Elsevier

Antiviral Research

Volume 80, Issue 2, November 2008, Pages 200-205
Antiviral Research

Adamantane resistance in influenza A(H1) viruses increased in 2007 in South East Asia but decreased in Australia and some other countries

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2008.06.008Get rights and content

Abstract

The adamantanes (amantadine and rimantadine) were the initial antivirals licensed for use against influenza A viruses and have been used in some countries to control seasonal influenza and have also been stockpiled for potential pandemic use. While high rates of resistance have been observed in recent years with A(H3) viruses, the rates of resistance with A(H1) viruses has varied widely. In this study we analysed 281 human influenza A viruses isolated in 2007 that were referred to the WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research in Melbourne, mainly from Australia and the surrounding regions, for evidence of resistance to adamantanes and a subset of these was examined for resistance to the neuraminidase inhibitors (NIs). We found that the rates of adamantane resistance in A(H3) viruses continued to increase in most countries in 2007 but a distinct variation was seen with A(H1) resistance levels. A(H1) viruses from Australia, New Zealand and Europe had low rates of resistance (2–9%) whereas viruses from a number of South East (SE) Asian countries had high rates of resistance (33–100%). This difference can be attributed to the spread of A/Brisbane/59/2007-like viruses to many parts of the world with the exception of SE Asia where A/Hong Kong/2652/2006-like viruses continue to predominate. When these two A(H1) subgroups were compared for their in vitro sensitivity to the other class of influenza antiviral drugs, the neuraminidase inhibitors, no difference was seen between the groups with both showing normal levels of sensitivity to these drugs, The finding of reducing A(H1) resistance rates in Australia and rising levels in SE Asia in 2007, reverses the trend seen in 2006 when A(H1) resistance levels were rising in Australia and elsewhere but remained low in most of SE Asia.

Introduction

Since the mid-2000s the level of resistance to the adamantanes, a class of antivirals active against influenza A viruses, has been increasing for both the A(H3N2) and A(H1N1) influenza viruses in most countries. This has been especially evident for the A(H3) viruses which have reached almost 100% resistance in several countries (Bright et al., 2005, Deyde et al., 2007, Barr et al., 2007) and resistance in A(H1) viruses has also been rising in recent years (Bright et al., 2006, Deyde et al., 2007, Barr et al., 2007). This class of drugs, which includes the licensed products amantadine (Symmetrel™) and rimantadine (Flumadine™), has been widely used in many countries to combat seasonal influenza and in some countries has been stockpiled by for use in future pandemics (Aoki, 1998, Tsiodras et al., 2007). Due to the persistence of high rates of adamantane-resistant viruses, the use of the newer group of influenza antivirals known as neuraminidase inhibitors (NIs) (Reece, 2007), oseltamivir (Tamiflu™) and zanamivir (Relenza™), was recommended for the treatment or prevention of influenza for the last two influenza seasons by the US CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) (CDC, 2006, Fiore et al., 2007). Recently however there has been an increase in the proportion of A(H1N1) viruses with resistance to oseltamivir found in Europe, North America, Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, and especially in Norway where resistance was reported to be as high as 66% (155/234 viruses tested) of the 2007–2008 A(H1) viruses (last quarter 2007–April 4 2008, WHO, 2008a). There have also been reports of increased levels of resistance to zanamivir in circulating viruses in Australia and South East Asia (Hurt and Barr, 2007).

