Elsevier

The Leadership Quarterly

Volume 10, Issue 2, Summer 1999, Pages 219-256
The Leadership Quarterly

Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: Are attributes of charismatic/transformational leadership universally endorsed?1

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00018-1Get rights and content

Abstract

This study focuses on culturally endorsed implicit theories of leadership (CLTs). Although cross-cultural research emphasizes that different cultural groups likely have different conceptions of what leadership should entail, a controversial position is argued here: namely that attributes associated with charismatic/transformational leadership will be universally endorsed as contributing to outstanding leadership. This hypothesis was tested in 62 cultures as part of the Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) Research Program. Universally endorsed leader attributes, as well as attributes that are universally seen as impediments to outstanding leadership and culturally contingent attributes are presented here. The results support the hypothesis that specific aspects of charismatic/transformational leadership are strongly and universally endorsed across cultures.

Section snippets

Leadership and perception: implicit leadership theories

Leadership exists in all societies and is essential to the functioning of organizations within societies (Wren, 1995). Because individuals have their own ideas about the nature of leaders and leadership, they develop ideosyncratic theories of leadership. As such, an individual's implicit leadership theory refers to beliefs held about how leaders behave in general and what is expected of them (Eden & Leviatan, 1975). Using an information processing perspective, implicit theories are cognitive

Leadership perceptions across cultures

The way in which the social environment is interpreted is strongly influenced by the cultural background of the perceiver. This implies that the attributes that are seen as characteristic or prototypical for leaders may also strongly vary in different cultures. Hunt, Boal, and Sorensen (1990) propose that societal culture has an important impact on the development of super-ordinate category prototypes and implicit leadership theories. They hold that values and ideologies act as a determinant of

Studying leadership in different cultures

Yukl (1998) points out that most of the research on leadership during the past half century was conducted in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe. Hofstede (1993)(p.81) states: “In a Global perspective, US management theories contain a number of idiosyncrasies not necessarily shared by management elsewhere. Three such idiosyncrasies are mentioned: A stress on market processes, a stress on the individual, and a focus on managers rather than workers.” Similarly, House (1995) notes that

Leadership prototypes across cultures

Relatively few studies have focused explicitly on culture-based differences in leadership prototypes or implicit theories of leadership. Since implicit leadership theory, with its core construct of “leadership prototypes,” has been found useful in understanding leader behavior in the United States, there seems no reason why this would not also be found in other countries. Bryman (1987), for instance, found strong support for the operation of implicit theories of leadership in Great Britain.

Lord

Charismatic leadership and societal culture

Is charisma universally endorsed? One proposition is that differences in national culture could influence the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leaders. Managerial practices and motivational techniques that are legitimate and acceptable in one culture (or time period) may not be in another. Bass (1990a)(p. 196) states: “Charismatics appear in societies with traditions of support for them and expectations about their emergence.” This seems to imply charismatic leadership might easily

The culture specific–etic dilemma

Cross-cultural researchers make a distinction between culture-specific and cross-culturally generalizable or universal aspects of behavior. Pike (1967) used the terms emic and etic in analogy with phonetics (general aspects of vocal sounds and sound production in languages) and phonemics (sounds used in a particular language). Berry (1969) transferred Pike's distinction to cross-cultural psychology, using the term “etic” analyses of human behavior for those that focus on universals. Thus, etic

Types of universals: simple versus variform

The discussion of culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable elements could also be phrased in terms of different types of universals. A first type of universal that has been identified is the simple universal, referring to a phenomenon that is constant throughout the world. In terms of statistical inference, such simple universals focus on the mean level of a variable and the extent to which that mean doesn't vary across cultures (e.g., Bass 1997, Hanges et al. 1997). However, the

Cultural influences on leadership: project globe

The idea for a global research program concerned with leadership and organizational practices was conceived in the summer of 1991 by Robert House and GLOBE was funded in October 19932. Since then, GLOBE has evolved into a multi-phase, multi-method research

Sample

Sampling is a problematic issue in cross-cultural studies. As has been noted in cross-cultural research, using national borders as cultural boundaries may not be appropriate in countries that have large subcultures. In large, multi-cultural countries such as India, the U.S. and China it is not even clear which sample would be most representative. Nevertheless, the samples from all countries need to be relatively homogeneous within countries. In this study, for multi-culture countries, whenever

Leadership Dimensions

Table 4 presents the descriptive statistics of the global leadership (i.e., second order) dimensions. The country means on the charismatic/transformational, team oriented, and participative leadership dimension range from 4.51 to 6.46 on a 7 point scale, indicating a general belief that these dimensions are prototypical of outstanding leadership in all cultures. Country means on these six second order leadership factors and sample sizes are shown in Table 5.

