Elsevier

Clinical Radiology

Volume 53, Issue 9, September 1998, Pages 639-649
Clinical Radiology

Imaging of acute right lower abdominal quadrant pain

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(98)80290-0Get rights and content

This article reviews the clinical diagnosis of appendicitis, indications and options for appendiceal imaging, compares appendiceal CT techniques, and describes the imaging findings with appendicitis and alternative conditions that can clinically mimic appendicitis.

References (62)

  • BalthazarEJ et al.

    Appendicitis: Prospective evaluation with high-resolution CT

    Radiology

    (1991)
  • RaoPM et al.

    Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: Prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination

    Radiology

    (1997)
  • JeffreyRB et al.

    Acute appendicitis: High-resolution real-time US findings

    Radiology

    (1987)
  • AddisDG et al.

    The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States

    American Journal of Epidemiology

    (1990)
  • SimmenHP et al.

    Emergency room patients with abdominal pain unrelated to trauma: Prospective analysis in a surgical university hospital

    Hepato-Gastroenterology

    (1991)
  • DeutschA et al.

    Are some appendectomies unnecessary?

    Journal of the Royal College of Surgery Edinburgh

    (1983)
  • deDombalFT et al.

    Computer-aided diagnosis of acute abdominal pain

    British Medicine Journal

    (1972)
  • VelanovichV et al.

    Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: Implications for quality assurance

    American Surgery

    (1992)
  • NeutraR

    Indications for the surgical treatment of suspected acute appendicitis: a cost-effectiveness approach

  • RheaJT et al.

    Reducing the cost of caring for patients with clinically suspected appendicitis using a new, helical CT technique

    American Journal of Roentgenology

    (1997)
  • RaoPM et al.

    Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1998)
  • RaoPM et al.

    Helical CT scanning with only colon contrast material for imaging suspected appendicitis

    American Journal of Roentgenology

    (1997)
  • LaneMJ et al.

    Unenhanced helical CT for suspected appendicitis

    American Journal of Roentgenology

    (1997)
  • LeePWR

    The plain film in the acute abdomen: A surgeon's evaluation

    British Journal of Surgery

    (1976)
  • RaoPM et al.

    Helical CT incidence and characterization of appendoliths in 100 patients with appendicitis

    Emergency Radiology

    (1997)
  • RaoPM et al.

    Distal appendicitis: CT appearance and diagnosis

    Radiology

    (1997)
  • El FerzliG et al.

    Barium enema in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

    Surgery Gynecology and Obstetrics

    (1990)
  • SakoverRP et al.

    Frequency of visualization of the normal appendix with the barium enema examination

    American Journal of Roentgenology

    (1974)
  • HardingJA et al.

    Appendiceal filling by double-contrast barium enema

    Gastrointestinal Radiology

    (1986)
  • FedyshinP et al.

    Nonspecificity of barium enema findings in acute appendicitis

    American Journal of Roentgenology

    (1984)
  • Abu-yousefMM et al.

    Sonography of acute appendicitis: A critical review

    Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging

    (1989)
  • Cited by (69)

    • How to diagnose an acutely inflamed appendix; a systematic review of the latest evidence

      2017, International Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other smaller studies have yielded similar results [63,64]. Evidence has suggested USS should be the preferred imaging modality in children as well as pregnant and breast feeding women [65–69]. To increase the sensitivity of diagnosis and to avoid the radiation exposure of CT in equivocal cases, specific USS criteria and repeated USS scans have been adopted.

    • Appendiceal location analysis and review of the misdiagnosis rate of appendicitis associated with deep pelvic cecum on multidetector computed tomography

      2016, Clinical Imaging
      Citation Excerpt :

      Helical computed tomography (CT) and MDCT demonstrate sensitivity values of 90–100%, specificity values of 91–99%, positive predictive values of 92–98%, and negative predictive values of 95–100% for the diagnosis of appendicitis [2–4]. The reported false-negative rates for diagnosing acute appendicitis using MDCT are as high as 7% [5,6]. However, the misdiagnosis of appendicitis still occurs in atypical cases.

    • Symptom-based ultrasonography

      2014, Ultrasound Clinics
    • The effect of abdominal pain duration on the accuracy of diagnostic imaging for pediatric appendicitis

      2012, Annals of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite considerable efforts to develop and validate clinical scoring systems and decision rules, their performance is inadequate for clinical management.26-29 Thus, cross-sectional imaging with CT and ultrasonography has been studied and commonly used to improve the diagnostic evaluation of children with possible appendicitis.2,3,5,30-35 Although not the intent of the developers of the clinical scoring systems, recent adaptations recommend adjunctive imaging for indeterminate scores,26-28,36 and one decision rule was specifically created to limit CT use in low-risk patients.37

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text