Skip to main content
Log in

Wetting Characteristics of Insect Wing Surfaces

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological tiny structures have been observed on many kinds of surfaces such as lotus leaves, which have an effect on the coloration of Morpho butterflies and enhance the hydrophobicity of natural surfaces. We investigated the micro-scale and nano-scale structures on the wing surfaces of insects and found that the hierarchical multiple roughness structures help in enhancing the hydrophobicity. After examining 10 orders and 24 species of flying Pterygotan insects, we found that micro-scale and nano-scale structures typically exist on both the upper and lower wing surfaces of flying insects. The tiny structures such as denticle or setae on the insect wings enhance the hydrophobicity, thereby enabling the wings to be cleaned more easily. And the hydrophobic insect wings undergo a transition from Cassie to Wenzel states at pitch/size ratio of about 20. In order to examine the wetting characteristics on a rough surface, a biomimetic surface with micro-scale pillars is fabricated on a silicon wafer, which exhibits the same behavior as the insect wing, with the Cassie-Wenzel transition occurring consistently around a pitch/width value of 20.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Annals of Botany, 1997, 79, 667–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feng L, Li S, Li Y, Li H, Zhang L, Zhai J, Song Y, Liu B, Jiang L, Zhu, D. Super-hydrophobic surfaces: From natural to artificial. Advanced Materials, 2002, 14, 1857–1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma M, Hill R M. Superhydrophobic surfaces. Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science, 2006, 11, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vukusic P, Sambles J R. Photonic structures in biology. Nature, 2003, 424, 852–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bushnell D M, Moore K J. Drag reduction in nature. Annual Reviews in Fluid Mechanics, 1991, 23, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner T, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. Wettability and contaminability of insect wings as a function of their surface sculptures. Acta Zoologica, 1996, 77, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cong Q, Chen G, Fang Y, Ren L. Super-hydrophobic characteristics of butterfly wing surface. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2004, 1, 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fang Y, Sun G, Cong Q, Chen G, Ren L. Effect of methanol on wettability of the non-smooth surface on butterfly wing. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2008, 5, 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker A R, Lawrence C R. Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature, 2001, 414, 33–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao X, Jiang L. Water-repellent legs of water striders. Nature, 2004, 432, 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wenzel R N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 1936, 28, 988–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cassie A B D, Baxter S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1944, 40, 546–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Patankar N A. Transition between superhydrophobic states on rough Surfaces. Langmuir, 2004, 20, 7097–7102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lafuma A, Quere D. Superhydrophobic states. Nature Materials, 2003, 2, 457–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krupenkin T N, Taylor J A, Schneider T M, Yang S. From rolling ball to complete wetting: The dynamic tuning of liquids on nanostructured surfaces. Langmuir, 2004, 20, 3824–3827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner P, Furstner R, Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Quantitative assessment to the structural basis of water repellency in natural and technical surfaces. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2003, 54, 1295–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Patankar N A. Mimicking the lotus effect: Influence of double roughness structures and slender pillars. Langmuir, 2004, 20, 8209–8213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B. Roughness optimization for biomimetic superhydrophobic surfaces. Microsystem Technologies, 2005, 11, 535–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nosonovsky M. Multiscale roughness and stability of superhydrophobic biomimetic interfaces. Langmuir, 2007, 23, 3157–3161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Barbieri L, Wagner E, Hoffmann P. Water wetting transition parameters of perfluorinated substrates with periodically distributed flat-top microscale obstacles. Langmuir, 2007, 23, 1723–1734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen Y, He B, Lee J, Patankar N A. Anisotropy in the wetting of rough surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2005, 281, 458–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doyoung Byun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Byun, D., Hong, J., Saputra et al. Wetting Characteristics of Insect Wing Surfaces. J Bionic Eng 6, 63–70 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60092-X

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60092-X

Keywords

Navigation