Mammalian somatosensory mechanotransduction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.07.008Get rights and content

In the mammalian somatosensory system, mechanosensitive neurons mediate the senses of touch and pain. Among sensory modalities, mechanosensation has been the most elusive with regard to the identification of transduction molecules. One factor that has hindered the identification of transduction molecules is the diversity of neurons; physiological studies have revealed many subtypes of neurons, specialized to detect a variety of mechanical stimuli. Do different subtypes use the same transduction molecules that are modified by cellular context? Or, are there multiple mechanotransducers that specialize in sensing different mechanical stimuli? This review highlights recent progress in identifying and characterizing candidate molecular force transducers, as well as the development of new tools to characterize touch transduction at the molecular, cellular, and behavioral levels.

Introduction

The mammalian somatosensory system detects a wide variety of mechanical stimuli. It enables us to differentiate between noxious stimuli, such as a pinprick, and innocuous light touch, such as the brush of a feather. Such discrimination serves an important protective function. Tactile discomfort or pain warns us against harmful stimuli in the environment and evokes protective reflexes. But pain can also be a chronic, debilitating affliction that no longer serves a protective function [1, 2]. Current research in the field of mammalian somatosensory mechanotransduction is focused on several critical questions. What are the molecular force transducers that detect tactile stimuli? How is force sensitivity tuned? How do injury or disease alter mechanical sensitivity? Here we review current papers that address these key questions.

Section snippets

Diversity of mechanosensitive sensory neurons

We encounter many types of mechanical stimuli, such as texture, shape, vibration, or pressure. This variety of stimuli is matched by a diverse array of somatosensory neurons [3, 4]. Somatosensory neurons lie in the dorsal root and trigeminal ganglia, from which they extend sensory afferents, and are classified into three broad groups: C, Aβ, and Aδ fibers (Figure 1). C-fiber nociceptors are unmyelinated (small diameter), terminate as free-nerve endings in target tissues and respond to noxious

Candidate mechanotransduction molecules

Three classes of ion channels have been implicated in mammalian somatosensory mechanotransduction: Degenerin/Epithelial sodium channels (DEG/ENaC), Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) channels and two-pore potassium (KCNK) channels (Table 1). Genetic studies from C. elegans demonstrate a requirement for DEG/ENaC subunits and accessory proteins, such as the stomatin-domain containing MEC-2, in touch responses [11]. Mice lacking the mammalian DEG/ENaC homologs, acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC)

Mechanical hypersensitivity

Hypersensitivity to mechanical stimuli (hyperalgesia) often occurs after tissue damage caused by inflammation, injury, or disease. Both central and peripheral mechanisms contribute to altered mechanical pain thresholds [29] but here we will emphasize recent progress in understanding peripheral changes. Because K+ channels play key roles in regulating neuronal excitability, they are suited to be mediators of hyperalgesia. Indeed, altered expression of voltage gated K+ channels has been

Cutaneous non-neuronal mechanosensors

While Aβ fibers steal the limelight as primary mechanotransducers of light touch, they are closely associated with specialized structures, including Merkel cells, Pacinian corpuscles, Meissner corpuscles, and hair follicles [43]. Even ‘free’ nerve endings are embedded in keratinocytes. Thus, it is possible that these non-neuronal cells and corpuscles act as the primary mechanotransducers and that sensory afferents are activated through secreted signaling molecules. Definitive data for such a

New cellular-based assays to probe mechanotransduction in vitro

Thus far, it has not been possible to record mechanotransduction currents in intact mammalian sensory neurons in vivo. Thus, there is much interest in developing robust, in vitro assays that measure transduction currents with the same properties of the transduction apparatus in vivo. Traditionally, mechanotransduction has been studied in vitro by applying pressure to a patch pipette during electrophysiological recording, or by focal displacement of cell somata using glass probes (Figure 2d).

Conclusion

Among sensory modalities, mechanosensation has been the most elusive with regard to the identification of molecules that mediate stimulus transduction. This reflects the relative paucity and heterogeneity of mechanoreceptive cells and the lack of in vitro and in vivo systems for analyzing native mechanosensory responses. In the last few years there has been an increase in the number of candidate mechanotransduction channels. Pardoxically, transgenic mice lacking these candidates often display

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Kristin Gerhold for essential comments on the manuscript and helpful discussions. Work in the Bautista lab is supported by a Career Award in Biosciences from the Burroughs Welcome Fund and a fellowship from the Alfred P Sloan Foundation.