With the increasing levels of resistance to both licensed NI it is important to monitor the rates of resistance to the adamantanes in both circulating seasonal and potentially pandemic strains of influenza. The adamantanes work by blocking the ion channel formed by the M2 protein of influenza A viruses and inhibiting the early stages of virus replication (Hay, 1992, Pinto et al., 1992, Aoki, 1998). The mechanism of resistance is well understood and revolves around mutations in the M2 protein that lead to the loss of binding or action of these drugs (Hay et al., 1985, Aoki, 1998,). Several amino acid substitutions (at positions 26, 27, 30, 31 and 34) in the M2 protein and prevent binding of the adamantanes or change the structure of the ion channel to allow it to operate even in the presence of bound drug, with both types of change resulting in the generation of resistant viruses (Hay et al., 1986, Astrahan et al., 2004). This occurs when patients with influenza are treated with these drugs where there is a rapid generation of adamantane-resistant viruses and these resistant viruses are fully capable of transmission to other humans (Shiraishi et al., 2003). Abed et al. (2005) used reverse genetics to generate recombinant influenza A A(H1N1) viruses with the commonly observed adamantane resistance mutations in the M2 gene (L26F, V27A, A30T, S31N, G34E, and V27A/S31N). They showed not only did all of these mutations cause amantadine resistance but also the M2 mutants had no impairment in their replicative capacities in vitro and were at least as virulent as the wild-type virus in experimentally infected mice.

The recent proliferation of adamantane-resistant A(H3) viruses appears to have occurred by a chance reassortant event between influenza A(H3) viruses, which has made these viruses fully fit, possibly even more fit than other circulating A(H3) viruses, resulting in their current predominance (Simonsen et al., 2007). It is unclear at this stage what events have occurred to increase the A(H1) resistance levels although recombination with adamantane-resistant A(H3) viruses or increased use of the drug appear unlikely causes. Resistance among A(H1) viruses has generally not increased as quickly as it has among A(H3) viruses, with only a few regions having high levels of resistance in 2006 (e.g. Taiwan, Province of China with 82% (9/11) resistant strains) and most having low levels of resistance. For example in Malaysia and the Philippines in 2006, no A(H1) adamantane-resistant viruses were detected among 26 viruses tested. In Australia levels of resistance in A(H1) viruses grew from 0% in 2005 to 40% in 2006 (Barr et al., 2006a, Barr et al., 2007) compared to the global levels of 4.1% in 2004–2005 rising to 15.5% in 2005–2006 (Deyde et al., 2007). In the present study we examined influenza A viruses isolated in 2007 from patients with influenza in Africa, Australia, France, New Zealand, South East Asia, Macau (SAR of China), Pacific Islands and Taiwan (Province of China) and compared these results to adamantane resistance levels seen in these regions in previous years.

Section snippets

Viruses

Influenza A(H3) and A(H1) viruses were received from WHO National Influenza Centres, WHO Influenza Collaborating Centres and other regional laboratories and hospitals from Australia, New Zealand, and the Asia/Pacific region. Viruses were received as isolates passaged in cell culture (MDCK cells) or as original clinical samples in which influenza A had been detected by immunofluorescence or by RT-PCR. Once received at the Centre, the isolates were cultured in MDCK cells and monitored for growth

Results

An increased proportion (34.2%) of influenza A(H1) viruses (from the total number of influenza A(H1), A(H3) and B viruses) was received at the WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Melbourne in 2007 compared to recent years (2006 16.8%; 2005 12.8%; 2004 8.4%; 2003 0.9%). This increase was particularly high for some countries such as New Zealand, Australia and Sri Lanka compared to 2006. A total of 127 A(H1) viruses and 154 A(H3) viruses sent to the Centre during

Discussion

Adamantane resistance in A(H3) strains has continued to increase in many countries from 2005 to 2007 (e.g. Australia, Japan, Malaysia, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Philippines, and Singapore) while remaining very high in other places (e.g. Macau, Taiwan, and South Africa) (Barr et al., 2007, Saito et al., 2008) including the USA (A(H3) were 99.4% resistant in 2007–2008, CDC, 2008). Resistance in A(H1) strains however has been quite variable during this period. For example in Australia there was

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Influenza Centres and laboratories in Australia, Cambodia, France, New Caledonia, New Zealand, South Africa, Malaysia, Philippines, Macau (SAR), Singapore, the Solomon Islands, South Africa, Taiwan (POC) and Thailand, for providing influenza isolates that were used for analysis in this paper. The Melbourne WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza is supported by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.

