Comparison of soil quality and nutrient budgets between organic and conventional kiwifruit orchards

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.02.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Three long-term (>10 years) systems of kiwifruit production were compared at 36 sites with respect to simple input/output nutrient budgets, extractable soil nutrient levels, soil organic matter status, the size and activity of the soil microbial biomass, earthworm numbers and key soil physical properties. These systems were (i) conventional production of the green-fleshed variety ‘Hayward’ (Green), (ii) organic production of ‘Hayward’ (Organic) and (iii) conventional production of the yellow/gold-fleshed variety ‘Hort 16A’ (Gold). Crop yields and nutrient removals were least for Organic and greatest for Gold, with Green being intermediate. The major nutrients removed in the harvested crop were K and N. Simple input/output nutrient budgets showed that inputs greatly exceeded removals in the harvested crop for all nutrients considered (i.e. N, P, S, K, Mg, Ca) in all three systems, suggesting nutrient inputs could be reduced. Soil organic C and total N content were greater under Organic and Gold than Green whilst extractable P was least under Organic. Soluble C, basal respiration and metabolic quotient were unaffected by production system whilst microbial biomass C and N were greatest under Organic. Within systems, organic C, total N, microbial biomass C and N and mineralisable N were greater between plant rows than below the vine canopies whilst the reverse was the case for metabolic quotient and extractable P. Soil bulk density was least and water content at field capacity and earthworm numbers were greatest under the organic systems. It was concluded that long-term soil fertility can be maintained adequately under organic management and added benefits are increased organic matter content, a larger microbial biomass and improved soil physical condition. Although Organic orchards generally produce less fruit than their Green counterparts, mainly because of fertiliser differences and the absence of synthetic growth regulators, comparatively good returns and surpluses can still be achieved.

Introduction

There is an increasing worldwide requirement for agricultural and horticultural produce not only to meet high standards of quality but also to be produced using environmentally sound practices. To this end, principles of sustainability and resilience have an increasingly important part to play in the drafting of economically viable production protocols. The increasing interest in organic production systems is in response to notions that they are inherently more sustainable (Condron et al., 2000) although evidence for this is scarce. The market premiums that organic produce can earn over their conventional counterparts can ensure economic viability in the face of generally lower overall production (Pacini et al., 2003, Reganold et al., 1993, Springett et al., 1994).

The New Zealand Agriculture Research Group on Sustainability (ARGOS) is seeking to identify pathways to improve sustainability for New Zealand agriculture. To this end, ARGOS is studying and comparing the economic, social and environmental consequences of differing farming systems. An important first question for ARGOS is whether certified organic systems do, in fact, perform differently from their conventional counterparts. Kiwifruit orchards are a small scale, highly intense system which represents an important export industry for New Zealand. Kiwifruit orchards are a woody and complex ecological landscape supporting a highly intensive form of agriculture, which contrast greatly with the other types of broad-acre livestock farming systems that ARGOS is studying. A major part of any comparison of resilience between production systems includes soil quality and whether commercially intensive systems are more damaging to soil's fertility and biological function than an arguably more “natural” organic system.

In this study, three long-term (>10 years) kiwifruit (Actinidia spp.) systems are compared. These are (i) conventional production of the green-fleshed variety, ‘Hayward’, (ii) organic production of ‘Hayward’ and (iii) conventional production of the newer, golden-fleshed kiwifruit variety, ‘Hort 16A’. The comparison included simple input/output nutrient budgets, extractable soil nutrient levels, soil physical properties, size and activity of the soil microbial biomass and earthworm numbers.

Section snippets

Site selection

Thirty-six orchards were selected and evenly divided between three groups: (i) conventionally managed ‘Hayward’ (Actinidia deliciosa), (ii) organically managed ‘Hayward’, and (iii) conventionally managed ‘Hort 16A’ (Actinidia chinensis). Conventional management follows a crop protection programme called “KiwiGreen” prescribed by the export company ZESPRI International Ltd. which provides a single point of entry into markets. It is based on integrated management principles and has emphasis on

Site and soils characterization

The Te Puke region, where 10 of the clusters were based, has average annual air and soil temperatures and rainfall of 14.0 °C, 14.3 °C and 1720 mm, respectively, a little lower than that for the Keri Keri region cluster (15.2 °C, 15.2 °C and 1750 mm, respectively). The Motueka cluster, being considerably further south, has significantly lower average annual air and soil temperatures but also lower annual rainfall (12.5 °C, 11.5 °C and 1420 mm, respectively).

