Harvest in spring improves yield and quality of reed canary grass as a bioenergy crop
Abstract
Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) is a new bioenergy crop in Swedish agriculture. A new production method was tested where harvest is delayed until the following spring. Four harvest times combined with two nitrogen fertilization levels were studied between 1991 and 1995 in 10 field trials in Sweden. At the end of the growing season, the yield of reed canary grass averaged 8.5 ton DM/ha. In the following spring on average 7 ton DM/ha were harvested as a senescent dry crop. The amounts of plant nutrients removed with the harvested crop in spring were no more than half of the amounts removed with harvest in August. A large portion of the plant nutrients can thus be recirculated in the spring harvest system, which reduces fertilization costs. Concentrations of the undesired elements Cl and K were about 6 times lower in the spring harvest than in the August harvest. The important ash content was lower in the crop at spring harvest than in August, but varied with the soil conditions. The presented results show that a delayed harvest system for reed canary grass is beneficial for both biological production and use of the harvested material for energy purposes.
References (12)
- D. Smith
Carbohydrate reserves in grasses
- S. Andersson
Gräs för produktion av energiråvara. Art, kvävegödsling, skördetid
- M. Tuvesson
Kan vallgräs användas som energiråvara?
- M. Wik
Röflen, Phalaris arundinacea L.
Röbäcksdalen Meddelar
(1968) - G. Hadders
Fälttorkning av Gräs för Förbränning
(1989) - R. Olsson et al.
Sameldning Energigräs-torv—Miljö och Ekonomi
SLL report 63, Umeå
(1989)
Cited by (115)
Evaluation of harvest time effects on the combustion quality of warm- and cool-season perennial grasses in two contrasting semi-arid environments
2022, Industrial Crops and ProductsIn order to achieve economically viable and sustainable solid biofuel production from perennial grasses, high biomass productivity must be complemented by good combustion quality. The aim of this research was to compare the combustion quality of 7 cool-season perennial grasses, comprising bulbous canary grass, reed canary grass, smooth brome grass, orchard grass, tall wheatgrass, tall fescue, and perennial ryegrass, and 3 warm-season perennial grasses, comprising switchgrass, miscanthus, and giant reed, over 2 harvest times (autumn, winter/early spring) in 2 contrasting semi-arid environments (Adana, and Cankiri, Turkey). Delaying the harvest from the autumn to the winter or the spring significantly increased the lignin contents of each of the 3 warm-season grasses and generally decreased the contents of all of the minerals, except for Al and Fe, in miscanthus and switchgrass, and K and Na in giant reed, at both locations. Similar trends were also generally observed for all of the cool-season grasses, except for the orchard grass that was grown in Cankiri. Additionally, delayed harvest resulted in lower slagging tendency and sintering risk in all of the perennial grass species, except for giant reed in Cankiri. However, the autumn harvest caused significantly higher lignin, but generally lower N, P, K, Ca, S, Si, Al, and Fe contents, slagging tendency, and sintering risk in most of the cool-season grasses that were grown in Adana. On the other hand, despite the autumn harvest in Adana, and the spring harvest in Cankiri provided a substantial improvement in combustion quality of the cool-season grasses, mainly due to the reduced mineral and increased lignin contents, they still exhibited relatively lower combustion quality than miscanthus and switchgrass, especially in Adana. These results showed that further effort is needed to improve the combustion quality of cool-season grasses in order for them to be primary biomass feedstock alternatives for dry marginal lands of semi-arid environments.
New energy crops adapted to northern conditions of Europe can broaden the portfolio of agricultural based biofuel options in an area with currently few alternatives. This study evaluates two energy crops, giant knotweed (Fallopia sachalinensis var. ‘Igniscum’) and Virginia mallow (Sida hermaphrodita), as possible biomass feedstocks for biofuels in southern Finland. The collected data includes yield productivity, physical and chemical properties, and energy content. The dry matter yield of giant knotweed ranges from 5.41 odt·ha−1 to 27.67 odt·ha−1, whereas Virginia mallow ranges from 6.72 odt·ha−1 to 16.72 odt·ha−1. Pellets from both crops meet the requirements regarding standards. Giant knotweed presents a bulk density of 677.71 kg·m−3 and Virginia mallow 725.18 kg·m−3. The results of mechanical durability of giant knotweed do not exceed the minimum threshold of the standards, with 96.73 w-%, while Virginia mallow is 92.86 w-%. The analysis of the ash content results in 1.5% for giant knotweed and 2.19% for Virginia mallow. The quantities of chlorine (Cl) and sulphur (S) are below the recommended thresholds. Finally, the energy content with moisture content of 5 w-% of giant knotweed and Virginia mallow were 19.97 MJ·kg−1 and 19.68 MJ·kg−1, respectively. Both crops prove are valid alternatives in the climatic and soil conditions of Northern Europe.
