Elsevier

The Lancet Neurology

Volume 10, Issue 10, October 2011, Pages 922-930
The Lancet Neurology

Review
Management of refractory status epilepticus in adults: still more questions than answers

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70187-9Get rights and content

Summary

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is defined as status epilepticus that continues despite treatment with benzodiazepines and one antiepileptic drug. RSE should be treated promptly to prevent morbidity and mortality; however, scarce evidence is available to support the choice of specific treatments. Major independent outcome predictors are age (not modifiable) and cause (which should be actively targeted). Recent recommendations for adults suggest that the aggressiveness of treatment for RSE should be tailored to the clinical situation. To minimise intensive care unit-related complications, focal RSE without impairment of consciousness might initially be approached conservatively; conversely, early induction of pharmacological coma is advisable in generalised convulsive forms of the disorder. At this stage, midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates are the most commonly used drugs. Several other treatments, such as additional anaesthetics, other antiepileptic or immunomodulatory compounds, or non-pharmacological approaches (eg, electroconvulsive treatment or hypothermia), have been used in protracted RSE. Treatment lasting weeks or months can sometimes result in a good outcome, as in selected patients after encephalitis or autoimmune disorders. Well designed prospective studies of RSE are urgently needed.

Introduction

With an annual incidence of 10–40 per 100 000 population,1, 2, 3 status epilepticus (SE) is the second most frequent neurological emergency (acute stroke being the first) with a risk of major morbidity or mortality.4 Irrespective of the timeframe, SE that persists despite adequate administration of benzodiazepines and at least one antiepileptic drug is labelled refractory SE (RSE).5, 6 This resistance to treatment occurs in 23–43% of patients with SE; the only prospective study of RSE frequency6 estimates lower proportions than retrospective assessments that are based in the intensive care unit (ICU).7, 8, 9 RSE is mostly associated with acute, severe, and potentially fatal underlying causes, such as encephalitis, massive stroke, or rapidly progressive primary brain tumours, and is typically accompanied by severe impairment of consciousness.6, 7, 10

Over the past few decades, important advances in the understanding of the basic mechanisms underlying SE and RSE have been achieved, mostly from seminal animal studies. However, animal data cannot be automatically translated to patients, and up to now, well designed studies of epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutic aspects remain scarce. Treatment for RSE is not evidence-based, despite the disorder being recognised as an important entity in emergency and intensive care settings.

Our principal aim in this Review is to summarise present knowledge of RSE in adults, with particular attention to the balance between risks and benefits of different treatment strategies, including rarely used options. In view of the substantial differences in pathophysiologcal mechanisms and treatment approaches in neonates and infants, our focus is on older children and adults. We also identify areas in need of further research, and draw attention to some practical difficulties that need to be overcome for well designed, prospective clinical studies to take place.

Section snippets

Mortality and morbidity

The short-term fatality rates for RSE have been estimated to be between 16% and 39%;6, 7, 8, 9 mortality after RSE is about three times higher than for non-refractory SE.6, 7 For most fatalities, death does not occur during persisting SE but after its (sometimes late) resolution, and is generally attributable to underlying clinical problems.6 This observation illustrates the crucial prognostic importance of SE causation: together with age, cause is consistently identified as the principal

Rationale for early treatment

In view of the danger of RSE and the effects of duration on outcome, broad consensus exists about the need for timely and effective pharmacological treatment.5, 19, 20, 21, 22 Additionally, data from the Veteran Affairs Cooperative Study23 showed that SE treatment becomes less effective as the episode becomes more protracted; subtle SE (or non-convulsive SE with coma), a form usually indicative of a longer duration, was controlled by the first medication in 15% of patients compared with 55% in

Basic principles of SE treatment

The principal aims in treatment of a patient with SE are to achieve rapid control of seizures and to avoid complications. During the early stages, imitators should be ruled out, since the correct diagnosis could be impossible to make once a patient has been placed under pharmacological coma, potentially leading to dangerous iatrogenic complications. Acute movement disorders, such as focal or segmental dystonias, tremors, and choreatic movements,32 can sometimes present unilaterally in confused

