CD8+ T-cell memory: only the good ones last

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2004.05.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Generating long-lasting, protective CD8+ T-cell memory via vaccination is critical for combating infectious diseases. Advances in the past year have provided many new insights into how memory CD8+ T cells are generated. It is now recognized that CD8+ T cells differentiate from ‘effector memory’ cells into ‘central memory’ cells, which are stably maintained and confer superior protective immunity. Furthermore, CD4+ T-cell help plays an important role in guiding the differentiation of CD8+ T cells into long-lasting, functional memory. These findings have important implications for developing vaccine strategies that induce high-quality CD8+ T-cell memory, not just high quantity.

Introduction

CD8+ T cells are important for controlling threats to host survival that come from within, namely intracellularly replicating pathogens and cancerous growths. When a naı̈ve CD8+ T cell encounters a foreign antigen in the context of MHC class I (MHC-I), it divides and differentiates into many effector CD8+ T cells, which exert their immune function by direct cytolysis and secretion of cytokines, such as IFN-γ and TNF-α. This is followed by a programmed contraction that leaves a population of CD8+ memory T cells (TM), which stably persists after resolution of the infection. Upon a second encounter with their specific antigen, CD8+ TM rapidly divide, immediately exert effector functions and give rise to a large population of secondary effectors [1].

Memory — the ability of the immune system to respond with greater efficacy to a second insult by the same pathogen — has been recognized since antiquity and is a cardinal feature of the adaptive immune system. The ability to maintain this potential for an extended period of time is the hallmark of immunological memory and underpins the technology of vaccination. Our understanding of the molecular and cellular basis of immunological memory was first appreciated in B cells because the progressive changes in antibody production and maturation were the most accessible to analytical study. In recent years, however, technological advances have permitted a more detailed study of T-cell memory at the level of a single antigen-specific cell. This past year has been no exception. Here, we review the most significant contributions made to the study of CD8+ TM during the past year.

Section snippets

CD8+ memory T cell subsets

It has long been known that humoral immune memory consists of two distinct populations: long-lived antibody-secreting plasma cells and memory B cells, which serve as a reservoir for the rapid generation of plasma cells [2]. The memory population of cellular immune cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, may also be subdivided into two populations: effector memory T cells (TEM) and central memory T cells (TCM). These subsets were first described for CD4+ T cells on the basis of surface molecule

CD4+ T-cell help for CD8+ memory T-cell differentiation

CD4+ helper T cells (TH) provide help for the CD8+ T-cell response to non-inflammatory antigens through the activation of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). However, the primary CD8+ T-cell response to most infectious agents is independent of CD4+ TH. This is thought to result from the direct activation of APCs by infectious agents through Toll-like receptors and inflammatory signals that bypass the requirement for CD4+ TH. It has also been shown that the secondary CD8+ T-cell response to viral

Delivery of CD4+ T-cell help for memory CD8+ T-cell differentiation

CD4+ TH are delivered to B cells through direct CD40–CD40 ligand (CD40L) signaling between the B cells and CD4+ T cells [20]. CD4+ T-cell help for the primary CD8+ T-cell response has been shown to involve CD40–CD40L interactions between APCs and CD4+ T cells, leading to the APC activation required for the priming of naı̈ve CD8+ T cells 21., 22., 23.. More recently, Bourgeois et al. [13] suggested a new mechanism of CD4+ T-cell help for the CD8+ T-cell response that involves a direct CD40–CD40L

Conclusions

Advances in the past year have dramatically changed the way we think about the generation of CD8+ TM. First, it has been shown that TEM convert into TCM and not vice versa, and, moreover, TCM have a greater potential than TEM for long-term stability and functional protection. Second, it has been demonstrated that CD4+ TH are necessary during priming for the generation of stable and functional CD8+ TM, suggesting that CD4+ TH might play a role in the differentiation of TCM. It remains to be

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • of special interest

  • ••

    of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Lauren Zenewicz for a critical reading of the manuscript.

References (28)

  • M.G von Herrath et al.

    CD4-deficient mice have reduced levels of memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes after immunization and show diminished resistance to subsequent virus challenge

    J Virol

    (1996)
  • J.M Riberdy et al.

    Diminished primary and secondary influenza virus-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses in CD4-depleted Ig(−/−) mice

    J Virol

    (2000)
  • D.J Shedlock et al.

    Role of CD4 T cell help and costimulation in CD8 T cell responses during Listeria monocytogenes infection

    J Immunol

    (2003)
  • C Bourgeois et al.

    A role for CD40 expression on CD8+ T cells in the generation of CD8+ T cell memory

    Science

    (2002)
  • Cited by (46)

    • CD8 T Cell Memory to Pathogens

      2016, Encyclopedia of Immunobiology
    • Tight Regulation of Memory CD8<sup>+</sup> T Cells Limits Their Effectiveness during Sustained High Viral Load

      2011, Immunity
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, we next wanted to find a way to overcome the increased regulation of these cells and enhance memory cell persistence during chronic infection. Because CD4+ T cell help has been shown to be important for CD8+ T cell function during viral infections (Harty and Badovinac, 2008; Northrop and Shen, 2004; Wherry, 2011; Williams et al., 2006), we investigated whether increased LCMV-specific CD4+ T cell help could rescue the transferred memory cells during chronic infection. To answer this question, we cotransferred LCMV GP61 epitope-specific CD4+ T cells (Smarta) at the time of naive and memory CD8+ T cell cotransfer into normal CD4+ intact B6 mice.

    • Immunology of Vaccines: Consideration of the Neonate as a Target for Vaccination

      2009, Vaccines for Biodefense and Emerging and Neglected Diseases
    • Immunology of Vaccines: Consideration of the Neonate as a Target for Vaccination

      2008, Vaccines for Biodefense and Emerging and Neglected Diseases
    • Heterogeneity and Cell-Fate Decisions in Effector and Memory CD8<sup>+</sup> T Cell Differentiation during Viral Infection

      2007, Immunity
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although we are far from a complete understanding of these pathways, a substantial body of work has outlined some key factors, including (1) the role of CD4+ T cell help , (2) common gamma-chain cytokines, and (3) the strength of antigenic and inflammatory signals during T cell priming. CD4+ T cells, CD40-CD40L signals, and IL-2 help to maximize effector CD8+ T cell expansion, an effective E → M transition, and long-term maintenance after acute viral infections (Northrop and Shen, 2004; Rocha and Tanchot, 2004; Williams and Bevan, 2007). The result of defective CD4+ T cell help is the generation of a population of antiviral CD8+ T cells that largely resembles TEM cells, responds poorly to rechallenge, and in some cases expresses the death receptor, Trail (Badovinac et al., 2006; Janssen et al., 2005).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text