Approximately 90% of soil textures for the

Production, nutrient levels and budgets

Differences in production levels between conventional and organic Hayward kiwifruit systems in this study, and indeed industry-wide, can largely be attributed to the use of hydrogen cyanamide, a plant growth regulator permitted on conventional, but not organic, orchards that significantly improves bud break and flowering. Nutritional differences may also play a part as Organic fruit are generally smaller than Green and Gold fruit, typically by ∼5% (Zespri International, 2008). The Hort 16A

Conclusions

Simple input/output nutrient budgets at the orchards in this study showed that nutrient inputs greatly exceeded removals in the harvested crop for all measured nutrients (i.e. N, P, S, K and Mg) in all three systems. Even taking into account potential fixation/immobilization by soil components, nutrient inputs seem excessive and there is potential to reduce them, especially in conventional systems where inorganic inputs are the norm. The sources used in Organic systems, however, are more slowly

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. Jeff Reid, Andrea Pearson and Duncan Hedderley of the Institute of Crop and Food Research who were instrumental in the setting the original design of the ARGOS program and its statistical analysis (D. Hedderley). We are grateful to the growers who allowed us access to their land and Lesley Hunt of Lincoln University for advice on statistical analysis. The study was funded by the New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (FRST) through the Agricultural

References (35)

  • L.C. Blakemore et al.

    Methods for Chemical Analysis of Soils

    (1987)
  • Benge, J., 2006. Annual ARGOS Sector Report—Kiwifruit. The Agriculture Research Group On Sustainability (ARGOS), A1...
  • J.R. Benge et al.

    Pairwise comparison of the storage potential of kiwifruit from organic and conventional production systems

    N. Z. J. Crop Hort. Sci.

    (2000)
  • BioGro NZ Ltd., 2001. Bio-Gro New Zealand Organic Standards Module 3.1. Standards for Evaluation of Inputs. Website:...
  • Boyd, L., 2005. Review of kiwifruit mineral nutrition. HortResearch Client Report No. 16838 for ZESPRI International...
  • C.J. Clark et al.

    Seasonal accumulation of mineral nutrients by kiwifruit 2

    Fruit. New Phytol.

    (1988)
  • L.M. Condron et al.

    A comparison of soil and environmental quality under organic and conventional farming systems in New Zealand

    N. Z. J. Agric. Res.

    (2000)
  • J.R. Crush et al.

    Proc. of the N.Z. Grass. Ass.

    (1997)
  • E.J.B. Cutler

    Soils

  • A.R. Ferguson et al.

    Estimated annual removal of macronutrients in fruit and prunings from a kiwifruit orchard

    N. Z. J. Agric. Res.

    (1983)
  • R.F. Follett

    Soil management concepts and carbon sequestration in cropland soils

    Soil Till. Res.

    (2001)
  • P.M. Fraser et al.

    Earthworm species, population size and biomass under different cropping systems across the Canterbury Plains, New Zealand

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (1996)
  • R.B. Grossman et al.

    Bulk density and linear extensibility

  • R. Harrison et al.

    A review of the effect of N fertilizer type on gaseous emissions

    Adv. Agron.

    (2001)
  • A.E. Hewitt

    New Zealand Soil Classification

    (1993)
  • R.G. Jorgenson

    Microbial activity—the fumigation extraction method

  • R.G. Jorgenson

    Microbial activity—the fumigation extraction method for microbial biomass nitrogen

  • Cited by (43)

    • Potential geographical distribution of Actinidia spp. and its predominant indices under climate change

      2022, Ecological Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another study showed that 14 °C temperatures profited kiwi fruit growth (Carey et al., 2009). The annual precipitation experienced by kiwi fruit in New Zealand is much greater than that in China (Carey et al., 2009; Salinger and Kenny, 1995). In recent years, expert evaluation, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy mathematics theory, and GIS technology have been successfully utilized in ecological suitability assessment (Kaur et al., 2020; Zabihi et al., 2020).

    • Both organic and integrated pest management of apple orchards maintain soil health as compared to a semi-natural reference system

      2022, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      For other soil health metrics, differences among organic and conventional fruit cultivation systems remain less clear and seem to be highly context dependent. Several studies report that organic practices are associated with improved levels of soil organic matter, lower soil bulk densities, higher availability of N and P and improved biological soil properties in general (Carey et al., 2009; Di Prima et al., 2018; Reganold et al., 2001; Sanchez et al., 2003). However, other studies have found no significant difference between organic and conventional fruit farms (Glover et al., 2000; Orpet et al., 2020).

    • Optimising survey effort to monitor environmental variables: A case study using New Zealand kiwifruit orchards

      2016, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Also, a further approach to potentially increasing power would be to conduct more intensive sampling within each orchard at each survey. For the purposes of our analyses we assumed that the sector adopts established sampling protocols for environmental monitoring on kiwifruit orchards, as employed for the collection of the pilot data (Carey et al., 2009; MacLeod et al., 2012b) and only considers varying survey frequency and size. We do not explicitly investigate the effects of varying ‘within orchard’ effort, since such methodological changes would vary among the environmental variables monitored, and thus difficult to compare.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text