Elsevier

Current Opinion in Microbiology

Volume 2, Issue 6, 1 December 1999, Pages 657-662
Current Opinion in Microbiology

Review
Homology-dependent gene silencing in plants and fungi: a number of variations on the same theme

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(99)00041-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Homology-dependent gene silencing is a phenomenon that occurs in a broad range of organisms and has implications for both basic and applied science. Gene silencing is a mechanism that controls invading transposons and provides protection against virus infections. It also has evolutionary implications in genome maintenance. Recent studies have begun to unravel the molecular mechanisms of this puzzling phenomenon.

Introduction

Homology-dependent gene silencing (HDGS) as a result of the introduction of transgenes has been revealed in several organisms (reviewed in [1]). Gene silencing as a consequence of sequence duplications is particularly diffused among plant species. The introduction of transgenes in plants produces at least two different HDGS phenomena: post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) and transcriptional gene silencing (TGS). In fungi, silencing as consequence of sequence duplication has revealed a more complex scenario comprising several different gene silencing mechanisms.

This short review focuses on recent advances in the field of HDGS that are beginning to resolve the puzzle of this intriguing phenomenon. A substantial part of this review is dedicated to HDGS in plants because of the numerous studies that have been carried out in plant systems. However, particular attention is also dedicated to HDGS in fungi for two main reasons: first, the great variety of HDGS phenomena in fungi provides the opportunity to discover unique new molecular mechanisms of gene silencing; and second, the suitability of fungi as model systems enables us to address fundamental questions about the general mechanism of gene silencing.

On the basis of the idea that different HDGS phenomena may have evolved from an ancestral mechanism as a host defense response to invading sequences, such as transposons and viruses, we aim in this review to highlight commonalties of HDGS in fungi and plants.

Section snippets

Transcriptional gene silencing in plants

In both TGS and PTGS, silenced genes are inactivated in trans since interacting homologous genes are usually unlinked and reside in different chromosomes. Differences between the two HDGS mechanisms are in the homologous sequences: PTGS requires homology between coding sequences of interacting genes, whereas TGS requires homology between promoters.

TGS is reminiscent of paramutation in which an inactive allele (paramutagenic) can induce silencing of another (paramutable) allele. A DNA–DNA

Post-transcriptional gene silencing in plants

TGS is reminiscent of the already described gene silencing phenomena paramutation, whereas the discovery of PTGS has revealed the existence of a completely new and also unexpected gene silencing phenomenon (reviewed in 11, 12, 13). In contrast to TGS, silenced genes affected by PTGS are normally transcribed, but their transcripts do not accumulate as a consequence of rapid degradation. Even though the exact mechanism of PTGS is unknown, several studies have begun to unravel important PTGS

Premeiotic gene inactivation in fungi: RIP and MIP

Although there are fewer studies of HDGS phenomena in fungi compared with studies of plant HDGS, they revealed the existence of a number of variations of the same phenomenon. The discovery of the repeat induced point mutation (RIP) mechanism in Neurospora crassa is the first reported example of HDGS triggered by artificially introduced DNA [29]. To date, N. crassa and Ascobolus immersus seem to be the only organisms able to count the number of homologous sequence repeats and to inactivate them

HDGS in fungi vegetative cycle

The most studied and best-characterized HDGS phenomenon in fungi is ‘quelling’ in N. crassa [36]. Quelling shows strong similarities with PTGS in plants: it acts at post-transcriptional level, it is triggered by duplicated coding sequences, and it is reversible when transgenes are removed. However, the most important similarity between PTGS and quelling is that both are mediated by a diffusible trans-acting molecule, which in Neurospora is able to mediate gene silencing between nuclei in

HGDSs as defense systems

It now commonly accepted that HDGS phenomena can be considered as mechanisms that have evolved as defense responses to invading DNA sequences such as transposons or virus RNA sequences (reviewed in [43]). Indeed, there are at least two clear indications of involvement of HDGS in defense. First, several reports pointed out that PTGS in plants is strictly linked to RNA virus resistance mechanisms 44, 45, 46. Second, in Drosophila HDGS, which has several similarities to PTGS in plants, has been

An ancestral HDGS mechanism?

