the bed joints of fired-clay brick masonry, employing as groove-filling material an inorganic matrix such as a structural mortar. To fill this gap, the aim of this work is to present the results of two extensive experimental campaigns that focus on the bond behavior of spiral-shaped stainless-steel bars. In the first campaign, in order to get a preliminary insight on the bond behavior of these bars, a series of pull-out tests are conducted on steel bars concentrically embedded in cylinders made of the same structural mortar used to embed the bars in the masonry grooves. The bars made of ultra-high strength steel are characterized by a helical shape. Several bonded lengths are considered. In the second experimental campaign, the same type of bars is inserted with the same structural mortar in the horizontal bed joints of masonry wallettes in order to reproduce more closely the in-situ application. The same bonded lengths investigated in the first experimental campaign are considered in the second set of tests for comparison.

Section snippets

Materials: mortars and bricks

Two different types of mortar were employed to construct the specimens: 1) a mortar used for structural applications herein used to cast the cylinders of the first campaign and embed the bars inside the masonry specimens of the second campaign (hereinafter referred to as mortar_s), and 2) a low-strength mortar herein employed for the masonry joints in the second campaign (hereinafter referred to as mortar_j).

Mortar_s was a commercially-available ready-mix mortar, M15 class according to EN 998-2

Results of the pull-out tests for the cylindrical specimens

In this section, the results of 15 pull-out tests conducted on the cylindrical specimens are presented. Bars slipped out of the cylinders until the test was stopped because the maximum LVDT stroke was reached (Fig. 10), except for cylinders with LB = 700 mm for which bar rupture occurred. It should be noted that both top and bottom LVDTs were removed close to the attainment of their maximum stroke, and then the test was resumed until the machine stroke was close to its maximum. In Fig. 11a and

Results of the pull-out tests for the masonry specimens

Two main different failure modes were observed during the tests on the masonry wallettes and are reported in Fig. 13. In 8 tests, the mortar joint, where the bar was embedded, detached from the bricks as the bar was pulled out (Type A in Fig. 13), which resulted in the splitting of the masonry wallette. The detachment of the mortar_s from the bricks occurred at the actual interfacial surface between mortar and brick with no mortar left attached to the brick. For those 8 specimens, it was not

Comparison between cylindrical and masonry specimens

In Fig. 15a, the average pull-out load F¯m for both cylindrical and masonry specimens with the same bonded length is plotted versus the bonded length LB itself. It should be noted that the value of F¯m for masonry specimens were computed without considering the specimens that exhibited splitting as soon as the first peak load was attained. Removing those specimens from the calculation of the average was necessary to consider the trend of consistent wallettes with the same type of failure, Table

Conclusions

This paper presented an investigation on the pull-out behavior of high-strength twisted steel bars that are commonly employed as reinforcing material in structural repointing applications on masonry structures. Two experimental programs were conducted: in the first one, the bars were embedded concentrically in cylinders made of structural mortar, and in the second one the bars were inserted (using the same mortar the cylinders were made of) few centimetres from the outer surface of masonry

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The experimental work discussed in this paper was conducted at the University of Bologna. Technicians of the laboratory LISG (Laboratory of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering) are gratefully acknowledged for their help during the preparation of the specimens and the execution of the tests. The authors would like to express their appreciation to Kerakoll S.p.A. (Sassuolo, Italy) for providing the composite materials. Mr. M. Maragna is gratefully acknowledged for his support during the

References (37)

  • D. Dizhur et al.

    Pullout strength of NSM CFRP strips bonded to vintage clay brick masonry

    Eng. Struct.

    (2014)
  • T. Karmokar et al.

    Concrete cone failure of single cast-in anchors under tensile loading – a literature review

    Eng. Struct.

    (2021)
  • M. Wȩglorz

    Influence of headed anchor group layout on concrete failure in tension

    Procedia Eng.

    (2017)
  • F. Focacci et al.

    An indirect method to calibrate the interfacial cohesive material law for FRCM-concrete joints

    Mater. Des.

    (2017)
  • M. Corradi et al.

    A database of the structural behavior of masonry in shear

    Bull. Earthq. Eng.

    (2018)
  • E. Franzoni et al.

    Durability of steel FRCM-masonry joints: effect of water and salt crystallization

    Mater. Struct./Mater. Constr.

    (2017)
  • L. Sorrentino et al.

    Seismic behaviour of ordinary masonry buildings during the 2016 central Italy earthquakes

    Bull. Earthq. Eng.

    (2019)
  • G. Fiorentino et al.

    Damage patterns in the town of Amatrice after August 24th 2016 Central Italy earthquakes

    Bull. Earthq. Eng.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (3)

    View full text