Effects of natural sediment features on survival of the phoxocephalid amphipod, Rhepoxynius abronius

https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1136(88)90006-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Effects of sediment particle size and water content on the survival of the amphipod, Rhepoxynius abronius, were examined by manipulating these natural sediment features within static laboratory microcosms. Mean amphipod survival in fine, uncontaminated, field sediments (≥ 80% silt-clay) can be 15% lower than survival in native sediment. Storage of sediments at 4°C over 7–14 days did not change sediment toxicity, but handling (i.e. elutriation and recombination) of muddy sediments increased toxicity. Sediment particle size and organic content had greater impact on the survival of R. abronius than did sediment water content in modifying amphipod survival, but we could not independently separate the effects of these two sediment variables.

A new set of criteria is proposed to interpret toxicity results from the amphipod bioassay in the light of the mortality associated with fine sediment particle size. The efficacy of these criteria to separate mortality caused by fine particles and chemical contaminants was tested by analyzing field survey data from 78 Puget Sound (WA) Urban sites. Using our new criteria, the toxicity of these sediments was found to closely reflect the degree of chemical contamination. We propose that an approach similar to this be undertaken for toxicity tests whenever natural environmental factors induce mortality above background levels.

References (28)

  • P.F. Kemp et al.

    Life history and productivity of the Phoxocephalid amphipod Rhepoxynius abronius (Barnard)

    Journal of Crustacean Biology

    (1985)
  • P.F. Kemp et al.

    Response of the Phoxocephalid amphipod, Rhepoxynius abronius, to a small oil spill in Yaquina Bay, Oregon

    Estuaries

    (1986)
  • P.S. Meadows et al.

    The behavior of Corophium volutator (Crustacea: Amphipoda)

    Journal of Zoology, London

    (1966)
  • J.M. Oakden

    Feeding and substrate preference in five species of Phoxocephalid amphipods from central California

    Journal of Crustacean Biology

    (1984)
  • Cited by (85)

    • A quantitative assessment of organic carbon content as a regional sediment-condition indicator

      2020, Ecological Indicators
      Citation Excerpt :

      Various approaches have been used to set such quantitative values (Washington State 1995, Rygg 1995, Hyland et al. 2005, Pelletier et al. 2011). Because percent sediment total organic carbon (TOC) is generally positively correlated with sediment percent fines, which may have impacts on benthic organisms that are independent of organic content (DeWitt et al. 1988, Lamberson et al. 1992), meaningful interpretation of a sediment organic content indicator also requires an assessment of this effect. To address these issues, a quantitative analysis of literature data on sediment organic matter impacts in marine systems was conducted to determine whether abiotic indicators of sediment organic content respond as predicted at larger spatial scales.

    • Assessing estuarine quality: A cost-effective in situ assay with amphipods

      2016, Environmental Pollution
      Citation Excerpt :

      In fact, substrate preferences by two sympatric estuarine amphipods (E. marinus and Eulimnogammarus obtusatus) were studied by Maren (1975) as a potential factor to influence their spatial distribution. The granulometric properties of sediment are a key factor modulating survival, growth and reproduction for amphipods (e.g., Costa et al., 1998; DeWitt et al., 1988; Emery et al., 1997). Postexposure feeding rates were adjusted according to these factors.

    • Separating the effects of water physicochemistry and sediment contamination on Chironomus tepperi (Skuse) survival, growth and development: A boosted regression tree approach

      2014, Aquatic Toxicology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Adverse effects on test organisms due to factors other than anthropogenic contaminants may result in sediments incorrectly being classed as toxic. These “false positive” results may be caused by a wide range of experimental artefacts such as the physicochemical characteristics of the test sediment (Ankley et al., 1994), sediment grain size (DeWitt, 1998), and the physicochemistry of the overlying water (ASTM, 1997; OECD, 2010). We used boosted regression tree (BRT) models to examine potential relationships between each endpoint and predictor variables from a large dataset (>200 observations for each endpoint).

    • Biochemical response of amphipods (Gammarid: Paramorea) in a sediment laboratory exposure from Ushuaia Bay, Beagle Channel

      2011, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
      Citation Excerpt :

      Correia and Costa (2000) have found lower toxicity in amphipods Gammarus locusta exposed to metals in fine-grained sediments than in coarse grain. On the other hand, studies with amphipod crustaceans have shown that the toxicity and metal concentrations in interstitial water were reduced when metal-spiked sandy sediments were modified by the addition of fine-grained particles or sewage sludge (Swartz et al., 1985; DeWitt et al., 1988). In this study measurement of CAT, GST AChE and LPO allow monitoring of biological effects that can be due to a variety of compounds, although CAT and LPO were not specifically linked to any of the contaminants analyzed, an effect was observed in the organisms exposed to coastal sediments.

    • Variability of sediment-contact tests in freshwater sediments with low-level anthropogenic contamination-Determination of toxicity thresholds

      2010, Environmental Pollution
      Citation Excerpt :

      These sediment properties might also affect the test organisms and thus impede the interpretation of toxicity data. This has already been shown for various benthic organisms in freshwater sediments (Ankley et al., 1994, 1993; Höss et al., 1999; Sibley et al., 1998; Suedel and Rodgers, 1994) and estuarine or marine sediments (DeWitt et al., 1988, 1989; Nipper and Roper, 1995; Swartz et al., 1985). Due to the different ways in which the various benthic organisms interact with sediment (e.g. epibenthic, endobenthic, and tube-dwelling organisms), it is not possible to generalize the influence of sediment properties on organisms.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text