Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 72, Issues 1–2, January–February 2001, Pages 129-139
Physiology & Behavior

Do Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) synchronize their estrous cycles?

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00395-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Estrous synchrony was tested using 10 pairs of sibling female rats (Rattus norvegicus). A Monte Carlo bootstrap simulation was used to construct random control groups to avoid previous statistical errors and to test for significance when there are irregular cycles. The 10 pairs of females did not exhibit estrous synchrony. The effect of cycle irregularity on the limits of synchrony was analyzed using an equation that the related degree of cycle regularity to the degree of synchrony. This equation significantly predicted the limits of synchrony: cycle irregularity limits both the maximum and minimum degree of synchrony that can occur between two females. Finally, simulations of the expected levels of synchrony in groups of five rats were compared to the original study on estrous synchrony. The simulations indicated that the results of the original study were consistent with chance levels of synchrony. It is concluded that there is no evidence that Norway rats synchronize their estrous cycles. Evolutionary implications are discussed.

Section snippets

Subjects

Twenty non-mated Sprague–Dawley female rats (five groups of four sisters) were used; born and bred at Indiana University from stock originally obtained from Taconic (Germantown, NY). Animals were housed in standard polypropylene maternity cages (48×20×26 cm) and provided with food and water ad libitum. Colony rooms were maintained at 24°±2°C and illuminated from 08:00 to 20:00 hours.

The females came from litters that were culled to four females and four males at 3 days of age (day of birth is

Results

The level of synchrony from the first closest pair to the last closest pair remained the same (mean difference in days=0.8, both at the beginning and end, t=0, df=9, P=1, two-tailed; see Fig. 1 for the estrous state matches). This implies that moving the females to another room and separating them into pairs did not affect their level of synchrony over the 48-day observation period. The degree of match between pairs of females also did not differ from chance (mean match=0.247, P>.62). Fig. 4

Discussion

No effect of synchrony was found, and the results were consistent with chance levels of synchrony. Failure to produce synchrony in a particular experiment does not disprove the phenomenon of synchrony. Indeed, one cannot rule out the possibility of a Type II error given the small expected effect size of synchrony previously reported [18], [34]. However, assessing the plausibility of a Type II error in this study requires a more detailed analysis of the phenomenon of synchrony in female rats.

Methods

For a pair of rats, deviations in cycle length away from 4-day cycles should be a predictor of the maximum degree of synchrony attainable by the pair. There are at least two types of deviations away from 4-day cycles that may predict these limits. First, the rat in a pair with the maximum frequency of non-4-day cycles (i.e., an irregularly cycling rat) should be negatively correlated with the maximum degree of match between the pair. Second, the absolute difference in the frequency of 4-day

Methods

In this study, vaginal smear classes were interpreted as estrous-cycle states (see Fig. 1). The original study [18], however, directly compared vaginal smear classes of females (i.e., L, LN, LC, N, NL, NC, C, CL, CN). Because the number of smear classes used was k=9, a match of two out of five animals on any given day may indicate a small but significant degree of synchrony.

Classifying the synchrony level of females according to smear class is a combinatorial matching problem, but simpler than

General discussion

This study failed to detect synchrony among pairs of sibling females that were housed together. There are several possible explanations for the failure to detect synchrony including the possibility of a Type II error. To assess the plausibility of a Type II error, further analysis of the phenomenon of estrous synchrony was performed. Because estrous synchrony among female Norway rats has been reported in only one other study [18], that study and the present study were necessarily the focus of

Acknowledgements

This work was initially supported by the Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior at Indiana University, Bloomington, and the theoretical development by NIH (through a subcontract with Indiana University) at the University of California, Davis. I thank two anonymous referees whose comments greatly improved the presentation of this material.

References (62)

  • DM Quadagno et al.

    The effects of males, athletic activities and all female living conditions on the menstrual cycle

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1981)
  • ME Pereira

    Asynchrony within estrous synchrony among ringtailed lemurs (Primates: Lemuridae)

    Physiol Behav

    (1991)
  • JC Schank

    Can pseudo entrainment explain the synchrony of estrous cycles among golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus)?

