The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions
Introduction
Motor imagery is a dynamic state in which an individual mentally simulates the performance of a specific motor action or motor task. [2], [4], [9]. Studies using positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging find that similar brain areas are activated when subjects either perform a motor task or imagine performing the same task. This suggests that common neurocognitive networks subserve motor imagery and the intentional generation of overt motor movements [2], [6], [11], [12]. Behavioural studies also demonstrate that imagined motor performance is subject to the same environmental and physiological constraints as real motor performance [2], [5], [6], [16]. For example, the time to complete motor movements in imagination is highly correlated with the time necessary to actually perform the same movements in both normal subjects and in subjects with movement disorders arising from focal brain lesions or neurodegenerative disorders [2], [5], [6], [7], [11], [16], [19], [20].
A recent dissociation between the timing and duration of imagined movements [6] suggests that imagined movements may be assembled using different force, timing and sequencing components in the same way as real movements are assembled [10], [13], [14], [15]. In the Decety et al. study [6], a high correlation was found between the duration required to actually walk different pre-specified distances and the duration required to imagine walking the same distances. When the same task was repeated with subjects shouldering a 25-kg rucksack, the duration of real movements was unchanged while a systematic slowing of imagined movements was observed. It was hypothesised that this slowing occurred because subjects programmed a greater muscle force in order to overcome the additional weight when moving. When subjects actually walked, this additional force allowed subjects to maintain the same speed carrying the weight as when they carried no weight. However, as increases in force are generally associated with increased movement duration, the additional force programmed when subjects imagined walking with the weight was interpreted as representing that the duration of their movements should be increased [1], [6]. Importantly, despite this increase in duration, the relationship between real and imagined movements remained proportional. Thus, the weight disrupted the calculation of the force component of imagined movements but not the relative timing. These data suggest that motor imagery cannot be considered a fully formed and irreducible motor representation akin to a motor memory.
Before this hypothesis can be explored further, a number of criticisms that have been made of the Decety et al. [6] study must be addressed. First, as the subjects were blindfolded during the experiment their performance may reflect changes in memory function, or in their visual-spatial representation of the space rather than, or in addition to, any internal representations of the motor task [8]. Second, if the weight was attached to the limbs of subjects rather than placed on their back, then real movements may have been slowed in the same manner as imagined movements [1]. Finally, as subjects were blindfolded, they may not have increased imagined effort in the blindfolded condition because, in the absence of movement, visual feedback may be necessary for adjusting effort [3]. If true, these criticisms cast doubt on the hypothesis that internal representations of imagined motor performance and actual motor performance are assembled from the same component processes. However, all of these criticisms can be rejected if it can be demonstrated that motor imagery is still slowed with additional weight when subjects are not blindfolded in the imagery task and the external load is attached to a limb. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate real and imagined performance on the visually guided pointing task under conditions where an external load was and was not applied to the limb performing the task.
It was hypothesised that the external weight would slow the duration of imagined but not real movements although the external load would not effect the logarithmic relationship between target width and the duration of either real or imagined movements.
Section snippets
Subjects
The subjects consisted of two male and six female subjects. Ages ranged from 20 to 29 years (mean age=23.0 years, S.D.=3.0 years). All eight subjects were classified as right-hand dominant according to their score on the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI) [18]. No subject reported a history of neurological or psychiatric illness, and subjects gave informed consent before participating.
Apparatus and design
The visually guided pointing task was used to measure movement durations for real and imagined movements.
Results
Fig. 1 shows the relationship between mean movement duration and target width for real and imaginary movements in the no-load and load conditions. Table 1 indicates that for all four experimental conditions, the logarithmic regression gave the best fit of the data for both actual and imagined movements. Once target width had been converted to item difficulty, ANOVA indicated significant main effects item difficulty (F(9,63)=25.57, P<0.001) ), condition (F(1,7)=90.67, P<0.001) and load (F
Discussion
The current results suggest that force and timing components of imagined movements are assembled independently and immediately in response to current task demand characteristics. This independence is shown when a weight is attached to the limb that individuals imagine moving when performing a motor sequencing task. Under these conditions, the duration of imagined movements is slowed significantly compared with conditions in which a weight is attached to the limb actually performing a motor
References (20)
Motor imagery: never in your wildest dreams
Trends Neurosci.
(1997)The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery
Behav. Brain Res.
(1996)- et al.
The timing of mentally represented actions
Behav. Brain Res.
(1989) - et al.
Motor imagery of a lateralised sequential task is asymmetrically slowed in hemi-Parkinson’s patients
Neuropsychologia
(1995) Mental imagery in the motor context
Neuropsychologia
(1995)- et al.
Asymmetries between dominant and non-dominant hands in real and imagined motor task performance
Neuropsychologia
(1999) Temporal representation in the control of movement
Behav. Brain Sci.
(1994)- et al.
Mental simulation and motor imagery
Philosophy Sci.
(1996) - et al.
Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitt's law hold in motor imagery?
Behav. Brain Res.
(1996) - et al.
Visual-spatial movement goals
Behav. Brain Sci.
(1994)
Cited by (82)
TMS over dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects the timing of motor imagery but not overt action: Further support for the motor-cognitive model
2023, Behavioural Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :However, other studies observed numerous discrepancies between imagined and overt actions. For example, imagined movements can take either less time [57–60], or more time [11,12,48,57,60–66], than their overt counterparts. Further, macroscopic elements of imagined and overt movements may sometimes differ [67].
Muscle activation in semantic processing: An electromyography approach
2020, Biological PsychologyThe action-specific effect of execution on imagination of reciprocal aiming movements
2017, Human Movement ScienceCitation Excerpt :Most interestingly, motor imagery was impaired for the same movements which the patient had difficulties executing overtly. In neurotypical adults, Fitts’ speed-accuracy trade-off has consistently been shown in imagined pointing movements (Cerritelli, Maruff, Wilson, & Currie, 2000; Macuga, Papailiou, & Frey, 2012; Papaxanthis, Schieppati, Gentili, & Pozzo, 2002; Young, Pratt, & Chau, 2009) and, more recently, researchers have revealed accuracy-dependent activation of the right cerebellum and superior parietal lobule when imagining a Fitts’-type task (Lorey et al., 2010). These results provide evidence that Fitts’ law is present in imagined movements.
The ability of 6- to 8-year-old children to use motor imagery in a goal-directed pointing task
2015, Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyCitation Excerpt :Task difficulty is manipulated via systematic manipulation of target width and/or target distance. Consequently, Fitts’ tasks are frequently used within the mental chronometry paradigm to study the effect of systematically manipulating task difficulty on actual and imagined movement performance (Cerritelli et al., 2000; Choudhury et al., 2007; Wilson, Maruff, Ives, & Currie, 2001). Participants perform repetitive pointing movements toward a series of targets both by actually performing these movements and by imagining these movements.
Incomplete inhibition of central postural commands during manual motor imagery
2015, Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :Also, as expected, increased loading of the arm increased the self-reported MTs both the physical and imagined arm movements. In previous work, this slowing effect of load seen in imagined movements has not always been found in physical movements (Cerritelli et al., 2000; Decety et al., 1989). Decety et al. (1989) originally proposed that lengthened MT of loaded imagined movements was representative of the greater muscular force required to move the heavier load.
Tensor decomposition-based channel selection for motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces
2023, Cognitive Neurodynamics