Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 806, Issue 2, 28 September 1998, Pages 232-237
Brain Research

Research report
Genetic differences in morphine sensitivity, tolerance and withdrawal in rats

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00768-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Significant genetic differences in the endogenous opioid system and in response to a variety of noxious stimuli are present in rodents. We now compared the response to noxious heat with the hot plate test, morphine sensitivity and the development of tolerance and dependence to morphine in spontaneously hypertensive (SHR), Wistar–Kyoto (WK) and Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats. Significant differences were observed in basal nociception among the three strains, where SHRs were hypoalgesic compared to WK and SD. The antinociceptive effect of morphine varied among strains (SD>SHR>WK) as did the rate of tolerance development (10 mg/kg morphine 2/day for 4 days) where WK>SD=SHR. SHR rats developed hyperalgesia following morphine administration during the course of tolerance development. Furthermore, although naloxone (2 mg/kg) precipitated withdrawal symptoms in all tolerant rats, the panorama of symptoms varied among the three strains. Thus, there are significant genetic differences in a variety of effect of opiates.

Introduction

Considerable interindividual variability in the perception of noxious stimuli is characteristic of pain in humans. A number of possible mechanisms underlying these differences may exist, such as gender, cultural differences of pain expression, as well as differences in the endogenous pain modulating system [see Ref. [17]for review]. Among the latter, genetic differences may have important impacts on pain sensitivity and the response to analgesics. For example, humans that lack the genetic polymorphic cytochrome P4502D6 enzyme (CYP2D6) are poor metabolizers of opiates [1]and have increased response to tonically painful stimuli [23]. Another genetic factor that influences pain sensitivity is the presence of essential hypertension. Hypertensive humans have decreased pain ratings compared to normotensives [32]and normotensive offspring of hypertensive parents, who are at risk to develop hypertension later in life, also exhibit hypoalgesia in a number of experimental pain models [20].

A number of animal models of genetic differences in response to brief noxious stimuli that induce acute or tonic pain have been described in rodents, using inbred strains, selective breeding, spontaneous and targeted mutations 17, 21. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), which were selectively bred from the normotensive Wistar–Kyoto (WK) strain [19], exhibit increased nociceptive threshold in a number of test paradigms 14, 22, 24, 30, 31, 33. Furthermore, hypoalgesia has been observed in young SHR rats prior to the development of sustained elevation in blood pressure 14, 24. SHR rats have an elevated level of opioid binding sites in the CNS 7, 8, 12, 16, 31, 33. The involvement of the endogenous opioid system in abnormal pain sensitivity in SHR rats has been demonstrated since hypoalgesia was reversed by naloxone 22, 24.

Abnormal pain sensitivity involving genetic factors also seems to be a major factor in the development of chronic pain states. In humans a large number of painful neuropathic conditions appear to have a major hereditary component [6]. In animals genetic factors are also important in the development and expression of neuropathic pain states. In the Wistar-derived Sabra rat the propensity to perform autotomy, a behavioral sign of neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury, is inherited as a recessive trait, perhaps involving a single gene [5]. Furthermore, the hypoalgesic SHR rats demonstrated less pain-related behaviors following injury to both peripheral nerve [28]and spinal cord [29]compared to Sprague–Dawley (SD) and WK rats.

Sensitivity to morphine-induced analgesia is also under genetic control in both mice [17]and rats [27]. For example, Fischer rats have been found to be more sensitive to morphine than Lewis rats [27]and there are differences in brain dynorphin and enkephalin levels under basal conditions and during morphine tolerance and withdrawal in these strains [18]. Dark–Agouti rats, which lack the enzyme P4502D1 (CYP2D1), which is analogous to CYP2D6 in humans, demonstrate less antinociception in the tail flick test following administration of a number of opiate ligands, compared to SDs [4]. SHR rats have been found to be more sensitive to morphine than WK in the hot plate [25]and tail flick [3]tests. Interestingly, morphine-induced analgesia has been found to have a different genetic background than morphine-induced tolerance in both mice [13]and rats [27]. Thus, Fischer and Lewis rats developed morphine-induced tolerance at the same rate [27]as did Swiss Webster mice selectively bred for different sensitivity to morphine and stress-induced analgesia [13].

