Elsevier

Neuroscience

Volume 15, Issue 1, May 1985, Pages 97-107
Neuroscience

Horizontal optokinetic ocular nystagmus in the pigmented rat

https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(85)90126-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Horizontal optokinetic nystagmus was elicited in rats by rotation of a pattern of bright dots projected onto a cylinder surrounding the animal. Eye position was measured with the electromagnetic search coil technique. Optokinetic stimuli consisted either of velocity steps of pattern rotation or sinusoidal oscillations.

Closed-loop gain (slow phase eye velocity/pattern velocity) of steady-stage step responses in binocular vision ranged between 0.8 and 1.0 for pattern velocities up to 20–40°/s and decreased thereafter. Open-loop gain (steady-state slow phase velocity/retinal slip velocity) was dependent on retinal slip velocity and decreased linearly in double logarithmic plot from about 30 (at 0.5°/s) to about 9 (at 5°/s). For retinal slip velocities larger than 5°/s open-loop gain decayed faster and reached about 1 at 30°/s. Step response profiles showed a gradual increase in slow phase eye velocity reaching steady-state after a time period roughly proportional to stimulus velocity. Initial slow phase velocity measured within 500ms after stimulus onset reached between 2 and 4°/s and was largely independent of stimulus amplitudes above 10°/s. Occasionally rats showed fast rises in slow phase eye velocity at the onset of the step response profiles. Primary and secondary optokinetic afternystagmus were present. Duration of primary afternystagmus was largely independent of stimulus amplitude and lasted 8.0 ± 4 s. Closed-loop gain of steady-state step responses in monocular vision was, for temporonasal stimuli, similar to that measured in binocular condition while for nasotemporal stimulation gain was much smaller even at low stimulus velocities. Sinusoidal modulation of slow phase velocity was linearly dependent on stimulus velocity; the linear range decreased as frequency of stimulation increased. Slow phase velocity gain was relatively constant (ca 0.8) between 0.05 and 0.3 Hz and showed only a small tendency to decrease at larger stimulus frequencies. Phase-lag increased strongly with stimulus frequency and could be fitted by assuming a response time delay of 100 ms.

The results show that the rat's optokinetic system is qualitatively similar to that found in another lateral-eyed species, namely the rabbit. At a quantitative level, however, both fast and slow optokinetic response dynamics appear to be better developed in the rat than in the rabbit. Although the optokinetic response properties of both species are clearly different from frontal-eyed animals as far as response symmetry in monocular condition is concerned, they nevertheless share with them the basic system properties such as velocity storage and fast response characteristics.

References (38)

  • S.L. Cochran et al.

    Basic optokinetic-ocular reflex pathways in the frog

    J. Neurosci.

    (1984)
  • B. Cohen et al.

    Effects of labyrinthectomy on optokinetic afternystagmus

    Equil. Res.

    (1973)
  • B. Cohen et al.

    Quantitative analysis of the velocity characteristics of optokinetic nystagmus and optokinetic after nystagmus

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1977)
  • B. Cohen et al.

    Velocity storage, nystagmus and visual-vestibular interactions in humans

  • H. Collewijn

    Optokinetic eye movements in the rabbit: input-output relations

    Vision Res.

    (1969)
  • H. Collewijn

    The oculomotor system of the rabbit and its plasticity

  • H. Collewijn et al.

    Post-rotatory nystagmus and optokinetic after-nystagmus in the rabbit linear rather than exponential decay

    Expl Brain Res.

    (1980)
  • N. Dieringer et al.

    Compensatory head and eye movements in the frog and their contribution to stabilization of gaze

    Expl Brain Res.

    (1982)
  • N. Dieringer et al.

    Differences in the central organization of gaze stabilizing reflexes between frog and turtle

    J. comp. Physiol.

    (1983)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text