The current model of short interspersed nuclear element (SINE) mobility suggests that these non-coding retroposons are able to recruit for their own benefits the enzymatic machinery encoded by autonomous long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs). The recent characterization of potential SINE-LINE partner pairs that share common 3′ end sequences concurs with this model and has led to a potent picture of tRNA-derived SINEs consisting of a tripartite functional structure (Mol. Cell. Biol. 16 (1996) 3756; Mol. Biol. Evol. 16 (1999) 1238; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 2869). This structure consist of a 5′ polIII tRNA-related promoter region, a central conserved domain and a variable 3′ region with homology to the 3′ end of LINEs, believed to be essential to direct recognition by the LINE proteins. To test this model in vivo, we have designed synthetic SINEs possessing this ‘canonical’ structure, including 3′ homology to the 3′ UTR of the LINE I factor from Drosophila. These synthetic elements were introduced in a Drosophila reactive strain, and SINE retroposition was assessed following dysgenic crosses that are known to induce high levels of I factor germinal transposition. In the progeny from the dysgenic crosses 3400–4000 flies were analyzed but no retroposed copy of the chimeric SINEs was detected, indicating that what is assumed to be a typical SINE structure is not sufficient per se to allow efficient trans-mobilization of our synthetic SINEs by an actively amplifying partner LINE. Alternatively, the apparent absence of natural fly SINEs may underline intrinsic properties of fly biology that are incompatible with the genesis and/or propagation of SINE-like elements.