The aim of the present study was to compare the sensitivity of SHR, WK and SD rats to acute morphine administration and to compare the rate of development of morphine tolerance. We also examined the expression of dependence in the three rat strains.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

All experiments were carried out on male rats weighing 200 g at the start of the experiments. Three different strains were used: SD (B&K Universal, Sweden), WK (Möllegaard, Denmark) and SHR (Möllegaard). The studies were carried out with the approval of the local animal research ethics committee. The rats were housed in clear plastic cages, 5 rats per cage, with sawdust bedding, food and water available ad libitum, lights on between 0600 and 1800 h. The experiments were carried out between 0900

Thermal sensitivity and response to morphine

After training there was no difference in the baseline response latency of the SD and WK rats, but the SHRs were markedly hypoalgesic after both 10 (Fig. 1) and 6 (Fig. 2) days of training. The response latency after 10 days of training was significantly shorter than after 6 days for the SHRs (p<0.05). However, the relative hypoalgesia of the SHRs compared with SDs and WKs was maintained throughout the entire experiment. Both 5 and 10 mg/kg morphine caused significant antinociception, but

Discussion

The present results confirm that SHR rats are hyposensitive on the hot plate test compared to WK rats, from which they are derived 14, 24, 25. The SHRs are also hyposensitive compared with SDs. It should be noted that genetic differences in pain sensitivity may depend on the test used. For example, SHR rats have been found to have exaggerated response to subcutaneous formalin compared to WKs [26]. However, it is possible that this result may reflect genetic differences in the response of

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Swedish Medical Research Council (project 07913, The Biomed 2 Programme of the European Commission (project BMH4 CT95 0172), Astra Pain Control and research funds of the Karolinska Institute.

References (33)

Cited by (51)

  • Ovarian hormones, site-specific nociception, and hypertension

    2021, Features and Assessments of Pain, Anesthesia, and Analgesia
  • Stress-induced modulation of pain: Role of the endogenous opioid system

    2018, Progress in Brain Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    The functional consequence of such alterations in the opioid system underlying the phenotype of WKY rats is yet to be determined. In addition, WKY rats demonstrate hyporesponsivity to opioid drugs including morphine, buprenorphine, butorphanol, and nalbuphine in tests of acute thermal pain, suggesting that a dysfunction of the opioid system may underlie the WKY phenotype (Avsaroglu et al., 2007; Hoffmann et al., 1998; Plesan et al., 1999; Terner et al., 2003). Unlike SIA, very few studies have investigated the role of the endogenous opioid system in SIH in humans and the findings are rather inconclusive at this stage.

  • Pain, Blood Pressure, and Hypertension

    2016, The Neuroscience of Pain, Stress, and Emotion: Psychological and Clinical Implications
  • Adolescent opioid exposure in female rats: Transgenerational effects on morphine analgesia and anxiety-like behavior in adult offspring

    2011, Behavioural Brain Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    A number of mechanisms may underlie these sex differences, including differential distribution of μ-opioid receptors, estrogenic effects on endogenous opioid function, and sex differences in brain dopamine and/or glutamate systems [25,26,30,31]. Previous studies have also observed sex differences in the development of tolerance [32–34] although the data are somewhat mixed with some demonstrating enhanced morphine tolerance in males [30,32], others more rapid tolerance in females [35], and still others indicating no sex differences [36,37]. There is a rich body of literature detailing the impact of a variety of parameters on sex differences in morphine potency and tolerance, including the effects of the dosing regimen, the route of administration, the test used to measure analgesic response, and the strain of the animal.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text