Universally Endorsed Attributes

To be seen as universally endorsed,

Enacting charismatic/transformational leadership: examples from the globe study

The results presented above show that several attributes associated with charismatic/transformational leadership are universally seen as contributing to outstanding leadership. A common preference for this type of leadership does not preclude differences in the observed ratings of actual leader behavior. In other words, a shared preference for transformational/ charismatic leadership does not mean transformational/charismatic attributes will be enacted in exactly the same manner across cultures

Top-management versus lower hierarchical levels

The second issue that will be discussed in some more depth concerns the issue of how CLTs may vary according to managerial level. As stated previously, when middle managers rate characteristics for effective leadership they are most likely thinking of top management. However, `the perceptual processes that operate with respect to leaders are very likely to involve quite different considerations at upper versus lower hierarchical levels' (Lord & Maher, 1991, p.97). As demands, tasks and

Discussion

The combined results of the major GLOBE study and the follow-up study demonstrate that several attributes reflecting charismatic/transformational leadership are universally endorsed as contributing to outstanding leadership. These include motive arouser, foresight, encouraging, communicative, trustworthy, dynamic, positive, confidence builder, and motivational. Several other charismatic attributes are perceived as culturally contingent. These include enthusiastic, risk taking, ambitious,

References (92)

  • K.B. Lowe et al.

    Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadershipa meta-analytic review

    Leadership Quarterly

    (1996)
  • M.F. Peterson et al.

    International perspectives on international leadership

    Leadership Quarterly

    (1997)
  • M.C. Rush et al.

    Implicit leadership theoryA potential threat to the validity of leader behavior questionnaires

    Organizational Behavior and Human Performance

    (1977)
  • B. Shamir

    Social distance and charismatheoretical notes and an exploratory study

    Leadership Quarterly

    (1995)
  • B. Shamir et al.

    The rhetoric of charismatic leadershipa theoretical extension, a case study and implications for research

    Leadership Quarterly

    (1994)
  • F.J. Yammarino et al.

    Transformational leadership and performanceA longitudinal investigation

    Leadership Quarterly

    (1993)
  • Ashkenasy, N. M., & Falkus, S. (in progress) The Australian enigma. In R. J. House & J. Chhokar, J (Eds.), Cultures of...
  • B.M. Bass

    Leadership and performance beyond expectations

    (1985)
  • B.M. Bass

    Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications

    (1990)
  • B.M. Bass

    EditorialToward a meeting of minds

    Leadership Quarterly

    (1990)
  • B.M. Bass

    A new paradigm of leadershipAn inquiry into transformational leadership

    (1996)
  • B.M. Bass

    Does the transactional–transformational paradigm transcend organizationaland national boundaries?

    American Psychologist

    (1997)
  • B.M. Bass et al.

    Potential biases in leadership measureshow prototypes, leniency and general satisfaction relate to ratings and rankings of transformational and transactional leadership constructs

    Educational and Psychological Measurement

    (1989)
  • B.M. Bass et al.

    The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women

    Applied Psychology: An International Review

    (1996)
  • J.W. Berry

    On cross-cultural comparability

    International Journal of Psychology

    (1969)
  • N. Boyacigiller et al.

    The parochial dinosaurOrganizational science in a global context

    Academy of Management Review

    (1991)
  • A. Bryman

    The generalizability of leadership theory

    Journal of Social Psychology

    (1987)
  • A. Bryman

    Charisma and Leadership in organizations

    (1992)
  • J.M. Burns

    Leadership

    (1978)
  • Chhokar, J. S. (in progress). Leadership and culture in India: The GLOBE research project. In R. J. House & J. Chhokar...
  • J.A. Conger

    The Charismatic LeaderBehind the Mystique of Exceptional Leadership

    (1989)
  • Den Hartog, D. N. (1997). Inspirational leadership. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. KLI doctoral dissertations series,...
  • Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Van Muijen, J. J. (1998). Implicit theories of leadership at different...
  • D.N. Den Hartog et al.

    Transactional versus transformational leadershipAn analysis of the MLQ

    Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology

    (1997)
  • L. Donaldson

    American anti-management theories of organization

    (1995)
  • P.W. Dorfman

    International and Cross-Cultural Leadership Research

  • Dorfman, P.W. & Ronen, S. (1991). The universality of leadership theories: Challenges and paradoxes. Paper presented at...
  • D. Eden et al.

    Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1975)
  • Erez, M. (1994). Toward a model of cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. In H. C. Triandis, M. D....
  • A. Etzioni

    A comparative analysis of complex organisations

    (1961)
  • C.M. Fiol et al.

    Charismatic LeadershipStrategies for effecting social change

    Leadership Quarterly.

    (1999)
  • Fu, P. P. (in progress). Chinese leadership and culture. In R. J. House & J. Chhokar (Eds.), Cultures of the world, A...
  • J.B. Fuller et al.

    A quantitative review of research on charismatic leadership

    Psychological Reports

    (1996)
  • D.A. Gioia et al.

    On avoiding the influence of implicit leadership theories in leader behavior descriptions

    Educational and Psychological Measurement

    (1985)
  • Hanges, P. J., Dickson, M. W., & Lord, R. G. (1997). Trends, developments and gaps in cross-cultural research on...
  • Hanges, P. J., House, R. J., Dickson, M. W., Dorfman, P. W., et al. (under review). The development and validation of...
  • Cited by (756)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    The first five authors participated in the statistical analyses and the writing of this monograph. The Senior Research Associates provided general research support to the Principal Investigator and the GLOBE Coordinating Team, assisted country representatives in translation and back-translations of instruments and in data collection, and assisted in the coordination of the GLOBE data collection. The remaining authors represented their cultures as Country Co-Investigators, made suggestions concerning the design and execution of the GLOBE program, collected the data on which this monograph is based, and provided interpretations of research findings in their respective cultures.

    View full text