ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Planetary and Space Science
Volume 37, Issue 12, December 1989, Pages 1653-1672
Special Issue G.M.B. Dobson: Atmospheric Ozone Issue
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (1635 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0032-0633(89)90151-7    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 1989 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Stratospheric ozone: Impact of human activity

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Michael B. McElroya and Ross J. Salawitcha

aHarvard University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Division of Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 01238, U.S.A.


Received 16 October 1989. 
Available online 10 October 2002.

Abstract

Current knowledge of the chemistry of the stratosphere is reviewed using measurements from the Atmospheric Trace Molecule Spectroscopy (ATMOS) experiment to test the accuracy of our treatment of processes at mid-latitudes, and results from the Airborne Antarctic Ozone Experiment (AAOE) to examine our understanding of processes for the polar environment. It is shown that, except for some difficulties with N2O5 and possibly ClNO3, gas phase models for nitrogen and chlorine species at 30°N in spring are in excellent agreement with the data from ATMOS. Heterogeneous processes may have an influence on the concentrations of NO2, N2O5, HNO3, and ClNO3 for the lower stratosphere at 48°S in fall. Comparison of model and observed concentrations of O3 indicate good agreement at 30°N, with less satisfactory results at 48°S. The discrepancy between the loss rate of O3 observed over the course of the AAOE mission in 1987 and loss rates calculated using measured concentrations of ClO and BrO is found to be even larger than that reported by Anderson et al. (1989, J. geophys. Res.94, 11480). There appear to be loss processes for removal of O3 additional to the HOC1 mechanism proposed by Solomon et al. (1986, Nature321, 755), the ClO-BrO scheme favored by McElroy et al. (1986, Nature321, 759), and the ClO dimer mechanism introduced by Molina and Molina (1987, J. phys. Chem.91, 433). There is little doubt that industrial halocarbons have a significant impact on stratospheric O3. Controls on emissions more stringent than those defined by the Montreal Protocol will be required if the Antarctic Ozone Hole is not to persist as a permanent feature of the stratosphere.


Planetary and Space Science
Volume 37, Issue 12, December 1989, Pages 1653-1672
Special Issue G.M.B. Dobson: Atmospheric Ozone Issue
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.