Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 1058, Issues 1–2, 5 October 2005, Pages 161-166
Brain Research

Research Report
Chronic administration of olmesartan attenuates the exaggerated pressor response to glutamate in the rostral ventrolateral medulla of SHR

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.07.070Get rights and content

Abstract

It has been shown that the pressor responses to microinjection of l-glutamate in the rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) are augmented in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), and that these augmented responses are not altered by chronic conventional antihypertensive treatment. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of chronic oral treatment with a new angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, RNH-6270 (the active form of olmesartan medoxomil), on cardiovascular responses to excitatory amino acids in the RVLM of SHR. SHR (12 weeks old) were treated with RNH-6270 (30 mg/kg/day) or vehicle for 4 weeks. At 16 weeks of age, l-glutamate (2 nmol), N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA; an ionotropic glutamate receptor agonist (20 pmol)), or (1S,3R)-1-aminocyclopentane-1,3-dicarboxylic acid ((1S,3R)-ACPD; a metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist (1 nmol)) was microinjected into the RVLM of rats. The pressor responses to microinjection of l-glutamate or NMDA in the RNH-6270-treated SHR (+28.3 ± 1.0 and +48.3 ± 2.5 mm Hg, respectively) were significantly smaller than those in untreated SHR (+45.7 ± 2.2 and +69.4 ± 7.0 mm Hg, respectively, P < 0.05 each); however, they were still greater than those in the Wistar–Kyoto rats (+21.7 ± 1.0 and +28.6 ± 3.3 mm Hg, respectively, P < 0.05 each). In contrast, the augmented pressor responses to microinjection of (1S,3R)-ACPD in SHR were not affected by the RNH-6270 treatment. These results demonstrated that chronic oral treatment with RNH-6270, an AT1 receptor antagonist, partly normalizes the pressor responses to l-glutamate or NMDA, but not (1S,3R)-ACPD, in the RVLM of SHR, suggesting that endogenous angiotensin II may be involved in the exaggerated pressor response to l-glutamate, probably through its ionotropic glutamate receptors.

Introduction

Angiotensin II (Ang II) acts not only on vascular smooth muscle and the adrenal cortex but also within the heart, kidneys, and central and autonomic nervous systems [4], [12]. The antihypertensive effects of blocking the renin–angiotensin system have been primarily attributable to the peripheral blockade of this system [4]; however, the contributions of the central nervous system to the antihypertensive effects of renin–angiotensin system blockade have not been adequately studied. Furthermore, the effects of chronic oral treatment with an Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist on the brain renin–angiotensin system and central cardiovascular modulation have not yet been established [19].

The rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM) is one of the brain regions which plays an important role in sympathetic and cardiovascular regulation in the central nervous system [14], [20]. Glutamate is the primary neurotransmitter involved in the cardiovascular regulation and the baroreceptor reflex in the RVLM [14]. It activates the ligand-gated cationic channels N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA), as well as kainate receptors [8]. However, glutamate also acts through a separate class of receptors, termed metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), that link to G-protein and intracellular calcium mobilization [15], [17]. On the other hand, it has been shown that cardiovascular responses to glutamate are exaggerated in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) compared to Wistar–Kyoto (WKY) rats, and cannot be normalized by chronic oral antihypertensive treatment with enalapril, an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor [22], [23]. However, the effects of chronic oral treatment with AT1 receptor antagonists on the exaggerated pressor response to glutamate and the glutamate subreceptor agonist have not yet been investigated.

AT1 receptors are expressed in the RVLM [5], [13], and Ang II has been shown to act at the AT1 receptors in RVLM to activate the sympathetic nervous system and to increase arterial pressure [1], suggesting that AT1 receptors in RVLM are involved in cardiovascular regulation in the central nervous system. We hypothesized that chronic oral treatment with an AT1 receptor antagonist may block the AT1 receptors in the RVLM, resulting in normalization of the exaggerated pressor response to the microinjection of glutamate or glutamate subreceptor agonist into the RVLM in SHR, because the brain renin–angiotensin system is activated to a higher degree in SHR compared to WKY rats [9], and because AT1 receptor antagonists are considered to be more effective at blocking the renin–angiotensin system than angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors [4]. Accordingly, the present study was designed to determine the effects of chronic treatment with RNH-6270 (the active form of olmesartan medoxomil), an AT1 receptor antagonist, for 4 weeks, on cardiovascular responses to microinjection of l-glutamate, NMDA, or an mGluR agonist into the RVLM in SHR. In addition, in order to confirm that chronic oral treatment with the AT1 receptor antagonist blocked the AT1 receptors in the brain, Ang II was also microinjected into the RVLM in the RNH-6270-treated SHR.

Section snippets

Preparation of animals

All experiments were performed using adult male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR/Izm; 12 weeks old) and age-matched Wistar–Kyoto rats (WKY/Izm) according to the institutional guidelines for animal experimentation at Kyushu University. SHR were treated with RNH-6270 (the active form of olmesartan medoxomil), an AT1 receptor antagonist, for 4 weeks (30 mg/kg/day in drinking water, n = 7). Another group of SHR (n = 7) and WKY (n = 7) did not receive any medications throughout the experimental

Effects of treatment with RNH-6270 on blood pressure and heart rate

Fig. 1 shows the serial changes in systolic blood pressure and heart rate (HR) during the treatment period. Systolic blood pressure before treatment was significantly increased in SHR compared to that of WKY rats. Systolic blood pressure in SHR treated with chronic oral administration of RNH-6270 was significantly decreased to a level comparable to that in WKY rats. In contrast, the changes in HR did not differ among the three groups.

Cardiovascular effects of l-glutamate in the RVLM

Baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) and HR in anesthetized

Discussion

The present study demonstrated that chronic oral treatment with RNH-6270, an AT1 receptor antagonist, effectively blocked the AT1 receptors in the RVLM, and that it partly normalized the exaggerated pressor responses to the microinjection of l-glutamate or NMDA into the RVLM in SHR. In contrast, the pressor response induced by microinjection of (1S,3R)-ACPD, an mGluR agonist, into the RVLM could not be changed by the treatment with RNH-6270. These findings suggest that chronic treatment with

References (23)

  • M. de Gasparo et al.

    International union of pharmacology: XXIII. The angiotensin II receptors

    Pharmacol. Rev.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Sex differences in NMDA GluN1 plasticity in rostral ventrolateral medulla neurons containing corticotropin-releasing factor type 1 receptor following slow-pressor angiotensin II hypertension

      2015, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      The increase in the relative distribution of GluN1 on the PM of CRF1 expressing distal dendritic profiles contacted by glutamate inputs would suggest a hypertension-associated potentiation of NMDA receptor signaling in corticotropin-sensitive RVLM neurons. This would be consistent with previous studies demonstrating the involvement of NMDA receptors in the RVLM in pressor responses in spontaneously hypertensive rats (Lin et al., 1995, 2005; Zhang and Abdel-Rahman, 2002). The RVLM is a critical regulator of the baroreflex arc by interfacing between first and second order mechanoreceptive inputs from the nucleus tractus solitarius and caudal ventrolateral medulla (Wehrwein and Joyner, 2013) and outputs to the spinal cord.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text