Elsevier

Applied Catalysis B: Environmental

Volume 217, 15 November 2017, Pages 494-522
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental

Review
Recent progress for direct synthesis of dimethyl ether from syngas on the heterogeneous bifunctional hybrid catalysts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.085Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Dimethyl ether (DME) is a multi-purpose alternative synthetic fuel for diesel and liquefied petroleum gas.

  • Recent direct DME synthesis from syngas was overviewed over hybridized bifunctional catalysts.

  • Surface acidity and metallic sites for CO or CO2 hydrogenation to DME are crucial factors.

Abstract

The recent rising demand of renewable energies and climate changes has been driving intensive academic researches into new chemical routes to sustainable and clean fuel productions in order to meet the demands of industrial evolution by solving energy crisis due to limited fossil fuel reservoirs and increasing environmental pollutants. Dimethyl ether (DME) is a multi-purpose synthetic fuel and chemical that can be used as an excellent alternative to diesel fuel and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). The present review paper briefly provides an overview of the recent developments for a direct synthesis of DME from synthesis gas (syngas, CO + H2) over some hybridized bifunctional heterogeneous catalysts composed of copper-based hydrogenation catalysts with solid acid components such as alumina or zeolites mainly, where the catalytic activities significantly depend on its properties influenced by synthesis protocols, porosities, surface areas, interactions of active metals with supports, distributions of metal particles on the supports and so on. We have also briefly covered the hydrogenation of CO2, a model reaction for the utilization of CO2 containing in syngas, to produce DME and thereby significantly mitigate its environmental impacts. Furthermore, the catalytic performances of the direct synthesis of DME by hydrogenation of carbon oxides were explained in terms of the acid sites of the solid acid catalysts and surface area of metallic copper nanoparticles in the hybridized bifunctional catalysts with their preparation protocols.

Introduction

The energy utilization cycle generally consists of three stages such as an energy generation, distribution and consumption, all of which must be closely balanced for an ideal energy infrastructure [1]. Meanwhile, the world energy consumption is steadily increasing, and thus rapidly depleting energy resources owing to an industrial evolution by generating significant environmental pollutants from an increasing population and globalization [2]. The conventional fossil resources such as crude oil, coal and natural (or shale) gases are the major sources of world’s primary energies (Fig. 1a) that are used mostly as fuels (Fig. 1b) [3]. However, when fossil fuels are burnt they predominantly produce CO2 that has been identified as a major source contributing to climate changes. Besides they generate other harmful gases such as SOx and NOx which need to be removed to meet the environmentally acceptable fuel requirements. To limit these unwanted harmful gas increases, some supplements of fossil fuels are prerequisite for a sustainable society [1], [4]. Furthermore, the present use of natural resources does not secure the ability of future generations to meet their own energy needs. Although the exploitation of unconventional fossil fuel resources such as shale oil and shale gas could significantly increase the availability of affordable fossil fuels, the impacts of their production on the environment are also raising numerous concerns [5]. The utilization of these fossil and unconventional resources also impair the problems associated with the greenhouse gas emissions (especially, CO2) and thus it is vital for mankind to find renewable, sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative chemicals for heat, power and transportation and so on.

A great deal of researches has been conducted to meet the rising demands for energy and to mitigate CO2 emission by developing more sustainable technologies that use the available raw materials like coal, natural gas and biomass [4], [6]. Synthesis gas (syngas, mainly CO + H2 mixtures), the raw materials for clean fuels and platform chemicals, can be produced from coal, natural gas, biomass and other waste resources. Although, for economic reasons, syngas is now exclusively produced from natural gas and coal, it could be made from any carbon containing feedstock including biomass. Biomass, CO2 neutral resource, extensively distributed in the world and it is considered as one of the alternative feedstock for the production of fuels and chemicals [7], [8].

Two main chemical transformation routes were reported in the literatures for the conversion of syngas into fuels. (1) The production of linear aliphatic hydrocarbons including methane by methanation has been well known by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) reaction which can be catalyzed by the supported transition metals such as Ru, Fe and Co. (2) Syngas to methanol which gives dimethyl ether (DME) by dehydration. Both the above routes have been successfully implemented in industry for the production of synthetic fuels [9]. However the former method should require CO2-free syngas, whereas methanol/DME synthesis route can be conducted in the presence of CO2-rich syngas and thus it has been considered as a promising method to get synthetic clean fuels and to mitigate CO2 emission. Both methanol and DME can be used as synthetic fuels. Nevertheless, DME provides a high H/C ratio with relatively harmless. Therefore, DME is more preferable and often plays an alternative role to methanol [10]. DME, also called as methoxymethane (CH3OCH3), the smallest aliphatic ether, is a non-toxic, non-carcinogenic and non-corrosive compound. DME can be used as an excellent alternative to diesel fuel due to its high cetane number (55–60) and a low emission of CO, NOx in the exhaust gases from a diesel engine as it has no Csingle bondC bond structures. It also has similar physical properties as that of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and hence can be used as an alternative fuel for cooking and heating [11a]. Furthermore, the well-developed infrastructures of LPG can be adapted for DME and this makes DME outstanding for practical uses [10]. As multisource, multi-purpose clean fuels, it is also projected as a chemical feedstock of the 21st century for the production of hydrocarbon, oxygenates and higher ethers [7]. For instance, there is a huge market value for acetic acid, gasoline and olefins which can be possibly derived from DME (Fig. 2). Since DME having a high H/C ratio and intense energy density, it can be used for hydrogen and dimethoxyethane (DMET) production by steam reforming (or partial oxidation) and steam plasma, respectively [11]. DME is an excellent solvent and also degrades rubber materials [12]. It has also been increasingly used as an aerosol propellant to replace conventional chlorofluorocarbons which are found to destroy ozone layers of the atmosphere [13]. The DME aerosol propellant has been used in a wide range of personal care products including shaving creams, hairspray, foams, and antiperspirants because of its higher water solubility relative to other propellants. Besides, DME has been used in a limited amount to freeze meat and fish by direct immersion [12].