Choice of anaesthetic agents

When elective coma induction is warranted to control RSE, the initial drug is restricted to three groups of compounds56 (table 1), whose shared characteristic is the modulation of GABAA receptors, although each acts on specific sites. Midazolam is a benzodiazepine that is already being used as a first-line treatment. Its half-life, which is short after a single bolus, increases to 6–50 h after prolonged administration. However, tachyphylaxis often develops within 24–48 h,57 so the perfusion

Electroencephalography targets

Electroencephalography (EEG) should be used to monitor the effects of anaesthetics in the treatment of RSE. An alternative might be the bispectral index,67 an automated, amplitude-integrated measure of a two-channel EEG derivation (that includes a burst-suppression ratio). This index is frequently used by anaesthetists in the operation room to monitor anaesthesia depth; however, it should not routinely replace EEG with comprehensive scalp coverage if this equipment is available, because the

Other pharmacological approaches

Several anecdotal case reports and small series (table 2) describe treatment options for RSE that does not respond to the first intravenous anaesthetic agents. However, because of the absence of comparative data their absolute value is difficult to assess. Other anaesthetics can be used sequentially in patients with very longlasting RSE, in alternation or combination with midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates. Inhalational anaesthetics, which act, in part, on GABAA receptors, might be effective

Non-pharmacological approaches

Pharmacological treatment can be supported and potentiated by non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies; however, non-pharmacological therapies are mostly last-resort approaches in cases of very refractory SE. The substantial variability in the reports in terms of clinical setting (particularly causes and concomitant therapies) greatly restricts the generalisability of these treatments (table 3).

Resective surgery can be a useful option in selected patients when a definite seizure focus

When to stop RSE treatment

Although longlasting RSE generally heralds a poor prognosis, some exceptions exist; patients who have RSE for several days, weeks, or even months can sometimes recover with a good functional outcome.15, 100, 116, 117, 118 In some patients, most often those in whom the disorder has an infectious or autoimmune cause, the underlying disease process subsides after some time, allowing awakening of the patient without repetitive seizures. Therefore, supportive treatment, including repetitive courses

Conclusions and future directions

Refractory SE represents a heterogeneous entity that arises frequently in every hospital setting. There is a strong consensus about the need for an early, effective treatment to prevent morbidity and mortality. In the first hours, it seems reasonable to tune treatment aggressiveness (pharmacological coma induction) according to the clinical subtypes; whereas generalised convulsive SE must be approached aggressively, focal SE and SE related to idiopathic generalised epilepsy (absence and

Search strategy and selection criteria

Papers in English, French, and German published between 1966 and May 31, 2011 were searched through PubMed and via cross referencing, with the terms “status epilepticus”, “treatment”, “refractory”, and “therapy”. The final set of papers was selected on the basis of the quality of each publication and the pertinence to this Review.

References (126)

  • EE Ubogu et al.

    Ketamine for refractory status epilepticus: a case of possible ketamine-induced neurotoxicity

    Epilepsy Behav

    (2003)
  • V Jevtovic-Todorovic et al.

    Propofol and sodium thiopental protect against MK-801-induced neuronal necrosis in the posterior cingulate/retrosplenial cortex

    Brain Res

    (2001)
  • H Potschka et al.

    P-Glycoprotein-mediated efflux of phenobarbital, lamotrigine, and felbamate at the blood-brain barrier: evidence from microdialysis experiments in rats

    Neurosci Lett

    (2002)
  • M Bodenant et al.

    Interest of the ketogenic diet in a refractory status epilepticus in adults

    Rev Neurol (Paris)

    (2008)
  • A Coeytaux et al.

    Incidence of status epilepticus in French-speaking Switzerland: (EPISTAR)

    Neurology

    (2000)
  • RJ DeLorenzo et al.

    A prospective, population-based epidemiologic study of status epilepticus in Richmond, Virginia

    Neurology

    (1996)
  • S Knake et al.

    Incidence of status epilepticus in adults in Germany: a prospective, population-based study

    Epilepsia

    (2001)
  • DH Lowenstein et al.

