Original InvestigationMean Thoracic Aortic Wall Thickness Determination by Cine MRI with Steady-State Free Precession: Validation with Dark Blood Imaging
Section snippets
Study Population
The study was approved by the institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from each participant before enrollment.
This prospective study included healthy subjects without absolute or relative contraindications to MRI such as pacemaker, non–MR-compatible implants, and pregnancy. Subjects without sinus rhythm were not included in this study.
Fifty volunteers, 26 women and 24 men, with a mean age of 50.2 ± 13.1 years were enrolled in this study.
Imaging Protocol
MRI was performed in a
MAWT of Ascending and Descending Aorta
One MAWT measurement of the ascending aorta could not be performed due to poor visualization of the aortic wall in the DB sequence. Thus, 49 image datasets for the ascending and 50 datasets for the descending aorta were analyzed.
The median trigger time of the DB and SSFP sequence was 645.0 ms (IQR: 585.0–722.5 ms) and 653 ms (IQR: 587.5–721.0 ms), respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .780).
The mean MAWT of the ascending aorta on DB and SSFP images was 1.89 ±
Discussion
The results of this study indicate that determination of MAWT in the ascending and descending aorta using cine SSFP sequences is valid and reliable compared to DB imaging although cine SSFP MRI has lower spatial resolution.
MRI using DB imaging is a feasible technique for the determination of aortic wall thickness with high interobserver agreement (9). The DB technique highlights the aortic wall by enhancing contrast between the hyperintense wall and the dark lumen through suppression of the
Conclusion
In conclusion, MAWT determination in the ascending and descending aorta using a cine SSFP sequence yields valid and reliable results when compared to the well-established DB imaging technique. Because cine imaging is an integral part of every cardiac MRI protocol, its use for MAWT measurement allows routine clinical determination of this important parameter.
References (14)
- et al.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance parameters of atherosclerotic plaque burden improve discrimination of prior major adverse cardiovascular events
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
(2009) - et al.
Sex, race, and age distributions of mean aortic wall thickness in a multiethnic population-based sample
J Vasc Surg
(2011) - et al.
Usefulness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of the superficial femoral artery for screening patients with diabetes mellitus for atherosclerosis
Am J Cardiol
(2012) - et al.
Magnetic resonance of carotid artery ageing in healthy subjects
Atherosclerosis
(2009) - et al.
Association of wall thickness of the brachial artery measured with high-resolution ultrasound with risk factors and coronary artery disease
Am J Cardiol
(2002) - et al.
Arterial wall thickness is associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease in middle-aged adults. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study
Stroke
(1995) - et al.
Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study
Circulation
(1997)
Cited by (25)
Aortic local biomechanical properties in ascending aortic aneurysms
2022, Acta BiomaterialiaCitation Excerpt :From the data presented in our paper, the thickness difference between the medial quadrant and the lateral quadrant can be as high as 16%. In general, the aortic thickness is quoted to be between 1.5 mm to 2.7 mm [29–31]. An earlier study in 1980 reported that the thickness difference between in vivo and in vitro measurements was within 20% [32].
Development and multi-level validation of a computational model to predict traumatic aortic injury
2021, Computers in Biology and MedicineCitation Excerpt :To improve the biofidelity of the aortic organ for injury prediction, a number of modifications were made to the baseline model to update the material properties with more accurate constitutive models (Table 1). The aortic wall model was created to include nonlinear behavior with a single mean thickness of t = 2 mm [41,42]. The mechanical properties of the aortic wall (e.g., stress–strain response curves, failure threshold) in published studies exhibited a very large discrepancy [25,26,28–32].
Response to “Re Biomechanical Assessment Predicts Aneurysm Related Events in Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm”
2021, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular SurgeryCardiovascular risk factors and thoracic aortic wall thickness in a general population
2015, Journal of Vascular and Interventional RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Two regions of interest were placed manually including the internal and external aortic wall of the ascending aorta. The radius of each area was calculated, assuming that all areas are circular (10,11). AWT was calculated as the difference in the radii of the external and internal aortic area (15).
Cardiovascular aging: Insights from local and regional measures of aortic stiffness using magnetic resonance imaging
2014, Artery ResearchCitation Excerpt :In this study SBP and hypertension were also independent correlates of increased wall thickness. Good reproducibility for this measurement has been reported.5,6 However, the spatial resolution of most acquisitions (0.7–1 mm) being about half of the expected thickness for the aortic wall (1.5–2.5 mm) we believe that partial volume remains a major drawback that will require higher spatial resolution and refined automated quantification methods to be accurate.
Simultaneous Highly Efficient Contrast-Free Lumen and Vessel Wall MR Imaging for Anatomical Assessment of Aortic Disease
2023, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
The authors declare that they have not received any grants or funding supporting the research.