Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume 6, Issue 10, 1 October 2002, Pages 416-421
Journal home page for Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Opinion
Degeneracy and cognitive anatomy

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01976-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Cognitive models indicate that there are multiple ways of completing the same task. This implicit degeneracy cannot be revealed by functional imaging studies of normal subjects if more than one of the sufficient neural systems is activated. Nor can it be detected by neuropsychological studies of patients because their performance might not be impaired when only one degenerate system is damaged. We propose that degenerate sets of sufficient neural systems can only be identified by an iterative approach that integrates the lesion-deficit model and functional imaging studies of normal and neurologically damaged subjects.

Section snippets

The lesion-deficit model

Until the first PET studies of language processing were reported [10], the primary method for establishing cognitive anatomy was the lesion-deficit model. The principle behind this approach is that if a physiological lesion results in a cognitive deficit, then part of the lesioned area must be necessary for the lost cognitive process. Throughout the last century several methodological developments enabled the lesion-deficit approach in humans. Delineation of permanent (pathophysiological and

Functional imaging studies of normal subjects

It is generally assumed that functional imaging techniques will overcome many of the limitations associated with the lesion-deficit model. The main advantages that functional imaging offers are that it can identify the set of regions that are engaged for one task relative to another and it is not limited to ‘lesioned’ cortex. For example, when normal subjects are instructed to match written words on the basis of their meaning, they activate a distributed set of areas (the semantic-retrieval

Combining the lesion-deficit approach with functional imaging studies of normal subjects

Functional imaging can, in principle, identify the set of regions that are sufficient for a cognitive operation and the lesion-deficit model identifies which of these areas are necessary. We have previously argued 24., 25. that a combination of functional imaging and the lesion-deficit model should enable us to identify ‘necessary and sufficient’ brain systems. We were wrong – there might be no single necessary and sufficient system because the existence of two or more degenerate systems that

Motivation for functional imaging studies of neurologically damaged patients

We have argued that functional imaging results can be used to guide neuropsychological investigations and that neuropsychological investigations can be used to test predictions generated from functional imaging data. It is possible, however, that the ability to complete the task might not be impaired following any combination of lesions to areas activated in functional imaging studies of normal subjects. This could occur if there are latent systems that are either untrained or ‘inhibited’ in

Conclusion

In this article we have discussed the concept of degeneracy at the level of cognitive anatomy. The key point is that a full understanding of the degenerate sets of neural systems that underlie any given cognitive task can only be revealed by systematically combining data from neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies of normal subjects and neurological patents (see Fig. 6). We believe that an understanding of degeneracy will provide insights into intersubject variability and the mechanisms

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust. The data reported in Fig. 3, Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 were collected by C.J.P. and co-workers, and originally reported in a different format in Rik Vandenberghe et al. [22] and Cath Mummery et al. [23].

References (30)

  • G.W. Humphreys et al.

    Routes to object constancy: implications from neurological impairments of object constancy

    Q. J. Exp. Psychol.

    (1984)
  • G. Hinton et al.

    Learning and relearning in Boltzman machines

  • J. McClelland

    Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex–Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1995)
  • S.E. Petersen

    Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single word processing

    Nature

    (1988)
  • W. Penfield et al.

    Speech and Brain Mechanism

    (1959)
  • Cited by (356)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text