DME was firstly appeared in 1867 as an anesthetic agent that tested in rabbits and pigeons [12]. In 1963, Akzo Nobel Corporation firstly used DME as an aerosol propellant. In 1970s, oil prices were increased, and significant efforts have been made to produce cleaner diesel fuels and other alternative fuels [14]. From the late 1970s, a global oil company called Amoco has started work on the production of liquid fuels from syngas. Majunke and Mueller filed a German patent in 1984 where they pointed out “methanol based fuel consisting of DME” [15]. Following this patent, a US patent published on “method of operating a diesel engine with a fuel consisting of >95% DME” in 1990 [16]. In the late 1990s, Amoco jointly collaborated with the General Electric Co. (GE) and the Electric Power Development Corporation (EPDC) of Japan tried DME as a “gas turbine fuel”. DME production was efficiently performed in this test and it showed low emissions of particulate matter as well [12]. As shown in Fig. 3, the history of DME production and its established milestones was summarized into early and developing stages from 1963 to 1990 and active stage after 1990s. In the subsequent years, several publications on DME synthesis were reported using single-step method over homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis (Fig. 4). Similarly, a lot of citations on DME synthesis are exponentially increasing every year as summarized in Fig. 4.

This topic was first reviewed in 2006 by Semelsberger et al. [18] on the viability of DME as an alternative fuel. Two reviews (2008 and 2014) were described the potential usage of DME in compression-ignition engines [19]. Yoon and Han pronounced some technological and economic aspects of DME production and its future uses [20]. In 2010, two short-reviews were published on catalyst development for the production of DME [7], [21]. Fleisch et al.[22] described the history and status of DME as an alternative fuel. Recently, Bhattacharya et al. [23] reviewed on the current and potential future applications of Victorian brown coal for DME synthesis. Very recently, two reviews were summarized in 2014 on the catalysts and reactors used for the production of DME [24], [25]. Among them, the last two review papers were covered the technologies in reactor design and randomly chosen hybrid/bifunctional catalysts for syngas to DME synthesis [24], [25] that are inadequate in a catalysis point of view, while others just mention DME as potential alternative fuel [18], [22], but this area has been progressing very fast, and over 200 articles have been published in scientific journals from 2006 to 2016 (Fig. 4). In this review paper, we try to provide an overview of the recent developments in the direct synthesis of DME from syngas (CO (or CO2) + H2) over typical heterogeneous hybrid/bifunctional catalysts, where syngas to DME performance was well correlated with the acid sites of the solid-acid catalysts as well as the metal particle surface areas in the hybridized bifunctional catalysts.

Section snippets

Methods for synthesis of DME

DME synthesis can be categorized into a single-step process and two-step process. The former and the latter are named as the direct synthesis and the indirect synthesis, respectively [26]. In the conventional indirect synthesis, methanol is synthesized from syngas (Eq. (1)) on a metallic copper-based heterogeneous catalyst (mainly, Cu/ZnO/Al2O3) in the first step through CO hydrogenation, which is limited thermodynamically, especially at high reaction temperatures [27]. In the second step,

Syngas-To-DME (STD) synthesis over hybrid/bifunctional catalysts

Carbon oxides are relatively inert molecules and their chemical transformations to other ones are energetically unfavorable. However, those reactions that yield stable molecules like DME can be viable under suitable reaction conditions. Hydrogenation of CO and/or CO2 is one of the best examples of such feasible conversions. Furthermore, when the methanol/DME production processes are considered, CO reactant is much more favorable to be converted and thus industrial hydrogenations normally use CO

Miscellaneous hybrid catalysts used for STD process

Research efforts have also been made on other hybridized bifunctional catalysts by choosing different combination of Cu-based MSC and MDC for the STD process. For example, a series of Cu–Mn–Zn/zeolite-Y prepared [73], [110], [159], [160] and found an improved CO conversion and DME selectivity when the acidity of HY zeolite was modified via ion-exchange with rare earth [73] and transition [110] metals (Table 9). However, it is also important to mention that Cu–Mn spinel oxide with higher