References (64)

  • M. Suzuki et al.

    Impaired pressure sensation in mice lacking TRPV4

    J Biol Chem

    (2003)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Marked attenuation of inflammatory mediator-induced C-fiber sensitization for mechanical and hypotonic stimuli in TRPV4−/− mice

    Mol Pain

    (2007)
  • P.S. Khalsa et al.

    Integrin alpha2beta1 affects mechano-transduction in slowly and rapidly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors in rat hairy skin

    Neuroscience

    (2004)
  • C. Schmidt et al.

    Mechanical stressing of integrin receptors induces enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of cytoskeletally anchored proteins

    J Biol Chem

    (1998)
  • U. Anand et al.

    TRPA1 receptor localisation in the human peripheral nervous system and functional studies in cultured human and rat sensory neurons

    Neurosci Lett

    (2008)
  • N. Alessandri-Haber et al.

    Hypotonicity induces TRPV4-mediated nociception in rat

    Neuron

    (2003)
  • S.R. Chaplan et al.

    Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw

    J Neurosci Methods

    (1994)
  • G.C. McCarter et al.

    Mechanical transduction by rat dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro

    Neurosci Lett

    (1999)
  • Z.Y. Wang et al.

    Lack of TRPV1 inhibits cystitis-induced increased mechanical sensitivity in mice

    Pain

    (2008)
  • F. Maingret et al.

    TRAAK is a mammalian neuronal mechano-gated K+ channel

    J Biol Chem

    (1999)
  • G. Hans et al.

    The diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain in daily practice in Belgium: an observational study

    BMC Public Health

    (2007)
  • J. Scadding et al.

    Neuropathic pain

    Curr Opin Neurobiol

    (2001)
  • G.R. Lewin et al.

    Mechanosensation and pain

    J Neurobiol

    (2004)
  • J.B. Shin et al.

    A T-type calcium channel required for normal function of a mammalian mechanoreceptor

    Nat Neurosci

    (2003)
  • M.J. Zylka et al.

    Atypical expansion in mice of the sensory neuron-specific Mrg G protein-coupled receptor family

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2003)
  • Q. Liu et al.

    Molecular genetic visualization of a rare subset of unmyelinated sensory neurons that may detect gentle touch

    Nat Neurosci

    (2007)
  • B. Abrahamsen et al.

    The cell and molecular basis of mechanical, cold, and inflammatory pain

    Science

    (2008)
  • M. Chalfie

    Neurosensory mechanotransduction

    Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol

    (2009)
  • C. Wetzel et al.

    A stomatin-domain protein essential for touch sensation in the mouse

    Nature

    (2007)
  • A.P. Christensen et al.

    TRP channels in mechanosensation: direct or indirect activation?

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2007)
  • S.E. Jordt et al.

    Mustard oils and cannabinoids excite sensory nerve fibres through the TRP channel ANKTM1

    Nature

    (2004)
  • K. Nagata et al.

    Nociceptor and hair cell transducer properties of TRPA1, a channel for pain and hearing

    J Neurosci

    (2005)
  • Cited by (75)

    • Acute pain management in dermatology Mechanisms and pathways

      2015, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Much has been uncovered about transducer function and their interactions, but translation of this knowledge into clinically relevant therapeutic tools is still a goal of future research. Although sensory transduction is primarily accomplished via neuronal afferents, recent evidence shows that nonneuronal cells express transducers.3 Keratinocytes and other epithelial cells have high transducer expression, providing a link between the skin and neuronal afferents in pain signaling.6

    • Piezo proteins: Regulators of mechanosensation and other cellular processes

      2014, Journal of Biological Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      In bacteria, the molecular identity of mechanosensitive ion channels has been understood at the molecular level for many years. However, until recently, the molecular identity of mechanosensory ion channels in higher organisms has been unknown (2). Piezo1 and Piezo2 proteins, encoded by the Piezo1/FAM38A and Piezo2/FAM38B genes, respectively, were recently identified as mechanically activated (MA) ion channels in the murine neuroblastoma cell line N2A in an siRNA screen (3, 4).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text