References (38)

  • I.G. Barr et al.

    Increased adamantane resistance in influenza A(H3) viruses in Australia and neighbouring countries in 2005

    Antiviral Res.

    (2006)
  • I.G. Barr et al.

    Circulation and antigenic drift in human influenza B viruses in SE Asia and Oceania since 2000

    Commun. Dis. Intell.

    (2006)
  • R.A. Bright et al.

    Adamantane resistance among influenza A viruses isolated during the 2005-2006 influenza season in the United States

    JAMA

    (2006)
  • Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

    High levels of adamantane resistance among influenza A(H3N2) viruses and interim guidelines for use of antiviral agents—United States, 2005–06 influenza season

    Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.

    (2006)
  • Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2008. Fluview. 2007–2008 Influenza Season Week 12, ending March 22,...
  • C.L. Cheung et al.

    Distribution of amantadine-resistant H5N1 avian influenza variants in Asia

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (2006)
  • V.M. Deyde et al.

    Surveillance of resistance to adamantanes among influenza A(H3) and A(H1N1) viruses isolated worldwide

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (2007)
  • V.M. Deyde et al.

    Reply to Saito et al.

    J. Infect. Dis.

    (2008)
  • J. Felsenstein

    PHYLIP—phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)

    Cladistics

    (1989)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Incidence of antiviral drug resistance markers among human influenza A viruses in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, 2005–2016

      2019, Infection, Genetics and Evolution
      Citation Excerpt :

      Resistance to adamantanes reached 100% by 2011 among H1 and H3 viruses in the EMR. This is consistent with the globally reported trend of universal adamantane-resistance among circulating influenza A viruses (H1 and H3) during the same period (Barr et al., 2008; Deyde et al., 2007; Dong et al., 2015; Sheu et al., 2011). Egypt is the only country in the EMR region where A/H5N1 viruses are endemic and human cases are reported (Centre for Health Protection, 2017; Kim, 2018).

    • Antiviral resistance among highly pathogenic influenza A (H5N1) viruses isolated worldwide in 2002-2012 shows need for continued monitoring

      2013, Antiviral Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our data suggest that some residues (L26I + S31N) in the M2 protein of H5N1 viruses are under stronger drug selection pressure. The predominance of double M2 mutations among human and avian H5N1 viruses also suggests a different pattern of selection than with seasonal H3N2 and H1N1pdm09 viruses, which are characterized by single S31N M2 mutations (Bright et al. 2006; Barr et al., 2008). Interestingly, we observed disproportional distribution of amantadine-resistant variants among avian and human viruses isolated in different years, most likely associated with a particular HA clade circulating in a given geographic area (Barr et al., 2008; Le et al., 2008).

    • A comparison of pyrosequencing and neuraminidase inhibition assays for the detection of oseltamivir-resistant pandemic influenza A(H1N1) 2009 viruses

      2011, Antiviral Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Viruses were grown in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells (Barr et al., 2003), A/Auckland/1/2009 and A/Osaka/180/2009 were used as reference wild-type and H275Y mutant H1N1pdm viruses, respectively. Viral RNAs were extracted from clinical specimens or cultured viruses (Barr et al., 2008). Superscript III one-step qRT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used for real-time RT-PCR with influenza A matrix specific primers and probes (Dawood et al., 2009) on an ABI 7500Fast instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

    • Development of a novel bead-based multiplex PCR assay for combined subtyping and oseltamivir resistance genotyping (H275Y) of seasonal and pandemic H1N1 influenza A viruses

      2010, Journal of Clinical Virology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The emergence of antiviral resistance is becoming an increasingly important problem worldwide. In the past few years amantadine resistance has increased dramatically for both A/H3N2 and A/H1N1.11–17 Resistance to the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir has also increased rapidly to levels approaching 100% for seasonal A/H1N1.18–22

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text