ExpresSed
Paleohydraulics of chute-and-pool structures in a Paleoproterozoic fluvial sandstone

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-0738(99)00013-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Chute-and-pool structures consist of an inclined surface leading into a pool where a hydraulic jump causes deposition of backset laminae. Structures fitting this description are present at the base of a very fine-grained sandstone bed in the fluvial Matinenda Formation of northern Ontario. Reconstruction of the paleohydraulic system indicates that a depth of approximately 1 cm and a velocity of approximately 65 cm/s formed these bedforms during the initial stage of a flow with increasing depth and decreasing velocity. This type of deposit should be most common at the base of sandy beds deposited as emergent bars are overtopped during increasing discharge events.

Introduction

Coarse-grained sandstones of the Matinenda Formation outcrop to the north of Lake Huron and form the basal clastic unit of the Huronian Supergroup. Braided, glacial outwash streams, with high width-to-depth ratios, deposited the sands in channels dominated by migration of dunes and transverse bars (Fralick and Miall, 1987, Fralick and Miall, 1989). A fining trend, from coarse- and very coarse-grained sands to fine- to coarse-grained sands occurs down paleoslope, to the southeast (Fralick, 1985; Fralick and Miall, 1989). An outcrop in the source-distal part of the outcrop area, at Denvic Lake (Fig. 1), contained bedforms morphologically similar to chute-and-pool structures described in the literature (Davies, 1890; Power, 1961; Jopling and Richardson, 1966; Schmincke et al., 1973). In the experiments of Jopling and Richardson (1966)the flow passed down a chute, where it constantly accelerated and decreased in depth. This led to the development of a hydraulic jump where the Froude Number (Fr) dropped below 1. Immediately downstream from the jump a series of steeply dipping backset laminae were deposited. The process necessitates the morphology of an inclined ramp (chute) with a series of backset laminae at its base (pool). This configuration typifies the structures in the study outcrop (Fig. 2A–C).

Two beds are present in this glacially polished outcrop: an underlying coarse-grained, white sandstone, which is a minimum of 1 m thick, and an overlying tan, very fine-grained sandstone, which is at least 1.5 m thick. Five chute-and-pool structures are present along the contact between the two units.

Section snippets

Vertical sequence of sedimentary structures

The chute-and-pool structures are formed on the eroded surface of the underlying coarse-grained sandstone (Fig. 2A–C). Laminae filling the pools dip upstream (Fig. 3) and are composed of discrete layers of very fine-grained and coarse-grained sand. Similarities in grain size and mineralogy between the underlying bed and the coarser laminae indicate that the former was probably the source. The sand in the very fine-grained laminae is similar to the overlying sand.

A microdelta overlies the basal,

Paleohydraulics

Bedform stability diagrams can be used to infer the range of velocity and depth which formed the ripples and dune. Both structures were created by the same flow, the grain size defining the bedform which developed. Bedform stability diagrams of depth vs. velocity for the two grain sizes present indicate that average flow depth was between 3 and 27 cm and velocity was between 32 and 60 cm/s. The lower depth represents the minimum average depth needed to cover the dune.

Flow conditions at the

Discussion

Compiling the data on paleovelocity and paleodepth results in a pattern of slightly decreasing velocity combined with a more substantial depth increase as the bed was deposited (Fig. 4). The depositional event which formed the very fine-grained sand bed began with a very shallow flow of water over the coarse-grained sand. A series of hydraulic jumps eroded pools at the downward terminations of short, inclined segments of the bed. The pools were filled with upcurrent-dipping laminae of

Acknowledgements

Grateful appreciation is extended to Drs. A.V. Jopling and J.B. Southard for many helpful comments which improved earlier drafts of the manuscript. Figures were produced by Mr. S. Spivak and wordprocessing was carried out by Ms. W. Bourke and Ms. E. McDonald. This work was supported by Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada Operating Grants to Dr. A.D. Miall and Dr. P.W. Fralick.

References (21)

  • P.W. Fralick et al.

    Sedimentology of the Lower Huronian Supergroup (Early Proterozoic), Elliot Lake area, Ontario, Canada

    Sediment. Geol.

    (1989)
  • N. Panin et al.

    Regressive sand waves on the Black Sea shore

    Mar. Geol.

    (1967)
  • W.M. Davies

    Structure and origin of glacial sand planes

    Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.

    (1890)
  • Fralick, P.W., 1985. Early Proterozoic Basin Development on a Cratonic Margin: the Lower Huronian Supergroup of Central...
  • Fralick, P.W., Miall, A.D., 1987. Glacial outwash uranium placers? Evidence from the Lower Huronian Supergroup,...
  • B.M. Hand

    Antidunes as trochoidal waves

    J. Sediment. Petrol.

    (1969)
  • B.M. Hand et al.

    Antidunes in the Mount Toby conglomerate (Triassic) mass

    J. Sediment. Petrol.

    (1969)
  • A.V. Jopling

    Hydraulic factors controlling the shape of laminae in laboratory deltas

    J Sediment. Petrol.