On the basis that different HDGS phenomena have evolved from an ancestral mechanism to protect genomes from invasive sequences, it is conceivable that they could share common steps in their mode of action. Although superficially the various gene silencing mechanisms seem to be different, fundamental similarities can be identified. In almost all the HDGS models, DNA–DNA interactions between homologous sequences is considered to be a key step (Figure 1). However, the recognition mechanism of

Conclusions and future perspectives

The discovery of HDGS has opened new perspectives in the understanding of genome maintenance and invading genomic sequences protection as well as gene regulation. The impressive amounts of studies carried out during the past few years have begun to uncover the complex mechanisms of the enigmatic silencing phenomena. However, great efforts will be necessary for a fine understanding of the molecular mechanisms HDGS and the isolation of cellular factors involved in different silencing mechanisms

Acknowledgements

We thank A Pickford for revising the manuscript. This work was supported in part by grants from the Istituto Pasteur Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, from the Ministero dell’ Universita’ e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, and from European Union BIOTECH program.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (53)

  • M. Stam et al.

    Position-dependent methylation and transcriptional silencing of transgenes in inverted T-DNA repeats: implications for posttranscriptional silencing of homologous host genes in plants

    Mol Cell Biol

    (1998)
  • M.F. Mette et al.

    Production of aberrant promoter transcripts contributes to methylation and silencing of unlinked homologous promoters in trans

    EMBO J

    (1999)
  • T. Pelissier et al.

    Heavy de novo methylation at symmetrical and non-symmetrical sites is a hallmark of RNA-directed DNA methylation

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (1999)
  • A.L. Jones et al.

    De novo methylation and co-suppression induced by a cytoplasmically replicating plant RNA virus

    EMBO J

    (1998)
  • P.L. Jones et al.

    Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription

    Nat Genet

    (1998)
  • R. van Blokland et al.

    Condensation of chromatin in transcriptional regions of an inactivated plant transgene: evidence for an active role of transcription in gene silencing

    Mol Gen Genet

    (1997)
  • J.A. Jeddeloh et al.

    Maintenance of genomic methylation requires a SWI2/SNF2-like protein

    Nat Genet

    (1999)
  • T. Elmayan et al.

    Expression of single copies of a strongly expressed 35S transgene can be silenced post-transcriptionally

    Plant J

    (1996)
  • M. Stam et al.

    Plant J

    (1997)
  • Mittelstein et al.

    Gene inactivation in Arabidopsis thaliana is not accompanied by an accumulation of repeat-induced point mutations

    Mol Gen Genet

    (1994)
  • F. de Carvalho Niebel et al.

    Post-transcriptional cosuppression of beta-1,3-glucanase genes does not affect accumulation of transgene nuclear mRNA

    Plant Cell

    (1995)
  • K.Y. Lee et al.

    Post-transcriptional gene silencing of ACC synthase in tomato results from cytoplasmic RNA degradation

    Plant J

    (1997)
  • H. Holtorf et al.

    Stochastic, and nonstochastic post-transcriptional silencing of chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase genes involves increased RNA turnover-possible role for ribosome-independent RNA degradation

    Plant Cell

    (1999)
  • J.J. Jacobs et al.

    Post-transcriptional beta-1,3-glucanase gene silencing involves increased transcript turnover that is translation-independent

    Plant J

    (1997)
  • G.J. van Eldik et al.

    Silencing of beta-1,3 glucanase genes in tobacco correlates with an increased abundance of RNA degradation intermediates

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (1998)
  • J.C. Palauqui et al.

    Systemic acquired silencing: transgene-specific post-transcriptional silencing is transmitted by grafting from silenced stocks to non-silenced scions

    EMBO J

    (1997)
  • Cited by (95)

    • A Dicer2 from Scylla paramamosain activates JAK/STAT signaling pathway to restrain mud crab reovirus

      2022, Developmental and Comparative Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      RNA interference (RNAi) is a conserved eukaryotic gene silencing mechanism elicited by double stranded RNA (dsRNA), and works at both the transcriptional and the post-transcriptional levels (Cogoni and Macino, 1999; Fire et al., 1998; Kennerdell and Carthew, 1998; Svoboda et al., 2000).

    • Identification and functional characterization of Dicer2 and five single VWC domain proteins of Litopenaeus vannamei

      2011, Developmental and Comparative Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      RNA interference (RNAi) is a conserved eukaryotic gene silencing mechanism that works at both the transcriptional and the post-transcriptional levels (Cogoni and Macino, 1999; Fire et al., 1998; Kennerdell and Carthew, 1998; Svoboda et al., 2000).

    • THE ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF FUNGAL VIRUSES

      2021, Studies in Viral Ecology: Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text