    Horm Behav

    (2000)
  • JC Schank

    Menstrual-cycle variability and measurement: further cause for doubt

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (2000)
  • JC Schank et al.

    Effects of male rat urine on reproductive and developmental parameters in the dam and her female offspring

    Horm Behav

    (2000)
  • JC Schank et al.

    A coupled-oscillator model of ovarian-cycle synchrony among female rats

    J Theor Biol

    (1992)
  • JC Schank et al.

    Ovulatory pheromone shortens ovarian cycles of female rats living in olfactory isolation

    Physiol Behav

    (1997)
  • WR Trevathan et al.

    No evidence for menstrual synchrony in lesbian couples

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1993)
  • A Weller et al.

    Menstrual synchrony in female couples

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1992)
  • A Weller et al.

    Menstrual synchrony between mothers and daughters and between roommates

    Physiol Behav

    (1993)
  • A Weller et al.

    The impact of social interaction factors on menstrual synchrony in the workplace

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1995)
  • A Weller et al.

    Examination of menstrual synchrony among women basketball players

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1995)
  • A Weller et al.

    Prolonged and very intensive contact may not be conducive to menstrual synchrony

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1998)
  • L Weller et al.

    Human menstrual synchrony: a critical assessment

    Neurosci Biobehav Rev

    (1993)
  • L Weller et al.

    Menstrual synchrony: agenda for future research

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1995)
  • L Weller et al.

    Menstrual variability and the measurement of menstrual synchrony

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1997)
  • L Weller et al.

    Menstrual synchrony in a sample of working women

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1999)
  • HC Wilson

    A critical review of menstrual synchrony research

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1992)
  • HC Wilson et al.

    Two studies of menstrual synchrony: negative results

    Psychoneuroendocrinology

    (1991)
  • MA Arden et al.

    The assessment of menstrual synchrony: comment on Weller and Weller

    J Comp Psychol

    (1998)
  • JG Calhoun

    The ecology and sociology of the Norway rat

    (1962)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Sex and Trait Anxiety Differences in Psychological Stress are Modified by Environment

      2018, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Prior to the onset of testing, female rats’ cycles were not synchronized. Schank (2001) reports that purposefully including all stages of estrous removes all “optimal stage” bias that may impact the behaviors being measured. In contrast to males, the females in our study showed sensitivity to AMPH by displaying greater activity in distance traveled.

    • Changes in the sexual behavior and testosterone levels of male rats in response to daily interactions with estrus females

      2014, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the rats (Ratus norvegicus) most commonly used in scientific studies have been domesticated for more than one hundred years [1], their physiology and behavior are still not fully understood. Although multi-day cycles in female rat hormonal levels that correspond with changes in sexual behavior are well documented [1–5], to our knowledge no one has previously described male hormonal levels and sexual behavior across consecutive days. Past experiments documenting the sexual behavior and hormonal levels of male rats have focused mainly on males that reach sexual exhaustion during one prolonged interaction with one or more females [6–9].

    • Chemosignals, hormones and mammalian reproduction

      2013, Hormones and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such an effect was reported for humans (Stern and McClintock, 1998) and has been inferred in earlier studies reporting synchrony in humans (Weller and Weller, 1993). However, other studies or re-analysis of previous studies, have found no evidence of cycle synchrony in humans (Schank, 2001b; Strassmann, 1999; Whitten, 1999; Wilson, 1987, 1992), non-human primates (chimpanzee: (Matsumoto-Oda et al., 2007); Mandrill: (Setchell et al., 2011); macaque (Furtbauer et al., 2011)), rats (Schank, 2001a) or hamsters (Schank, 2000). It might be that cycle synchrony occurs only in very restricted and contextually-specific circumstances (McClintock, 2002) but, on balance, the evidence suggests that ovarian synchrony does not exist as a biologically meaningful phenomenon (Schank, 2001b, 2006).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text