    (1965)
  • A.V. Jopling

    Some principles and techniques used in reconstructing the hydraulic parameters of a paleo-flow regime

    J. Sediment. Petrol.

    (1966)
  • Jopling, A.V., 1969. Some techniques used in the hydraulic interpretation of fluvial and fluvio-glacial deposits. In:...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (25)

  • Distinct types of crevasse splays formed in the area of Middle Miocene mires, central Poland: Insights from geological mapping and facies analysis

    2023, Sedimentary Geology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The sediments originally developed as the principal Sp facies should also be interpreted in the same way as the upper part of splay III, that is, as a crevasse-splay microdelta which accumulated in a shallow lake in the backswamp area (Fig. 13A, B). The diagnostic features for such an interpretation are: i) the continuity of the Sp facies (often sigmoidal cross-stratification) over a distance of >700 m; ii) steeply dipping laminae at an angle of up to 25°; iii) the unimodal dipping direction of these laminae; and iv) the Sp facies forming the ‘tabular units of cross-bedding …’ (e.g., Jopling, 1965; Fralick, 1999) or ‘prograding splay deposits’ that are typical of delta foreset beds (e.g., Bristow et al., 1999; Michaelsen et al., 2000; Widera, 2011; Zieliński, 2014, Chomiak et al., 2019; Gruszka and Zieliński, 2021; and other references therein). Therefore, much more attention should be paid to the interpretation of deformation within the aforementioned splay microdelta (Table 3).

  • Standing waves in high speed lava channels: A tool for constraining lava dynamics and eruptive parameters

    2020, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the description of supercritical flows in Earth science disciplines is infrequent. In sedimentology, hydraulic jumps and the Froude number are used to explain the formation of particular bedforms such as antidunes or ‘chutes-and-pools’ (e.g., Fralick, 1999; Alexander et al., 2001; Lenzi, 2001; Duller et al., 2008; Macdonald et al., 2013; Cartigny et al., 2014). In volcanology, the deposition of breccia and lithics at slope breaks from pyroclastic density currents are often interpreted as the result of hydraulic jumps (e.g., Freundt and Schmincke, 1985; Roobol et al., 1987; Cole et al., 1998; Macías et al., 1998).

  • Supercritical-flow structures (backset-bedded sets and sediment waves) on high-gradient clinoform systems influenced by shallow-marine hydrodynamics

    2017, Sedimentary Geology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Bedforms and structures originating from supercritical flow conditions have been identified from a large range of present-day natural environments (Kostic et al., 2010), including rivers (e.g., Fralick, 1999; Fielding, 2006), glacial lake outburst flood successions (e.g., Gorrell and Shaw, 1991; Russell and Arnott, 2003; Russell et al., 2003; Hornung et al., 2007; Duller et al., 2008; Lang and Winsemann, 2013), high-angle clinoform delta wedges (e.g., Gobo et al., 2015), prodelta slopes (e.g., Hughes Clarke et al., 2014), and deep-water environments such as canyon floors and turbidite overbank areas, where they have mainly been observed and documented by means of bathymetric and high-resolution seismic data (e.g., Piper and Savoye, 1993; Wynn and Stow, 2002; Fildani et al., 2006, 2013; Lamb et al., 2008; Heiniö and Davies, 2009; Normark et al., 2009; Maier et al., 2011; Armitage et al., 2012; Gong et al., 2012; Covault et al., 2014; Zhong et al., 2015; Lang et al., 2017).

  • Lateral and vertical facies relationships of bedforms deposited by aggrading supercritical flows: From cyclic steps to humpback dunes

    2013, Sedimentary Geology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Field examples of deposits related to supercritical flows and hydraulic jumps are known from a variety of depositional environments, for example alluvial fans (Blair, 1999), beaches (Broome and Komar, 1979), deltas (Massari, 1996), fluvial and glacifluvial systems (Langford and Bracken, 1987; Alexander and Fielding, 1997; Fralick, 1999; Kjær et al., 2004; Fielding, 2006), ice-marginal subaqueous fans and deltas (Gorrell and Shaw, 1991; Brennand, 1994; Russell and Arnott, 2003; Johnsen and Brennand, 2004, 2006; Russell et al., 2007; Winsemann et al., 2009; Ghienne et al., 2010; Winsemann et al., 2011; Girard et al., 2012a,b; Hirst, 2012; Lang et al., 2012a), glacial lake-outburst flood deposits (Duller et al., 2008; Carling et al., 2009; Marren et al., 2009), subglacial lakes and cavities (Russell et al., 2003; Clerk et al., 2012), submarine fans (Walker, 1967; Hand et al., 1972; Weirich, 1988; Kostic and Parker, 2006; Postma et al., 2009; Cartigny et al., 2011) and volcaniclastic deposits (Schmincke et al., 1973).

  • Upper flow regime sheets, lenses and scour fills: Extending the range of architectural elements for fluvial sediment bodies

    2006, Sedimentary Geology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Chute and pool structures are virtually unknown from fluvial strata owing to their presumed low preservation potential, and indeed most published examples of chute and pool structures come from the deposits of explosive volcanic eruptions, such as the spectacular Pleistocene section at Laacher See, Germany (Schmincke et al., 1973). The sole, published ancient example of chute and pool structure known to the author is a series of small-scale structures from Precambrian rocks in Canada (Fralick, 1999). Here, another, larger-scale bedset of interpreted chute and pool origin is described from the Permian of central Queensland, Australia, and a further, possible example from the Shepody Formation of Nova Scotia is provided.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text