Fluoride levels in well-water from a chronic arsenicism area of Northern Mexico

https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(93)90015-GGet rights and content

Abstract

This paper reports on the concentrations and geographical relationships between fluoride and total arsenic in 129 water wells of the Región Lagunera, Mexico, where arsenic has caused severe health effects. Fluoride concentrations ranged from less than 0·5 to 3·7 mg liter−1; 25 samples (19·4%) had levels above 1·5mg liter−1, the current WHO and Mexican drinking water standard, whereas 45 (34·9%) had levels below 0·5 mg liter−1. The range of total arsenic concentrations was 0·008−0·624 mg liter−1 and 64 (50%) had levels above 0·050 mg liter−1, the current WHO standard. A linear regression analysis of arsenic and fluoride concentrations showed a highly positive correlation (r = 0·774), consistent with their geograohical distribution. The highest concentrations of both elements were found in the northeastern part of the Región, mostly corresponding to rural areas, whereas the lowest concentrations were found in the southwestern part of the Región, as well as in the cities of Torreón in the state of Coahuila, and Gómez Palacio and Lerdo in the state of Durango. In consequence, people exposed to high arsenic concentrations are also exposed to fluoride at levels above the drinking water standard. The possibility of interactions between both elements is also discussed.

References (22)

  • J.J. García-Salcedo et al.

    Estudio transversal de una cohorte de pacientes con vasculopatía por intoxicación crónica arsenical en poblados de los municipos de Francisco I. Madero y San Pedro, Coah, México

    Rev. Fac. Med. (Torreón)

    (1984)
  • Cited by (60)

    • Global geogenic groundwater pollution

      2020, Global Groundwater: Source, Scarcity, Sustainability, Security, and Solutions
    • Evaluation of vascular and kidney injury biomarkers in Mexican children exposed to inorganic fluoride

      2019, Environmental Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      A water sample was provided into polypropylene recipients by each participant. The concentrations of F in the water and urine samples were assessed by a potentiometric method using an ion selective electrode (Orion 9609BNWP, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA), as previously described (Del Razo et al., 1993). The analysis of urine fluoride reference material (U-F-0907 and U-F1510), Quebec Centre of Toxicologie) and controls were used for quality control.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text