Major article
Prevalence of and risk factors for needlestick and sharps injuries among nursing students in Hong Kong

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.01.023Get rights and content

Background

Although nursing students are at greater risk for needlestick injuries (NSIs) and sharps injuries (SIs) than staff nurses, there is a lack of research on NSIs and SIs in students, especially in different years of study. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors for and prevalence of NSIs and SIs among nursing students in different years of study.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional survey study using a questionnaire confirmed to be valid and reliable, with a content validity index of 0.96 and reliability index of 0.82.

Results

A total of 878 nursing students (response rate, 76.61%), participated in the study. NSIs/SIs, NSIs, and SIs were significantly increased by year of study (P < .001) in both the study period and 12-month prevalence. Four predictors for NSIs/SIs were final-year study (odds ratio [OR], 11.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-36.7), perception of not receiving prevention training (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.1-7.5), perception of not using a kidney dish to contain used needles and sharps (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.7-10.3), and perception of not immediately discarding used needles and syringes into a sharps box (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-7.4).

Conclusions

Preclinical training, reinforcement of kidney dish use, immediate discarding of used needles, and adequate clinical supervision are essential elements in reducing the risk of NSIs and SIs.

Section snippets

Methods

In this cross-sectional survey study, participants were recruited by convenience sampling from a university with the largest number of nursing students among the 4 universities providing nursing education in Hong Kong.17

Results

A total of 1,146 questionnaires were distributed and 878 were returned, for a response rate of 76.61%. The response rate was 95.57% for first-year students, 87.17% for second- or third-year students, and 58.87% for final-year students. Questionnaires were distributed to students in class on weekdays on their usual study days, except for final-year students. The final-year students had clinical placement during weekdays and were scheduled to attend a 2-hour seminar on one particular Saturday, a

Discussion

This study is the first large-scale survey of the prevalence of NSIs/SIs, NSIs, and SIs and their associated factors among nursing students in Hong Kong. Our finding of year of study as a predictor for NSI and SI are consistent with a report from Australia,19 but not with findings from Italy7 and Turkey.10 In Australia, the 12-month prevalence of NSIs increased with year of study, from 4.3% in the first year to 11.4% in the second year and then 40.4% in the final year.19 In contrast, in Italy

Conclusion

This is the first large-scale study investigating NSIs and SIs among nursing students. Our data show that the prevalence of NSIs and SIs varies with year of study. Preclinical training, use of a kidney dish, immediate disposal of used needles, and adequate clinical supervision are essential components to reduce NSIs and SIs. Future research should explore ways to improve injury reporting among nursing students.

Cited by (32)

  • Is possible to train health professionals in prevention of high-risk pathogens like the Ebola by using the mobile phone?

    2019, Telematics and Informatics
    Citation Excerpt :

    From previous published studies, it is observed that nursing professionals are particularly susceptible to needle pricks, with this being the group with the highest incidence of biological accidents (Dulon et al., 2017). There are numerous factors that may contribute to the possibility of a biological accident, such as lack of experience, skills, or knowledge in handling materials; anxiety; inadequate working conditions, mental fatigue, or exhaustion; and lack of awareness towards oneself or other professionals (Cavalcante et al., 2013; Cheung et al., 2012; Petrucci et al., 2009; Souza-Borges et al., 2014; Tarantola et al., 2003; Yao et al., 2010). According to Olivera and Paiva, in the face of emergencies, health professionals have a higher incidence of biological accidents and a higher prevalence in the absence of the use of standard precautionary measures.

  • Exposure Survey of Trends in Occupational Practice (EXPO-S.T.O.P.) 2015: A national survey of sharps injuries and mucocutaneous blood exposures among health care workers in US hospitals

    2017, American Journal of Infection Control
    Citation Excerpt :

    Of the hospitals participating in EXPO-S.T.O.P. 2015, 43% were teaching hospitals. The increased SI rate in teaching hospitals over nonteaching hospitals (Table 2) mirrors that of previous EXPO-S.T.O.P.,5-7 EPINet,2 and MADPH4 surveys and is indicative of a teaching hospital's higher procedure intensity with concomitant higher use of sharps15 and their training role for nursing students16 and medical students,17 together with the added SI incidence in research (ie, nonbed) departments in teaching hospitals. In terms of clinical work groups, of the total reported SIs, 45.6% were reported by nurses and 32.8% by doctors.

  • Compliance with standard precautions among baccalaureate nursing students in a Saudi university: A self-report study

    2017, Journal of Infection and Public Health
    Citation Excerpt :

    Direct experience is an invaluable tool in psychomotor skill development and enhancement of decision-making [44]. As nursing students’ studies progress, they gradually get more practice in the nursing procedures that necessitate them to use standard precautions, and their skill competency improves [45]. In addition, students who had longer clinical exposure are more familiar with the hospital's guidelines and protocols regarding infection control and prevention, thus increasing their practice in observance of standard precautions.

  • Predictors for compliance of standard precautions among nursing students

    2015, American Journal of Infection Control
    Citation Excerpt :

    Their ages ranged from 18-29 years, with a mean age of 21.02 ± 1.46 years. The sex distribution of the study sample (female/male = 3:1) was similar to the sex ratio of students enrolled in the programs.19 More than 70% (n = 486) of NSs had attended SPs training.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Funding for this study was provided by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Conflict of interest: None to report.

View full text