Papers in English, French, and German published between 1966 and May 31, 2011 were searched through PubMed and via cross referencing, with the terms “status epilepticus”, “treatment”, “refractory”, and “therapy”. The final set of papers was selected on the basis of the quality of each publication and the pertinence to this Review.
ReviewManagement of refractory status epilepticus in adults: still more questions than answers
Introduction
With an annual incidence of 10–40 per 100 000 population,1, 2, 3 status epilepticus (SE) is the second most frequent neurological emergency (acute stroke being the first) with a risk of major morbidity or mortality.4 Irrespective of the timeframe, SE that persists despite adequate administration of benzodiazepines and at least one antiepileptic drug is labelled refractory SE (RSE).5, 6 This resistance to treatment occurs in 23–43% of patients with SE; the only prospective study of RSE frequency6 estimates lower proportions than retrospective assessments that are based in the intensive care unit (ICU).7, 8, 9 RSE is mostly associated with acute, severe, and potentially fatal underlying causes, such as encephalitis, massive stroke, or rapidly progressive primary brain tumours, and is typically accompanied by severe impairment of consciousness.6, 7, 10
Over the past few decades, important advances in the understanding of the basic mechanisms underlying SE and RSE have been achieved, mostly from seminal animal studies. However, animal data cannot be automatically translated to patients, and up to now, well designed studies of epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutic aspects remain scarce. Treatment for RSE is not evidence-based, despite the disorder being recognised as an important entity in emergency and intensive care settings.
Our principal aim in this Review is to summarise present knowledge of RSE in adults, with particular attention to the balance between risks and benefits of different treatment strategies, including rarely used options. In view of the substantial differences in pathophysiologcal mechanisms and treatment approaches in neonates and infants, our focus is on older children and adults. We also identify areas in need of further research, and draw attention to some practical difficulties that need to be overcome for well designed, prospective clinical studies to take place.
Section snippets
Mortality and morbidity
The short-term fatality rates for RSE have been estimated to be between 16% and 39%;6, 7, 8, 9 mortality after RSE is about three times higher than for non-refractory SE.6, 7 For most fatalities, death does not occur during persisting SE but after its (sometimes late) resolution, and is generally attributable to underlying clinical problems.6 This observation illustrates the crucial prognostic importance of SE causation: together with age, cause is consistently identified as the principal
Rationale for early treatment
In view of the danger of RSE and the effects of duration on outcome, broad consensus exists about the need for timely and effective pharmacological treatment.5, 19, 20, 21, 22 Additionally, data from the Veteran Affairs Cooperative Study23 showed that SE treatment becomes less effective as the episode becomes more protracted; subtle SE (or non-convulsive SE with coma), a form usually indicative of a longer duration, was controlled by the first medication in 15% of patients compared with 55% in
Basic principles of SE treatment
The principal aims in treatment of a patient with SE are to achieve rapid control of seizures and to avoid complications. During the early stages, imitators should be ruled out, since the correct diagnosis could be impossible to make once a patient has been placed under pharmacological coma, potentially leading to dangerous iatrogenic complications. Acute movement disorders, such as focal or segmental dystonias, tremors, and choreatic movements,32 can sometimes present unilaterally in confused
Choice of anaesthetic agents
When elective coma induction is warranted to control RSE, the initial drug is restricted to three groups of compounds56 (table 1), whose shared characteristic is the modulation of GABAA receptors, although each acts on specific sites. Midazolam is a benzodiazepine that is already being used as a first-line treatment. Its half-life, which is short after a single bolus, increases to 6–50 h after prolonged administration. However, tachyphylaxis often develops within 24–48 h,57 so the perfusion
Electroencephalography targets
Electroencephalography (EEG) should be used to monitor the effects of anaesthetics in the treatment of RSE. An alternative might be the bispectral index,67 an automated, amplitude-integrated measure of a two-channel EEG derivation (that includes a burst-suppression ratio). This index is frequently used by anaesthetists in the operation room to monitor anaesthesia depth; however, it should not routinely replace EEG with comprehensive scalp coverage if this equipment is available, because the
Other pharmacological approaches
Several anecdotal case reports and small series (table 2) describe treatment options for RSE that does not respond to the first intravenous anaesthetic agents. However, because of the absence of comparative data their absolute value is difficult to assess. Other anaesthetics can be used sequentially in patients with very longlasting RSE, in alternation or combination with midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates. Inhalational anaesthetics, which act, in part, on GABAA receptors, might be effective
Non-pharmacological approaches
Pharmacological treatment can be supported and potentiated by non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies; however, non-pharmacological therapies are mostly last-resort approaches in cases of very refractory SE. The substantial variability in the reports in terms of clinical setting (particularly causes and concomitant therapies) greatly restricts the generalisability of these treatments (table 3).
Resective surgery can be a useful option in selected patients when a definite seizure focus
When to stop RSE treatment
Although longlasting RSE generally heralds a poor prognosis, some exceptions exist; patients who have RSE for several days, weeks, or even months can sometimes recover with a good functional outcome.15, 100, 116, 117, 118 In some patients, most often those in whom the disorder has an infectious or autoimmune cause, the underlying disease process subsides after some time, allowing awakening of the patient without repetitive seizures. Therefore, supportive treatment, including repetitive courses
Conclusions and future directions
Refractory SE represents a heterogeneous entity that arises frequently in every hospital setting. There is a strong consensus about the need for an early, effective treatment to prevent morbidity and mortality. In the first hours, it seems reasonable to tune treatment aggressiveness (pharmacological coma induction) according to the clinical subtypes; whereas generalised convulsive SE must be approached aggressively, focal SE and SE related to idiopathic generalised epilepsy (absence and
Search strategy and selection criteria
References (126)
- et al.
Prognostic factors, morbidity and mortality in tonic-clonic status epilepticus: a review
Epilepsy Res
(2011) - et al.
Status epilepticus: pathophysiology and management in adults
Lancet Neurol
(2006) - et al.
Non-convulsive status epilepticus in adults: clinical forms and treatment
Lancet Neurol
(2007) - et al.
Time-dependent decrease in the effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs during the course of self-sustaining status epilepticus
Brain Res
(1998) - et al.
N-methyl-D-asparate receptor antagonists abolish the maintenance phase of self-sustaining status epilepticus in rat
Neurosci Lett
(1999) - et al.
NMDA receptor activation mediates the loss of GABAergic inhibition induced by recurrent seizures
Epilepsy Res
(1990) - et al.
Clinical characteristics of psychogenic nonepileptic seizure status in the long-term monitoring unit
Epilepsy Behav
(2006) - et al.
Emergency and intensive care unit management of status epilepticus in adult patients and children (new-born excluded). Société de réanimation de langue française experts recommendations
Rev Neurol (Paris)
(2009) No, some types of nonconvulsive status epilepticus cause little permanent neurologic sequelae (or: the cure may be worse than the disease)
Neurophysiol Clin
(2000)- et al.
Ketamine successfully terminates malignant status epilepticus
Epilepsy Res
(2008)