Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 45, Issue 5, September 1997, Pages 761-771
Social Science & Medicine

Comparing measures of health inequality

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00412-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Several methods are available to measure social inequalities in health. This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches, in particular the odds ratio, the slope and alpha. These methods are illustrated using data from subjects in the 1958 British birth cohort. The inequality measures are compared using health status at ages 23 and 33. Six health indicators are examined, including self-rated health, limiting long-standing illness, psychological health, respiratory symptoms, asthma and obesity. Two social indicators are compared, namely class at birth and educational qualifications. Conclusions do not differ substantially using the three methods for measuring inequality. However, consistent differences were evident between the measures of social position, with greater inequalities apparent for educational qualifications. Choice of social indicator therefore appears to be of primary importance in measuring health inequality.

References (71)

  • D. Vagero et al.

    Health inequalities in Britain and Sweden

    Lancet

    (1989)
  • A. Wagstaff et al.

    On the measurement of inequalities in health

    Social Science & Medicine

    (1991)
  • P. West

    Inequalities? Social class differentials in health in British youth

    Social Science & Medicine

    (1988)
  • A. Agresti

    Generalized odds ratio for ordinal data

    Biometrics

    (1980)
  • A. Agresti

    Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data

    (1984)
  • A. Agresti

    Categorical Data Analysis

    (1990)
  • S. Arber

    Social class, non-employment, and chronic illness: continuing the inequalities in health debate

    British Medical Journal

    (1987)
  • S. Arber et al.

    Gender and later life: a sociological analysis of resources and constraints

  • B.G. Armstrong et al.

    Ordinal regression models for epidemiologic data

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (1989)
  • Y.M.M. Bishop et al.

    Discrete Multivariate Analysis

    (1975)
  • M. Blaxter

    Health and Lifestyles

    (1990)
  • I.D.J. Bross

    How to use ridit analysis

    Biometrics

    (1958)
  • N.R. Butler et al.

    Perinatal Mortality

    (1963)
  • E. Dahl

    Social inequalities in ill-health: the significance of occupational status, education and income—results from a Norwegian survey

    Sociology of Health and Illness

    (1994)
  • R. Davie et al.

    From Birth to Seven

    (1975)
  • A.W.F. Edwards

    The measure of association in a 2 × 2 table

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A

    (1963)
  • A. Fielding

    Scoring functions for ordered classifications in statistical analysis

    Quality and Quantity

    (1993)
  • J.L. Fleiss

    Statistical Analysis for Rates and Proportions

    (1981)
  • Z. Gilula

    Grouping and association in two-way contingency tables: A canonical correlation analytic approach

    Journal of the American Statistical Association

    (1986)
  • L.A. Goodman

    Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classification having ordered categories

    Journal of the American Statistical Association

    (1979)
  • L.A. Goodman

    Association models and canonical correlation in the analysis of cross-classifications having ordered categories

    Journal of the American Statistical Association

    (1981)
  • L.A. Goodman et al.

    Measures of association for cross classification

    Journal of the American Statistical Association

    (1954)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text