    Status epilepticus

    N Engl J Med

    (1998)
  • M Holtkamp

    Treatment strategies for refractory status epilepticus

    Curr Opin Crit Care

    (2011)
  • J Novy et al.

    Refractory status epilepticus: a prospective observational study

    Epilepsia

    (2010)
  • M Holtkamp et al.

    Predictors and prognosis of refractory status epilepticus treated in a neurological intensive care unit

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • SA Mayer et al.

    Refractory status epilepticus: frequency, risk factors, and impact on outcome

    Arch Neurol

    (2002)
  • AO Rossetti et al.

    Refractory status epilepticus: effect of treatment aggressiveness on prognosis

    Arch Neurol

    (2005)
  • M Holtkamp et al.

    A malignant variant of status epilepticus

    Arch Neurol

    (2005)
  • G Logroscino et al.

    Short-term mortality after a first episode of status epilepticus

    Epilepsia

    (1997)
  • AO Rossetti et al.

    Prognosis of status epilepticus: role of aetiology, age, and consciousness impairment at presentation

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • AR Towne et al.

    Determinants of mortality in status epilepticus

    Epilepsia

    (1994)
  • FW Drislane et al.

    Duration of refractory status epilepticus and outcome: loss of prognostic utility after several hours

    Epilepsia

    (2009)
  • DC Hesdorffer et al.

    Risk of unprovoked seizure after acute symptomatic seizure: effect of status epilepticus

    Ann Neurol

    (1998)
  • N Adachi et al.

    Intellectual prognosis of status epilepticus in adult epilepsy patients: analysis with Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-revised

    Epilepsia

    (2005)
  • S Legriel et al.

    Functional outcome after convulsive status epilepticus

    Crit Care Med

    (2010)
  • TP Bleck

    Refractory status epilepticus

    Curr Opin Crit Care

    (2005)
  • DH Lowenstein

    The management of refractory status epilepticus: an update

    Epilepsia

    (2006)
  • DM Treiman et al.

    A comparison of four treatments for generalized convulsive status epilepticus. Veterans Affairs Status Epilepticus Cooperative Study Group

    N Engl J Med

    (1998)
  • DM Treiman et al.

    Treatment of status epilepticus if first drug fails

    Epilepsia

    (1999)
  • NY Walton

    Systemic effects of generalized convulsive status epilepticus

    Epilepsia

    (1993)
  • E Lothman

    The biochemical basis and pathophysiology of status epilepticus

    Neurology

    (1990)
  • BS Meldrum et al.

    Physiology of status epilepticus in primates

    Arch Neurol

    (1973)
  • HP Goodkin et al.

    Status epilepticus increases the intracellular accumulation of GABAA receptors

    J Neurosci

    (2005)
  • KL Poston et al.

    Movement disorder emergencies

    J Neurol

    (2008)
  • WC LaFrance

    Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

    Curr Opin Neurol

    (2008)
  • M Reuber et al.

    Failure to recognize psychogenic nonepileptic seizures may cause death

    Neurology

    (2004)
  • M Holtkamp et al.

    Diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic status epilepticus in the emergency setting

    Neurology

    (2006)
  • H Meierkord et al.

    EFNS guideline on the management of status epilepticus in adults

    Eur J Neurol

    (2010)
  • BK Alldredge et al.

    A comparison of lorazepam, diazepam, and placebo for the treatment of out-of-hospital status epilepticus

    N Engl J Med

    (2001)
  • IE Leppik et al.

    Double-blind study of lorazepam and diazepam in status epilepticus

    JAMA

    (1983)
  • K Prasad et al.

    Anticonvulsant therapy for status epilepticus

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2005)
  • A Aranda et al.

    Generalized convulsive status epilepticus management in adults: a cohort study with evaluation of professional practice

    Epilepsia

    (2010)
  • S Shorvon

    The treatment of status epilepticus

    Curr Opin Neurol

    (2011)
  • P Genton et al.

    Absence status epilepsy: delineation of a distinct idiopathic generalized epilepsy syndrome

    Epilepsia

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text