Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 35, Issue 5, September 1992, Pages 679-687
Social Science & Medicine

Adolescence and health inequalities: Extensions to macintyre and west

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90006-CGet rights and content

Abstract

The paper investigates class based health inequalities in mid to late adolescence. Health status is assessed by means of three subjective self-report measures; evaluation of general health, psychological well-being and disability/long-standing illness. Using six measures of social class (three occupationally and three non-occupationally based) which derive from parental characteristics, no evidence for consistent class based differentials in health amongst adolescents is found. However, it is not concluded that class based health inequalities are absent at this stage of the life cycle. Instead, it is argued that the above measures of social class differentiate between young people on the basis of the socio-economic status of their parents. As such they fail to allow for the possibility that variations in the current social position of young people themselves may have important consequences for their health. Current social position is assessed in terms of economic activity status, occupation and educational attainment. Using these measures, class based health inequalities are indeed found. Extending the analysis further, the relationship between social class of origin, current social circumstances and self-assessed health status is investigated by considering inter-generational occupational mobility. Again, evidence for class based health inequalities is found.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (79)

  • Increased income over time predicts better self-perceived mental health only at a population level but not for individual changes: An analysis of a longitudinal cohort using cross-lagged models

    2021, Journal of Affective Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    Among youth, there was little or no impact of income inequalities on their SPMH in the present study. This is in line with previous studies which showed that no or weak socioeconomic status differences for self-rated health among adolescents/youth compared to adults (Glendinning et al., 1992; Siahpush and Singh, 2000). The limited association among youth could be explained by the socioeconomic equalization theory.

  • Adolescent socio-economic and school-based social status, health and well-being

    2014, Social Science and Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Some studies of adolescents report similar findings (Goodman et al., 2007, 2005; Koivusilta et al., 2006; Richter et al., 2012). However, others have found little or no evidence of consistent differentials in (self-report) health/well-being measures according to various indicators of parent or household SES or area-based deprivation (Fagg et al., 2013; Glendinning et al., 1992; Spencer, 2006). Subjective social status (SSS) has been defined as a person's sense of place within a hierarchy, which may or may not reflect objective status (Adler and Stewart, 2007).

  • Moving beyond the residential neighborhood to explore social inequalities in exposure to area-level disadvantage: Results from the Interdisciplinary Study on Inequalities in Smoking

    2014, Social Science and Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Commonly used indicators such as parental education or occupation may also provide only imperfect measure of young adults' own socio-economic status since, as hypothesized by West (1997) during youth and young adulthood, people may be developing their own identity and moving away from parental influences including that of their socio-economic background (West, 1997). For these reasons, and since education has previously been used in studies on health inequalities in young adults (Casswell et al., 2003; Glendinning et al., 1992; Kestila et al., 2006; Rahkonen et al., 1995), it was deemed the most appropriate proxy for their current social position, knowledge and access to economic and cultural resources, as well as future social attainment (Galobardes et al., 2006). In the event of misclassification of participants' highest educational attainment, with less educated participants potentially moving on to higher education, the findings reported here would underestimate inequalities across educational categories.

  • The role of behavioural factors in explaining socio-economic differences in adolescent health: A multilevel study in 33 countries

    2009, Social Science and Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The findings underline previous studies which observed social inequalities in SRH in adolescence (Call & Nonnemaker, 1999; Goodman, 1999; Koivusilta, Rimpela, & Kautiainen, 2006; van der Lucht & Groothoff, 1995; Piko & Fitzpatrick, 2001; Spencer, 2006; Starfield et al., 2002; West, 1997). It needs to be acknowledged, though, that there are other studies that could not confirm a socio-economic patterning of health in adolescents (Glendinning et al., 1992; Rahkonen et al., 1995; Siahpush & Singh, 2000; Tuinstra, 1998; West, 1988). Further, our results confirm studies which identified weaker relationships between socio-economic status and adolescent tobacco use, indicating that socio-economic differences in adolescent smoking are not as pronounced as for adult smoking.

  • Objective and subjective social class gradients for substance use among Mexican adolescents

    2009, Social Science and Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The social gradient in adolescent health has largely been explored using objective indicators of the socioeconomic components of parents' social class, such as income, education, or occupation, which serve as proxy measures of access to goods and services. Several recent studies have also investigated adolescents' perceptions of their relative subjective social status (SSS)—using scales modeled after those used in adults—and found the ladders to be valuable in explaining adolescents' health status even after taking into account objective indicators of parental social class (Glendinning, Love, Hendry, & Shucksmith, 1992; Goodman et al., 2001; Goodman et al., 2000). Similar to the measurements for SSS in adults, the youth-specific indicators involve two “ladders:” one representing broader society, and the other representing one's immediate community; adolescents are asked to rank themselves on these ladders.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text