DME production from CO2/H2 mixtures over hybrid/bifunctional catalysts

Syngas-based production of methanol and subsequently DME formation inevitably generates certain amounts of CO2 according to the Eq. (4) [172]. Furthermore, DME and all carbon-containing fuels upon their combustion generally form the chemically stable CO2 product. Chemical recycling of CO2 to the renewable fuels and value-added chemicals offers an influential alternative to tackle both global climate change and fossil fuel depletion. However, the use of CO2 as chemical feedstock is limited due

Conclusions and outlook

DME, the smallest aliphatic ether with no Csingle bondC bond structure, can be used as an excellent alternative to diesel fuel, LPG and methanol fuels. DME can be synthesized either by a single-step (direct synthesis) or the two-step (indirect synthesis) methods from syngas. In the indirect synthesis method, methanol is synthesized from syngas on a metallic copper-based catalyst in the first step, limited by the thermodynamics, followed by methanol dehydration by solid acidic catalysts such as γ-alumina

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (NRF-2016M3D3A1A01913253). The work was also supported by the National Research Council of Science and Technology (NST) through Degree and Research Center (DRC) Program (2016).

References (212)

  • J. Kopyscinski et al.

    Fuel

    (2010)
  • R.M. Lopez

    PhD Thesis

    (2014)
  • P.S.S. Prasad et al.

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2008)
    Y. Wang et al.

    Tech

    (2005)
  • H.J. Majunke, H. Mueller. German Pat. DE 3,307,091,...
  • I.E. Levine. US Pat. 4,892,561,...
  • E.S. Yoon et al.

    Comput.-Aided Chem. Eng.

    (2009)
  • G. Xiangbo

    China Petrol. Proc. Petrochem. Technol.

    (2010)
  • T.H. Fleisch et al.

    J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.

    (2012)
  • S. Bhattacharya et al.

    Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.

    (2013)
  • Z. Azizi et al.

    Chem. Eng. Process.

    (2014)
  • J.W. Jeong et al.

    Catal. Lett.

    (2013)
  • I. Wender

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (1996)
    M.H. Huang et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2015)
    E.F. Sousa-Aguiar et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2005)
  • A.T. Aguayo et al.

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2007)
    Q. Ge et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (1998)
    Z. Wang et al.

    Chem. Eng. Technol.

    (2001)
  • G.X. Qi et al.

    Catal. Lett.

    (2001)
  • W.H. Chen et al.

    Appl. Energy

    (2012)
  • S. Lee

    Methanol Synthesis Technology

    (1990)
  • H. Pines et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1960)
  • A.C. Sofianos et al.

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (1991)
    M. Xu et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (1997)
  • M. Niwa et al.
    (2010)
  • M. Gentzen et al.

    Catal. Sci. Technol.

    (2016)
    A. García-Trenco et al.

    Catal. Sci. Technol.

    (2016)
  • M. Stiefel et al.

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2011)
  • G.-xin Jia et al.

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2005)
  • S. Papari et al.

    J. Nat. Gas Chem.

    (2012)
  • F. Hayer et al.

    Chem. Eng. Process.

    (2013)
  • H.J. Kim et al.

    Korean J. Chem. Eng.

    (2001)
  • H.W. Ham et al.

    Reac. Kinet. Mech. Cat.

    (2015)
  • J. Abu-Dahrieh et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2012)
  • H. Jung et al.

    Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.

    (2015)
  • S.P. Naik et al.

    Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.

    (2008)
  • E.J. Kim et al.

    Process Saf. Environ. Prot.

    (2006)
  • G.R. Moradi et al.

    React. Kinet. Catal. Lett.

    (2007)
  • R. Ahmad et al.

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2014)
  • D. Jin et al.

    Fuel

    (2007)
  • T. Takeguchi et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2000)
  • S.H. Lima et al.

    Appl. Catal. A

    (2014)
  • D. Mao et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (2006)
  • O.S. Joo et al.

    Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.

    (2002)
  • M.V. Twigg et al.

    Top. Catal.

    (2003)
  • M. Kurtz et al.

    Catal. Lett.

    (2004)
  • A. Venugopal et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (2009)
  • F. Song et al.

    Fuel Process. Technol.

    (2014)
  • Y. Tan et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2005)
  • J. Palgunadi et al.

    Reac. Kinet. Mech. Cat.

    (2010)
  • Q. Zhang et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2010)
  • S.C. Baek et al.

    Energy Fuels

    (2011)
  • D. Astruc et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2005)
  • N.J. Brown et al.

    ACS Catal.

    (2015)
  • Z. Gao et al.

    Catal. Lett.

    (2005)
    Z. Gao et al.

    Catal. Lett.

    (2009)
  • C. Ahn et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2016)
  • C. Ahn et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (177)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text