Meta-analysis of leaf area index, canopy height and root depth of three bioenergy crops and their effects on land surface modeling
2021, Agricultural and Forest MeteorologyThe expected large-scale expansion of biofuel production in climate change mitigation scenarios calls for improvements in the representation of bioenergy crops in land surface models. Leaf area index (LAI), canopy height (CH) and root depth (RD) are key parameters that regulate exchanges of heat and moisture between land and atmosphere. This study performs a meta-analysis combining unique data from 34 observational studies and 14 countries to estimate monthly variability in LAI, CH, and RD of three main bioenergy crops: miscanthus (MSC), switchgrass (SWG), and reed canary grass (RCG). Using the Community Land Model v.5.0 and the results from the meta-analysis, we also tested the effects that variability in parameterization of LAI and CH have on key components of the surface energy budget, relative to prescribed values. Results from the meta-analysis show a strong seasonality of LAI and CH, with mean (± one standard error) LAI values at the peak summer month of 6.05 ± 0.84, 5.56 ± 0.75, and 5.39 ± 1.15 m2/m2, and maximum CH of 246 ± 23, 147 ± 16, and 156 ± 10 cm, for MSC, SWG, and RCG, respectively. These values are typically larger than the default parameterizations in CLM. Information on RD was limited and average values are 172 ± 56, 165 ±46, and 193 ± 11 cm, for MSC, SWG, and RCG, respectively. The seasonal cycles of latent heat, sensible heat and surface albedo are primarily affected by the range of LAI values, and less sensitive to variability in CH. Relative to the default values, higher LAI values increase latent heat and decrease sensible heat, with the highest absolute changes in summer. They also decrease surface albedo in winter months due to a larger snow masking effect. Our results offer a basis to compare experimental work and modelling studies, improve parameterization in land surface models, and identify the importance of vegetation structure parameters to evaluate key climate processes in response to bioenergy crops.
Comparison of cool and warm season perennial grasses for biomass yield, quality, and energy balance in two contrasting semiarid environments
2020, Biomass and BioenergyPerennial grasses are valuable biomass feedstocks due to their potentially high biomass yield and environmental benefits. This study aimed to compare 7 cool season: tall wheatgrass, bulbous canary grass, reed canary grass, tall fescue, perennial ryegrass, orchard grass, and smooth brome grass and 3 warm season perennial grasses: miscanthus, switchgrass, and giant reed for biomass yield, quality, and energy balance at 2 harvesting periods (autumn and winter to early spring) over 3 growing seasons in cold (Cankiri, Turkey) and warm (Adana, Turkey) semiarid environments. Harvests in winter and spring both led to considerable yield losses with all of the grass species in both locations, while it promoted biomass quality by reducing the moisture and ash contents of the warm season grasses in both locations, and the cool season grasses only in Cankiri. In contrast, autumn harvest provided significantly lower moisture and ash contents in the cool season grasses grown in Adana over the 3 years, where it was observed that, on average, giant reed exhibited the highest biomass productivity in both locations. Furthermore, bulbous canary grass and tall wheatgrass were found to be the most productive species in the study among the cool season grasses. Additionally, bulbous canary grass in Adana and tall wheatgrass in Cankiri achieved considerably higher energy ratios than the warm season grasses, mainly as a result of a lack of energy input for irrigation. In this sense, these 2 cool season grasses may be considered as alternative bioenergy crops in semiarid environments for sustainable biomass production.
Wetland buffer zones for nitrogen and phosphorus retention: Impacts of soil type, hydrology and vegetation
2020, Science of the Total EnvironmentWetland buffer zones (WBZs) are riparian areas that form a transition between terrestrial and aquatic environments and are well-known to remove agricultural water pollutants such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). This review attempts to merge and compare data on the nutrient load, nutrient loss and nutrient removal and/or retention from multiple studies of various WBZs termed as riparian mineral soil wetlands, groundwater-charged peatlands (i.e. fens) and floodplains. Two different soil types (‘organic’ and ‘mineral’), four different main water sources (‘groundwater’, ‘precipitation’, ‘surface runoff/drain discharge’, and ‘river inundation’) and three different vegetation classes (‘arboraceous’, ‘herbaceous’ and ‘aerenchymous’) were considered separately for data analysis. The studied WBZs are situated within the temperate and continental climatic regions that are commonly found in northern-central Europe, northern USA and Canada. Surprisingly, only weak differences for the nutrient removal/retention capability were found if the three WBZ types were directly compared. The results of our study reveal that for example the nitrate retention efficiency of organic soils (53 ± 28%; mean ± sd) is only slightly higher than that of mineral soils (50 ± 32%). Variance in load had a stronger influence than soil type on the N retention in WBZs. However, organic soils in fens tend to be sources of dissolved organic N and soluble reactive P, particularly when the fens have become degraded due to drainage and past agricultural usage. The detailed consideration of water sources indicated that average nitrate removal efficiencies were highest for ground water (76 ± 25%) and lowest for river water (35 ± 24%). No significant pattern for P retention emerged; however, the highest absolute removal appeared if the P source was river water. The harvesting of vegetation will minimise potential P loss from rewetted WBZs and plant biomass yield may promote circular economy value chains and provide compensation to land owners for restored land now unsuitable for conventional farming.
Estimation methods developing with remote sensing information for energy crop biomass: A comparative review
2019, Biomass and BioenergyThe rapid development of remote sensing (RS) technology enables an increased usage of high - resolution, spatial, temporal or spectral, data to extract vegetation information, improve model parameters, and estimate energy crop biomass accurately. Five estimation methods developing with RS information for energy crop biomass are summarized in this paper. Firstly, the statistical analysis with vegetation index can be regarded as the commonest method. But it is faulted for the deficiency of sample data and the vulnerability to the influence of many factors such as cloudy days. Secondly, the longer wavelength makes SAR information popular for crop biomass estimation. But many limitations lead to measurement uncertainty and bring about poor classification. Thirdly, NPP can directly reflect accumulated biomass production through photosynthesis and measure the consequences caused by climate change and human activities. But, actual LUE, the results of environmental stresses such as light intensity, temperature, water, and nutrients, is usually considered as a constant. Fourthly, crop height information is vitally important for biomass estimation. Yet the corresponding application is often subject to many factors e.g. crop variety, growth period, and farmland management practices limits. Lastly, the most promising approach lies in the possibility of assimilating state variables from RS data into CGMs. And the advent of latest instruments with better characteristics offer a unique chance to overcome current limitations. In the end, the main challenges and opportunities for energy crop biomass estimation using RS information in the future are listed.